Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Again….

Fact check: Trump repeats false claim that Pelosi rejected request for National Guard ahead of Jan. 6

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-request-10000-guard-troops-jan-6/8929215002/

No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...of-trump-requested-10000-guard-troops-jan-6-/

Trump falsely claims he ‘requested’ 10,000 troops rejected by Pelosi

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...he-requested-10000-troops-rejected-by-pelosi/

 

EXCEPT:
At the end of the day, the phrase "secular progressive lett" is just a throwaway term with no real meaning behind it.

 

It’s an expression of desperation…..because he’s been caught out promoting mistruths…

 

Of course Trump lied. As I pointed out earlier in this thread, the speaker of the house does NOT have the authority to make any decisions regarding the National Guard. LOL

 

Teumpand four persons present when it happened that he did do it have all said on the record that he did initiate the process that Pelosi and the DC mayor declined. Not backing down on this one.

 

Like when liberals use the term conservative Christian right?

 

This is just an interruption in the Presidency for Life of Don I, which will resume in 2024 and continue until Don II ascends the Video Throne.

 

Had dirty donny not spread his lies about election fraud for months, or gathered them in DC on January 6, or incited them to fight, nothing bad would have happened on 1-6.
That insurrection is ALL on him.

 

Present your evidence…..

 

Seriously? Are you joking and I'm just not seeing the humor?

 

Your fact checkers have been rejected by people who were there lol

 

even if what the op said had been true, it would not excuse what the 1-6ers did, or what Trump and his gang did during and after

 

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-06/USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf

DAMN I love being right and liberals being wrong

according to the timeline they were offered national guard help and it was rejected

And guess who rejected it?

 

Oh and btw Sund requested help and a declaration of an emergency (which was a REQUIREMENT for him to receive national guard assistance) from the House Sergeant at Arms (who is controlled by Nancy Pelosi) THREE SEPARATE TIMES on Jan 6.

And they NEVER responded back to him.

The first time at 1:09pm
The second time at 1:22pm
And finally at 2:03pm

Now why would Pelosi’s henchman REFUSE to even RESPOND much less provide assistance THREE times on Jan 6?

Y’all gonna investigate that? No? I didn’t think so.

 

Now, all you have to do is show the page reference where T**** offered 10 000 National Guards, as this debunked thread tries to claim…!

 

the hearings are so bad for republicans, faux news won't air them and in fact is not even allowing commercials on their programming to make sure no one channel surfs to another station during them? Would not want their viewers to see the truth

Protect the golden calf at all costs, it seems

 

We have multiple claims from people who were there that he requested it. We also have PROOF that national guard requests were rejected by the HSAA controlled by Nancy Pelosi. We also have proof of Sund requesting help THREE TIMES on Jan 6 from the HSAA and never getting a response.

To assert this was trumps fault is objectively and demonstrably false

 

more like this

 

Oh and btw, when Sund requested help from the SSAA he got a response immediately, hence why he didn’t request from them again. Whereas he never heard back from the HSAA hence his multiple requests for assistance.

Gee I wonder why?

 

Funny picture but not my favorite optics so I got rid of it lol

But let me ask you an honest question. What do you think is more relevant to Jan 6? Trumps speech and the timeline upon which he actually did help? (Which everyone is already 90% aware of)

Or the fact the House Sergeant at Arms controlled by Nancy Pelosi was requested for help on three different points on Jan 6 and never received a response back? Of which there’s been absolutely zero discussion or explanation?

 

No dear…….let me explain it to you, step by step…..

This thread claims that T**** offered 10 000 National Guards “four days before Jan 6”.
You provide a transcript of events which you say PROVES this to be the case.
Four days before Jan 6 was Jan 2 ….was it the mathematics that threw you?
There is NO mention of T**** making such an offer in your….’evidence’…

Where are your “people” that can testify to this so-called offer…?

They don’t exist, do they….?

 

Trump by far was the spark that caused 1-6, everyone knows that - even the 1-6ers have said that

 

Lol, spreading disinformation is the Trump GOP way. Who has time to read the B/S, just run with it, it's a talking point.

 

https://bongino.com/the-evidence-tr...n-january-6th-that-fact-checkers-are-ignoring

multiple quotes and tweets and reports in that story from people who were there

 

But what’s more pertinent to January 6 security?

Or let me try it this way. Don’t we need an answer as to why the HSAA refused to even respond back to requests for assistance and an emergency declaration?