Tucker Carlson Says Democrats Are The Party Of ‘Weak Men And Unhappy Women’

I don’t think any race is superior to any other race? What part of my post made you think I did?

 

Not really, no.

The (former?) world’s richest man is currently demonstrating his ineptitude for the world to see. You think his wealth is based on merit? I don’t think so.

 

It's by design.

Is people grow older and get together and formulationships and eventually have children they become more conservative they become more interested in the future. That's why so much of leftist politics are about making the opposit sex unappealing. They are telling women to be unappealing feminist used sex toys and thus is not something that makes women happy.

Just Google women dating over 30. It's a wasteland of sadness.

I'm sure you've heard of fat acceptance and this is just for women because obese women are unattractive to men.

Keeping them single even if they're parents is the number one cause of poverty and the benefit of raising poorly adjusted abused children in single parent households do you trade them how to seek toxic unfulfilling relationships.

This seems to be something that has been in place I'm not going to call it a right or left thing because if you get benefits both of their self-centered controlling ends.

And the sad part about it nobody's happy. People without hope are easy to control.

 

No they can't but I that doesn't make you better than them.

And a woman can do what you do. But women can't do what they do.

 

We do.

 

We don’t.

 

Yes, of course.

 

I'm beginning to wonder if there are any Democrats at all that do not embrace the Woke sophistry. All the ones I've known for years have become like Zombies. Unable to mount a rational defense of that agenda.

 

You must be a misunderstood genius.

 

So it had nothing to do with his father owning an emerald mine? Nothing to do with him using family wealth to buy businesses from people who actually built them? Being born into the ownership of capital is not merit.

 

How so?

 

And capitalism and less gov't spending...Now that I think about it, there really aren't many politicians on either side of the aisle who're for less government spending.

 

You seem bitter

 

You’d have to explain that conclusion.

 

But meritorious people are successful
And that is the important point.

 

That is seldom the case.

 

I see race baiting on this site all the time. Seems like non-white race baiting gets flagged on DP while white race baiting on DP does not.

 

You seem to think that your merit has not lead to success.

 

You’ve not defined what you believe race baiting is, only that you see it. Without clarification there is no way of knowing what you’re referring to.

 

Not so seldom I have not witnessed it several times.

 

You are right, that doesn't make me better than them, which I actually never implied.

However, you implied in your previous post that someone who can erect skyscrapers is better than me, because women can do what I do, but they can't do what they do? Are there no women construction workers? No women firefighters? No women who help after a hurricane? Just wondering where this comes from? .

 

My work has been rewarded. I’m doing fine.

Capitalism inherently can not coincide with a meritocracy. It’s a myth.

 

Capitalism is a meritocracy. The merit strived for is satisfying the public.

 

Capitalism never rewarded "innovation." It rewarded the overhyping of any technological advance, meaningful or superfluous, to the point where people make up any unnecessary "improvement" that'll pay for itself once they've convinced enough customers they need it.

 

More hating on your part?

Let's see: You hate capitalism and Judeo-Christianity. Are you a neo-communist?
Heh, I know neo-communists would rather be referred to as anarchists.