Trump supporters call for riots and violent retribution after verdict

You would pay taxes if you sold it.

 

I love how that's seared into you guys memory but you progressives have forgotten all about the over 200 arrest and injured police officers all over DC on Trump's inauguration Day.

In addition to that immigrant who watched his dream burn up in the form of an act of arson against his private limousine.... There were other fires around DC that day.

 

How many of those arrests stuck and how many police officers were injured? And when did Biden say he would exonerate the attackers, record a song with them, and give them high fives?

 

Trump's worshipers are very upset that a jury of his peers, selected by both the prosecution and defense counsel, all agreed that the avowed "p*ssy grabber" - who had been established by our legal system to be a sexual abuser - cannot claim that his hush money paid to his bimbos to hide his moral turpitude from the public during a political campaign is a legitimate business expense.

The rationalization for their calling for violence against the district attorney, the judge, and the jury and their families may be that they considerate their rage to be less embarrassing that a permissible legal appeal that inevitably keeps the spotlight on his moral turpitude.

 

If such events occurred and were incited by a disgruntle politician who pleasured himself for hours watching them, impervious to the desperate pleas of aides, advisers, media enablers, family member and others that he call them off, that politician should bear the consequences, of course.

 

Just violent talk about shooting democrats, attacks on jurors, the execution of the judge. Yes that's all so far. What do you think about that?

 

So that means that he's a communist dictator.

 

They also love expanding the return to assets. It's no mistake home prices (and rents) have skyrocketed...



The stock market, too...



The rich guys know exactly what they're doing.

 

Just as you confidently forgot to mention that the District settled the wrongful arrest suit for $1.5 million.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...42f2d8-a6a2-11eb-8d25-7b30e74923ea_story.html

Oh, and these disturbances were not the result of months long right wing propoganda campaigns to sell a lie. Nor were they a part of a larger White House plot to overturn the election.

 

Developer dirty dealing is indeed nothing new. A lot of "no talents" make money assembling land and then getting zoning changes. You don't have to be a genius to buy a farm and break it into city lots.

 

Control is enduring.

Rightful ownership is problematic when we look at the run up in asset values. What happened to asset values has transferred a lot of wealth to "haves" from "have nots."

 

Who is telling you this insanity the people who constantly crap on the constitution are almost universally leftist.

 

Paul Navarro, John Eastman, Steve Bannon.

As for the "left crapping on the Constitution", you're the one who cheers for the man who openly claims he will suspend it.

 

LoL... that is exactly what I am doing now... I hope to turn 200K into 2 million...

 

If it's there and you know how to get it--if you don't, someone else will--why not?

I learned about this stuff when I was a kid and my mother was on the city council, then mayor. Sometimes, you just have to know the right people. I'm not discounting that some builders and developers come up with nice buildings, nice communities and good places to live.

 

Utter nonsense.The only thing he said or implied was that he was going to reverse all Biden's executive orders on day one. And if he is half way smart he will follow that by firing every single person in DC he legally can

 

And the charges were dropped. Nobody went to jail.

 

What kind of evidence would that person have submitted?
Probably wasn't pertinent to the case.

 

obviously something the judge didn't want to let people hear.

 

So, you don't know.
Non pertinent info is always something any judge won't allow.

 

Yeah, whatever, basically:

 

Yep, no thought, no analysis. Just the assumption that everything is bad.

 

Please where did I say everything was bad? There is a lot of good in the world today it is just that currently none of it emanates from DC.

 

Oh please how would testimony regarding current election law not be pertinent to a case that is all about election law?

 

You made no point.
You made a claim about something and never gave any indication that your claim has any validity.

If one has nothing to back up a claim, then said claim is fantasy.