Trump recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005 - EXTREMELY

Very soon we will all see how much of an effect this has had on Trump's already sinking candidacy, for after debate no. 2 there is very likely to be a plethora of polls from all over, not to mention the 50-state series being done by both UPI and IPSOS/Reuters. Surely all of the large, major, accredited pollsters who put out premium polls will have data for us all to see this week.

 

The ridiculous, delusional, and deflective trolling (from the anti-Hillary echo chamber) is barely worth responding to anymore.

It is just the same broken record (from the same handful of usual suspects) beating the same (anti-Hillary) dead horse.

My only conclusion is that their constant beating of the anti-Clinton dead horse is serving as their early (pre-emptive) coping mechanism for the CERTAINTY of a Hillary Presidency.

 

Yeah, as long as you have power you are never guilty of anything.

- - - Updated - - -

Seeing how much y'all loved Clinton you should be head over heels about Trump!

 

Real conservatives don't post in support of Trump and these days are absent from this forum for the most part especially on the main sections. What's left are the lowest of the low - racists and other scum who will not abandon Trump unless he somehow morphs into a decent person.

These are people who are now condoning sexual assault. Think about what that makes them. They are the most distasteful of all people in society, on par with pedophile supporters and other people whose darkness we can't even imagine. They are the people who get shunned in society and killed in prison. The lowest of the low.

 

I . . . just . . . did. Next time try reading ALL of the post.

 

Oh, you can bet that tape would make headlines in EVERY damn country of the world going thru an election. But I can see how such a sexist chauvanistic candidate who lacks discipline and fundamental knowledge of the world and his own damn country might appeal to some on the right.

I agree that the issues are far more intriguing.

They have legs to stand on, and CHARACTER is an issue. But whine about the fact that Clinton got elected and the republican oppositions failed in two separate elections.
The Dems ain't gonna fail in this one,.

You think the evangelical right is going to support him now? I guess there'll be some hypocrites, but if they are true to their values, they have to walk away from him.


- - - Updated - - -

Just some video evidence of Trump calling mexicans rapists and murderers.

 

[/QUOTE]

Not so. Bill Clinton used and abused women for decades while Hillary Clinton attacked his female victims and yet leftists either turned a blind eye to those activities or displayed their true ethics by endorsing the Clintons. So it all . . . depends.

 

Get ready for the next set of GOP desertions, just as soon as the debate is over with...

 

Excuse me, but it seems you are blaming the wife for the sins of the husband, coupled with false equivalency.

The fact you are attempting to equate the words of a scorned wife against the "other women" with Donald actually admitting to being a serial sexual abuser and philanderer is ridiculous.

Bill ain't running, but Donald is.

I agree that if even a quarter of the accusations against Bill's conduct with women were true, he still displayed sexist and immoral conduct. That isn't a false equivalency. Unfortunately for you, Bill isn't running for President.

 

Statute of limitations and Bill bragged to his security detail about his assaults and was sued and had to settle for $800, 000 during a time Hillary claims they were broke and of course committed his felonies during that federal court proceeding where he suborned the perjury of a young intern under his influence setting her for a term in a federal prison all the while plotting who he would throw here under the bus and publicly smear her if she refused to go along.

You guys ain't got a leg to stand on here.

 

YOU guys set the standard with Clinton didn't you. And show me where Trump committed perjury and obstruction of justice, suborned the perjury of a witness and tampered with another witness...you know the things for which he was impeached. You think Presidents should be allowed to commit felonies in federal courst and remain in office...........then spare me your complaints about Trump.

And BTW he WAS impeached and remains an impeached Presidents, the Democrats just refused to remove him from office.

 

So you can't explain why it was OK for Democrats and the left to elect Bill and then reelect him but bad if Republicans and the right elect Trump?

Gotcha.

 

The tabloids, the head of the Britex thingy was on Fox this morning almost laughing at the faux outrage. And if it was good for the Democrats why not the Republicans?

I agree that the issues are far more intriguing.

And the Democrats showed their lack of it when they refused to force Clinton who has never had an iota of it to resign. At least we are seeing many higher up Republicans denouncing him and withdrawing their support. Never say that with the Democrats and they pleaded for a chance to elect Bill to another term and are jumping with joy he will back in the White House.

Dem's have higher character.......on pleeezzzzz.

You think the evangelical right is going to support him now? I guess there'll be some hypocrites, but if they are true to their values, they have to walk away from him.

- - - Updated - - -

So your are pointing out they have higher character and principle than the Democrats?

 

ROFLMAO...she wasn't the "scorned woman" she was the enabler who didn't care about anything than their political power which she used to enrich themselves. Unfortunately for the Democrats and the left elected him twice and would do so again today if they had the chance.

They have no ground to stand on here and they set the standard as to what is proper and improper behavior for a President and Trump has a long way to go to violate that.

 

Again, Bill isn't running for president. How is it the only defense of this idiot cheeto jesus is that bill did worse?

 

Admitting to sexual assault is not (*)(*)(*)(*)ing locker room talk, and is not becoming of the highest office in the land. I'm not excusing Bill the goof balls acts while in office.

I find it hilarious that you and the other apologists for the trump campaign cant come up with any defense at all.

Trump admitted to committing acts of sexual assault on microphone and bragged about it. This is locker room talk "She's slammin, I'd love to hit that."

Saying you randomly grab people by the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) or just start kissing them is bragging about sexual assault, not (*)(*)(*)(*)ing locker room talk, and anyone who thinks it is has a very skewed perception of what Trump really said here.

 

Hillary's part in attacking the women that Bill used and abused went -- zip! -- right over your head? Cool! It's like magic.

 

The defense is your hypocrisy.

 

I think the point people are missing is that the conversation was intended as sarcastic humor. Guys know how other guy talk to each other.

 

No, it didn't.

Its a rather large false equivalency to suggest that hilary in defending her husband from ALLEGATIONS against him is the same as your guy admitting to being a sexual predator.

Guess that flew right over your head.

 

"enabler". that is a specious accusation with ZERO evidence or substance. Just the thing that trumpettes like to believe.

I don't defend Bill Clinton, nor do I dismiss the women who have in some cases alleged and in other cases proven his behavior.
I guess you must have completely missed the fact that Bill Clinton isn't running for president these days.

Not that the trumpettes can actually decipher that the defense "well what he did was worse" isn't a defense, its a deflection.

 

Imagine trumps buddy defending trump by claiming that the outrage over the tape is "faux". Tell that to the large majority of americans who don't think so.

Never said democrats have higher character than republicans.

I was referring to the fact that "character" is one of the most important criteria for evaluating who to vote for and that in this case evaluating the republican candidate for president. this tape, coming after a string of other questionable comments and actions provides a pretty damn good picture of the lack of character, morals and knowledge that that he has.


But of course you want to make this a discussion about partisan character and morals, as if one's political biases inform one of their character and morality. That is a ridiculous strawman because I for one NEVER remotely suggested it.

 

Johnson used to invite girls to hotel rooms and parties and the reporters would tun a blind eye. This stuff isn't new. Presidents are not a moral guide post. They never were.

 

Well, go to church and pray for his redemption for belief in the sinfulness of his language as a morality word police - and pray for the vile rapist Bill Clinton and for the Mistress of Death psychotic sociopath Hillary Clinton who again vowed to go to war against Russia over Syria leading to WWIII.

 

No the true hypocracy is the right which attempted to impeach Clinton and yet they now are willing to support Trump who has cheated on his three wives and admitted sexually assaulting women.