You can't buy it in Walmart for sure but, it existed in 2001, and probably in a much more sophisticated version today.
You making yet another bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim with absolutely no proof isn't going to convince anyone, RWAF. If you're so sure of the existance of nanothermite paint, produce some evidence. The whole purpose of reducing the particle size in nano thermite is to increase the reaction speed by allowing more surface area between the iron oxide and aluminum. Mix everything up with ANYTHING else and you've made the reaction impossible as the particles are no longer together. This is the truth you continue to run from.
It's "classified". Isn't that what truth seekers often hear too? The truth can be explained by Physicist Steven Jones....I'm not of that caliber so I wouldn't try to offer the technical aspects to you (not that you would accept it even if I could).
Eggs contain yolk. Do you have a specific point? NANO refers to the technology, you know already I'm sure. Do you really think it WOULDN'T be classified as to if it existed? But if John Doe can't understand it, then it must not exist.
[/FONT]QUOTE=RtWngaFraud;1061166948]Eggs contain yolk. Do you have a specific point? NANO refers to the technology, you know already I'm sure. Do you really think it WOULDN'T be classified as to if it existed? But if John Doe can't understand it, then it must not exist.[/QUOTE] IF it's 'classified',how do you know it exists?
IF it's 'classified',how do you know it exists?[/QUOTE] Isn't that always the answer we're given when we've got the goods on the criminal? "It's classified". How do I know it exists? Because credentialed individuals looking for truth have already hinted at its existence and one even has evidence of it that was collected from the scene.
So let me get this straight. You post claims based on "classified" material you're not even sure exists? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! How ignorant is that! You still can't explain that while the FACT that what makes nano thermite so much better is the smaller particle size, mixing it with paint completely defeats the purpose! Not to mention the fact you can't even begin to explain how the nano thermite paint was suppose to cut the columns. Nano thermite is not a high explosive and even if it were, it would need to be concentrated like other high explosives. They don't paint high explosives on, they create shaped charges that then cut the column at a specific point. All thermites work through heat from the exothermic reation. Even pure thermite the thickness of paint on a column would leave the column surface mildly warm. Why do truthers pretend steel can instantly melt?
Steven Jones can explain NanoThermate, it's additives, and what he found if the form of unexploded nano. Give him a call instead of badgering me.
You're the one making the claims. Yet another example of you making a claim, being unable to back it up, and running away claiming ignorance. No surprise here. It doesn't take a scientist to understand what you've been told, nor do I have any doubts you know with great certainty that your claims are bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
Yet another time where a 9/11 denier is asked to provide support for their claims, and they run away.
The heat of ignition for the oxygen to be released from the iron oxide and bonded to the aluminum is extremely high. Thermite is typically ignited with burning magnesium which reaches temperatures of 5000+ deg. F. These temperatures then need to be sustained in order for the sample of thermite to react to completion. It will not react at temperatures experienced within a normal office fire. These temperatures are well above the temperatures experienced within the building. Perhaps this stuff is not as "easy" as you think it is.
Yes. I really do think it WOULDN'T be classified. Such compounds and the techniques for creating them are researched in school labs by first year chemistry students. The government doesn't have a top secret volcano island full of chemists working on compounds that are only used to fool conspiracy theorists...
Google James Millette, or stop by the JREF 9/11 page and read it there. Idiot boy Jones and his whackadoodle buddy Harrit have been playing with PAINT chips. The morons didn't even think to ask whether there was a different kind of paint on the trusses than on the columns. Sorry (*)(*)(*)(*)ed excuses for forensic scientists, both of those turds are. And Basille is a vapid twit as well. I would call any of the three dunces right to their faces, if ever I met them. Will somebody please call the three stooges and tell them that there is no kaolin in thermite, but it is a major component of PAINT. Those clowns built a vast theory out of half-vast research.
This is an example of why honest discussion cannot be achieved and a repeated example of why I disengage this type of commentary. It has no chance of becoming an "honest' discussion. (what some of you boys call "running").
Honest discussion should be self explanatory. You know, a back and forth exchange of ideas, opinions, what one believes to be proof of the point....like that. This too steep a hill for you or what?
He tried that. Go back through the thread... There are dozens of points you haven't responded to. I still have my standing offer... If any 9/11 Denier can go 5 posts in a row answering every question asked of them by a non-9/11 denier, I'll paypal them $100.
I'm trying to use a different approach here now, so perhaps we can avoid all the previous unpleasant conversations. Won't you join in the spirit of getting to the truth of the matter?
LOL, why not a million? It doesn't matter. You've been here for a year and can't go 2 posts without changing the subject or dodging, let alone 5. How does a thermite flame cut something (a support column) horizontally, when all fire burns vertically?
