Truth about COVID finally emerges

So his two quotes below are not saying the government should lie?

"The government didn't want us mad at China at the time. I don't blame them for that."...

and then later when he gave more detail in post 14 and said...
"The public doesn't need the truth just for the truth's sake. We are too stupid to handle it responsibly."...


You spout a lot of nonsense and simply deny that which is placed right in front of you. That is not typically the tactic of someone playing a strong hand. It must be liberating not caring about intellectual integrity.

 

See above.

 

See above.

 

I think it's important to know how in discussions of the origins of COVID in DC those with views that didn't follow the narrative were sidelined ,,, to include the head of the CDC?

https://www.westernjournal.com/fauc...d-front-congressional-covid-origin-committee/

How do we know the same kind of disinformation campaign hasn't cost us Trillions of $'s to 'fight' a manufactured crisis like climate change?

 

No lie there

Again, nothing there but the real problem is all the quotes you conveniently left out. Why? Oh yeah, context. What he was talking about was for the government to not say anything. To give little to no information and you twisted that for your own purpose. Completely disingenuous.

 

Ahh, yes
The old...."I know you are but what am I" retort. Brilliant debate tactic.#sad

 

LOL
You're definition of "intellectual integrity" is strawman after strawman with a touch of twisted context.

 

Quote; I think it’s important to know how…..

Agree if you agree that it was also important to investigate the U.S. Capitol attack.

 

No lie there? For crying out loud, when he said he doesn't blame them, what he doesn't blame them for is the LIE.

You are as intellectually dishonest as they come.

 

This is not supported by the record even remotely.

Your lying about the record is a prime example of your LACK of integrity.

 

What is the lie.
That's a simple question.

 

You record speaks for itself

 

Indeed it does.

 

I think that any rational person would have recognized that the probability of it being a lab leak was at least 99.9%. Given the unique nature of the virus and the lab's special purpose combined with the geographical proximity of the first cases and the lab constitute overwhelming odds of anything else.

The most important question is- why did the government deny that and fabricate alternate theories in the face of that? Political reasons, of course. They literally chose to deceive the people.
That's being proven; that is the important revelation.

 

It was. It was also important that the investigation was truly bipartisan, with leaders of each party designating committee members. That precedent wasn't followed. We now have some party leaders aghast that videos showing inconvenient evidence belying the narratives sold to the American people were withheld from attorneys representing protesters.

 

Yes. The people are too stupid for the truth sometimes. The governments responsibility extends beyond telling the truth.

 

True. I posted the truth complete with links on this site a couple of years ago. Anyone who posted on Twitter what I posted here would have been called a conspiracy theorist and would have been disemboweled along with their post, would have been fired if they had a job, and once central bank digital currency is foisted on us, they would have their bank accounts zeroed out. Thank goodness we're not in China.

 

Our government started lying long before the secret escaped from Wuhan. They started constructing the lie in May 2014 when they funded gain of function research and lied to the world in October 2014 that they were ceasing to fund risky gain-of-function research.

The grant number was R01AI11096, funding EcoHealth Alliance to the tune of around $3.7M which funded Wuhan. Based on the following and Fauci's recent deception to hide his culpability whether this was a money laundering operation.

Here is a link to the October 2014 untruth
https://www.nature.com/news/us-suspends-risky-disease-research-1.16192
that begins:
The US government surprised many researchers on 17 October when it announced that it will temporarily stop funding new research that makes certain viruses more deadly or transmissible. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is also asking researchers who conduct such ‘gain-of-function’ experiments on influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) to stop their work until a risk assessment is completed — leaving many unsure of how to proceed.

 

The truth has not emerged yet. However, I support calls for more transparency and more research on the origins of Sars-Cov2. Especially the furin cleveage site is of concern, which has sequence identity with human ENaC and can account for the strong respiratory effects of covid by out-competing ENaC for the protease. This exact same furin cleavage site has not been found in other coronaviruses of the same class.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202769119

Even more concerning is that the ENaC furin cleavage site has been inserted into a non-functional Sars-Cov1, with the predicted increased transmissibility. It would be easy for a malevolent actor, be it private or a foreign government, to create a functional Sars-Cov1 with the new furin cleavage site. Sars-Cov1 has a 9% case fatality rate. It's saving grace was that it wasn't very transmittable. If someone would generate Sars-Cov1 with the transmissibility of Sars-Cov2, the covid pandemic would look like child's play.

 

Huuuuuummm, looks like your narrative is Tucker leaning.

My question to you; In reference of George Floyd, how would you react if I were to show you ONLY 40 hours of peaceful protests?

In other words, “there are two sides to every coin”

 

So Tucker helped me build this spreadsheet on May 1, 2020 because he knew the png image of the original US Government spending page wouldn't copy well? Since you're into posing conspiracy theories to run against the documented facts I posted, do you find it interesting that the Obama regime would fund the development of a bioweapon just as his signature healthcare law was going full live? As interesting as the two chief climate alarmists buying properties on Martha's Vineyard after claiming they would be under water?

 

How do viruses not exist?

 

Have you even thought for a microsecond that perhaps, just maybe, China actually needs to be invaded???

 

Not even for a nanosecond.

 

It's well past time that you do. They are demonstrably a threat to basically all of humanity, they are an authoritarian government who is likely to invade a peaceful neighbor in the next few years, and in consideration of having a madman with nukes, that by itself, just like N. Korea and Russia, is just cause for concern and possible action.