Trump Opens Up 27.1% Lead Over DeSantis in RCP Average

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by Andrew Jackson, Apr 10, 2023.

  1. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still going with this, huh? Lol

    Let's go back 7 years. It was the Obama/Biden administration who tried to overthrow democracy, a Democratic election by going with the Trump/Russia collusion hoax. Read the Durham reports. No excuses made for it either, just the facts as reported by John Durham :)
     
    gfm7175 and CharisRose like this.
  2. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think DeSantis could beat Biden too. The polls show a slight lead as well.

    Should Trump drop out of the race, (who knows, it might happen), I hope he tells all his supporters to give their vote to Ron DeSantis. You're correct to say it will be Independents who will decide the election.
     
    CharisRose and robini123 like this.
  3. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If it were more than just his opinion at play here, wouldn't the Justice Department have already pursued charges against both Eastman and Trump?

    It hasn't happened because by all accounts, including Judge Carter's opinion, it is strikingly short of clear evidence of such criminal conduct as outlined by the leftist media gurus and their echo chamber ;) Let me remind everyone, if there was a clear case against Eastman and Trump, Biden wouldn't let Garland let this go. They cannot get a conviction; hence, Trump is not guilty of treason or as some put it, overthrowing democracy.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2023
    CharisRose likes this.
  4. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If that were the opinion of the Constitution and the ECA, Trump would have already been charged by Merrick Garland's DOJ.

    You're welcome. You can go now...
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  5. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know why some don't understand what you wrote. It's fairly easy to understand. They can say he's guilty of such and such, and more such and such, but unless there is ENOUGH proof to charge and win a conviction, (and there isn't), he'll never be charged.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2023
    CharisRose likes this.
  6. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,139
    Likes Received:
    31,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's currently being investigated by the DOJ for this. You are incapable of actually citing the Constitution or the ECA, and we both know why. Trump is going through at least three criminal investigations over this. You're welcome. You can scurry away now.
     
  7. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,139
    Likes Received:
    31,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake news. Remind us again how many criminal convictions Durham issued? You say "no excuses" when you really mean "I have nothing but excuses."
     
  8. CharisRose

    CharisRose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2021
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Female
    I have not claimed any such thing. I was asking for proof concerning your claim, instead of an opinion.
    It is your choice not to provide that proof. Just like it is my choice not to provide what you have asked me to provide in multiple posts.

    I have read the Constitution. It’s available online and I have one of those Little Brown Constitution Books that my husband purchased online for me, himself, & three of our friends. We have had discussions about The Constitution. Mostly about Rights.

    I have no paralyzing fear concerning anything. I’ve always been an independent thinker. Never was a follower. Never will be.

    Yes, I know all about the “hope” of those expectations of indictments concerning Trump.
    In my world.. it’s all about…Time will tell… if he is ever hand cuffed, perp walked and ends up wearing that orange prison garb.
    That will be a dream come true for all who have been wanting & waiting for that to happen for how many years now?

    Life is too short to fill my life with all that stupid future baggage concerning any Trump indictments that may or may not happen some day.

    Thanks, but no Thanks not at all interested…Sorry, no deal.
     
    Trixare4kids likes this.
  9. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,139
    Likes Received:
    31,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does the Constitution say the VP's role is in the election of the President? Try reading. I understand you might find life to short to provide a correct response, but your average middle schooler could help you here. Why do you hate what the Constitution clearly says about the subject?
     
  10. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,802
    Likes Received:
    9,082
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Give it time. There is a lot of that.
     
  11. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,802
    Likes Received:
    9,082
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Woke is center?????Ha!
     
    gfm7175 and Trixare4kids like this.
  12. CharisRose

    CharisRose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2021
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Female
    Well said!

    Of, course they would! If, they could, they would! That would make their hope & dreams come true!
    They have gone after Trump with multiple attempted “guilt trip” scenarios via their preferred use of….the Public Square to incite their followers.

    Thanks for the Judge Carter’s information. Information is a good thing when making good decisions.
    The leftist media gurus and their echo chamber are in submission to the powers that be… their controllers. imho

    I agree!
    When the opposition is on a witch hunt. Using “A Public Square Hollywood Production” pretend to burn the witch on a stake in that square.
    That witch hunt opposition clearly did not have a clear case to legally burn the witch in A Court of Law. imho.

    Makes sense that they knew they couldn’t get a conviction… they would have if they could have!

    They have hoped & dreamed of taking Trump out from the beginning & have continued trying to take him out.
    The current hopes & dreams are all about being Guilty of Treason via overthrowing democracy.

    I agree, They cannot get a conviction; hence Trump is not guilty of either of the :above: hope & dream.:twocents:
     
    Trixare4kids likes this.
  13. CharisRose

    CharisRose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2021
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Female
    When one, hopes and dreams for years perhaps it can become an obsession. Which, may result in not giving up on those hopes and dreams coming true some day in the future?

    Yes continually saying he’s guilty of multiple crimes in spite of the fact the such and such and the more such and such so far hasn’t come to fruition.
    That fact hasn’t prevented any of those hopes and dreams being stifled in favor of the need that there will some day be a conviction or convictions.

    Hopes and dreams will never bring about…ENOUGH proof to charge and win a conviction. (I agree), he’ll never be charged.
     
    Trixare4kids likes this.
  14. CharisRose

    CharisRose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2021
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    1,037
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Female
    Here’s the problem.

    I did not make the claim concerning the importance of the memo.
    The obligation is on the person making the claim to provide the proof of their claim. An opinion is not proof.

    I have no obligation to read the memo. I have no obligation to read the Constitution.
    I have no obligation to provide a response to an opinion.
    It’s my life and you have no authority over my life.
    If, an average middle schooler could help… I’m thinking, I should be reading in a post using proof instead of an opinion concerning that memo.
    I can’t hate something in the Constitution based on a personal opinion.
     
    Trixare4kids likes this.
  15. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Since when is trying to force all people working for all private companies with 100+ employees to wear masks & undergo invasive medical procedures OR ELSE lose your job a "center of the isle" position?
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  16. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm a conservative and I'm very happy about it.

    Your thinking is in error because it is overlooking a large swath of "only Trump" voters. Without them, neither DeSaster nor any other R candidate is going to win. Only Trump turns out those voters, and the "only Trump" crowd is MUCH larger than the "never Trump" crowd. This means that Trump is the only R candidate that can win in the general.

    I think that most people don't give a **** about the endless witch-hunts against Trump and will vote for him anyway. If anything, the endless witch-hunts will make people want to "vote harder" for Trump.

    Why would I? His policies were a HUGE boon for the working class... wages were increasing faster than inflation... manufacturing was returning... the border was secure... he stayed out of the endless foreign wars that the Uniparty always gets us into... In fact, I am now ONLY Trump ("only MAGA") because of his nationalist economic and foreign policies...

    Actually, the complete opposite is true. Again, you're overlooking or are otherwise ignorant of the significance of the "only Trump" vote.

    IOW, the Uniparty. There really is no difference between the two of them anymore...

    They are in complete alignment when it comes to globalism, endless foreign wars, putting the working class in debt, and grifting/money laundering. They use "culture wars" as a false pretense of choice, as an illusion of choice, but outside of MAGA, no choice exists... no working class representation exists...

    You underestimate how much Trump is loved and by how many people...
     
    CharisRose and Trixare4kids like this.
  17. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't think that Ron! DeSaster could do it (unless there was abysmally low turnout, which won't happen under the ballot harvesting era). People simply don't realize just how large/significant the "only Trump" vote share is... A sizeable chunk of Trump voters simply will not turn out for DeSaster nor any other globalist R candidate (just as they didn't for McCain, just as they didn't for Romney). They want a nationalist... They want Trump.

    He's not dropping out under any circumstances, and I'd vote for him (and only him) even if he were thrown in jail as a political prisoner.

    I highly doubt he'd do that, and even if he did, I still wouldn't vote for Ron! DeSaster... I'm done voting for the "lesser of two evils" globalist... In the end, you're still getting a globalist and the elitist status quo remains.

    It will be ballot harvesting that decides the (s)election... Whoever can harvest ballots better will win. The RNC is currently doing NOTHING to build up a ballot harvesting machine because all they care about is money (not about winning).
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
    CharisRose likes this.
  18. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,558
    Likes Received:
    11,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump's got a lot of legal baggage to overcome in the months leading up to the election. What do you think about that?
    I'm speaking about the March '24 Manhattan trial and the possible indictment in GA supposedly coming late summer.
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  19. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,399
    Likes Received:
    63,519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    during a national emergency, a pandemic

    and that was up to the business, republicans wanted to take the choice away from businesses

    Trump issued shutdown guidelines that meant many could not work, even if they wanted too
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
  20. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A complete re-writing of history...
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  21. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Uniparty (Dems visibly, Reps in the shadows) will keep hammering away at Trump the whole time, as they've done since he first came off of the escalator in 2015. There'll be more indictments for sure, more legal battles, etc etc... all carefully and purposefully timed, of course... None of it matters to me. I'm voting for him in the primary and the general regardless, no matter what the corrupt justice system might decide to do to him.

    I don't want Ron! DeSaster, Nikki Failey, Chris Chrispykreme, Judas "Thirty" Pence, nor any other globalist elitist money-grubbing Romney/Ryan-loving RINO.

    I don't want Creepy Joe, "Heels Up" Harris, Gavin Gruesome, nor any other globalist elitist power-grubbing Chairman Xi-loving communist.

    I want Donald J. Trump... I want America First... I want MAGA... I want representation... and that's what I will be casting my disenfranchised vote for.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
    CharisRose and Trixare4kids like this.
  22. robini123

    robini123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,701
    Likes Received:
    1,585
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Independent and swing voters decide national elections and many of us do not like Trump but would vote for DeSantis over Biden and Biden over Trump. Loyalty to Trump will likely cost republicans another election. Does not matter how many Republicans vote as they are a minority group when compared to the number of politically unaffiliated in America. Republicans and Democrats combined are about the same size as the politically unaffiliated. Overestimate the power of your party at your own peril.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
  23. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ballot harvesting decides (s)elections.

    You are describing a very miniscule portion of the electorate. Meanwhile, the "only Trump" vote is actually a difference-making portion of the electorate.

    Another?! There's no "first"...

    I don't have a party, dude... I only support MAGA. I oppose the Uniparty.
     

Share This Page