Trump will be arrested Tuesday....

You did not answer the question. Would you or would you not refer to the guy you see on the morning news caught by a security camera pointing a gun at the cashier at a convenience store and taking all the cash as a criminal?

But, the fact that you evaded the question is itself an answer. Obviously you would. But not if their last name is Trump. Otherwise you wouldn't call it my position.

 

Unless it's oral sex being paid for.

 

MAGA movement is more about whiteness.

 

Of course you refer to mostly white males.
For everyone else, the country has got better for them.

 

What if the person you saw committing the robbery was wearing a disguise; would you still say the person they arrested was a criminal or a suspect?

 

Trump is not wearing a disguise. And you have had THREE opportunities to answer the question and are still struggling to defend the Orange demi-god.

 

I'm defending the principle of our justice system being blind, while you're continuing to deflect to "orange man bad".

 

Four times! Count them. And you didn't answer the question. No... you are NOT defending the justice system. If you were, you would WANT criminals in court. And you don't want that if their name is Trump. But what I said has nothing to do with that. It has to do with the fact that Trump, even though not yet a CONVICTED criminal, is nonetheless a PROVEN criminal. Just like the guy in the security camera who assaulted the convenience store. Except Trump didn't even bother to wear a mask. Which makes it an even easier call. So don't come here talking nonsense about "defending the justice system". NOTHING could be further from the truth. You have ZERO interest in that. But you thought you could use that excuse to defend your hero. It didn't work!

 

Well, if Trump is a "proven criminal" why waste taxpayer's money with a trial? Just throw his ass in jail.

 

See how what works, whataboutism?

 

@Golem

just more of your misdirection and misinformation.... just the usual liberal "guilty until proven innocent, or we can keep on trying and failing until we can"
your post is what we expect here... you can do better than this..

 

No he wasn't, he was impeached for lying about it. Under oath.

 

After looking more into this, I'm not so sure he'll be arrested on Tuesday or at all (at least for this crime). He seems to be the sole source for claiming that there will be an arrest on Tuesday. He may just be throwing out fantasies to drum up more donations and so he can claim on Tuesday, if he isn't arrested, that it is some kind of victory.

 

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." Bill Clinton ... yep ...... he left some evidence on the "blew" dress...

 

Man, you must be SUPER pissed at the conservatives who have accused Clinton and Hunter Biden of being criminals. If you aren't a hypocrite, that is.

 

and it worked.. we have 12 pages on here for something nobody else is claiming but Trump...

 

Que?

 

Ah! How predictable was it that a Trump supporter would resort to binary thinking to try to get out of the argumentative mess they get themselves into.

No. There has to be a trial to be a CONVICTED criminal. But he is now most definitely a PROVEN criminal.

 

The table was a sad attempt once again to mislead and misrepresent... the same low standard posting we see on here all along... no surprise you a stepping right in line...

 

So if I look at your post history, I won't find a single example of you calling anyone a criminal or guilty or accusing people of crimes unless they have already been found guilty in a court of law? You never rely on publicly available information? Ever? You sure about that?

 

*sigh* Some matters are binary. Your continued attempt to go to it as an argument is, in itself, binary thinking. The mess is of your own fabrication and this binary crap only proves it.

 

Trump is as much of a PROVEN criminal as Joe Biden is. The difference your side has the press and the Justice Department to hide the truth.

 

He's gonna be arrested tomorrow? I think I'm gonna purchase shares of lube right now! Liberals will be buying it to the point of it going out of stock!

 

Or course some matters ARE binary. But not what you claimed. You keep arguing that somebody who committed a crime is either not a criminal or they're in prison. No other options.

On the other hand, you only contend that if their last name is Trump. You have implicitly acknowledged (by failing to answer the question) that this does not apply if you're Joe Schmo robbing a convenience store.

 

My argument was, and remains, that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, not your court of public opinion.