Tucker Carlson starts to divulge the Capitol video tapes

I started but the taste of vomit in my mouth became too much plus - I is that a normal amount I’d advertising for your TV?

 

I Google “
Ray Epps” (hey can’t remember every whack job conspiracy)

and I found this

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/05/us/jan-6-ray-epps-evidence.html


so this has already had a good debunking

 

The less important point): You did not offer me video, only still pictures, of such poor quality, I can certainly not identify people. Are you saying that the person in the top picture, not running, is Hawley, as well?

Setting aside, that this gives me no context, as to the location of those two spots, and when or why Hawley was passing through them-- what was proven by Tucker, was that Josh Hawley was not running the entire time? Wow, that's some major news-- it really makes me see January 6th, in a whole new light.


The more important point): Who gives a crap, at what point, Hawley ran-- or even if he ran, for that matter? I thought this was supposed to portray a counter narrative of the Capitol attack, not a fix of Josh Hawley's image.

 

Tucker will edit, cut and paste, and do all the tricks to try to change the narrative. Meanwhile, the entire tapes will be used in any criminal trial by jury or judge, and that will be the difference.

Nothing new here from Tucker, just more misdirection and continued conspiracy theories to the sheep he is telling it to.

 

Riots are unlawful and should be. Assault is unlawful and should be. Riots and assault =/= insurrection. People being locked up for years for trespassing because they were involved in a protest where some other people rioted and the media called it an insurrection should be just as criminal as insurrection would have been if it had actually happened (it didn't).

If hundreds of right wingers had actually attempted to violently overthrow the govt, they would have used their guns. They didn't.

Jan 6 was a riot. Almost certainly povacateured by LE/Feds, possibly even escalated by Capital Police (further OPEN evaluation of the footage required). But the 'insurrection' narrative is a giant pile a BS.

 

It's fine as long as it is to Democrats and Democractic causes. But god forbid a Democrat yells at a conservative or to Tucker, then it will be considered domestic terrorism.

The classic different strokes for different folks routine.

 

So, the allegation, here, is that Sicknick was not killed?

So, is Tucker going to tell us whose ashes, these were?

 

He died later in the hospital due to a condition that was never linked to the riot at the capital. Aneurism or stroke iirc.

 

Looks like he was outside the building, to me. Just to clarify: you are saying that everyone in that Trump crowd, who even walked onto the Capitol grounds should be indicted?

Now why did I think, that your attitude has been that the DOJ and Dems in Congress, have been making too big a deal, out of all this? When actually, you believe they have been treating it too lightly?

 

I like your comment about the vomit, and totally believe you weren't just joking.

I can't answer your question about the commercials, because I haven't watched any of it, yet. I think it is unreasonable for anyone posting a thread, to expect visitors to put in a half hour of their time, without even getting a preview, of why they should want to watch. If Popscott has seen the whole video, and is posting about particular parts of it, there is no reason that I see, he shouldn't both cite the minute mark of the video, covering any given post, and give a basic rundown, of what we can expect to see there.

 

And you know that the timing was purely coincidental, and unrelated to the attack, how?

 

Right. Protestors waiting politely outside a restaurant, are cast as a lynch mob, threatening Justice Kavanaugh's life.

Mod edit at members request

 

Especially a video that still has the freaking commercials!

 

No it just was not definitively linked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Brian_Sicknick

Since it was a “stroke” it is difficult to determine a direct cause and effect but also since “strokes may be precipitated by heavy exercise and hypertension from stress we cannot rule out a link either

 

CORRECTION: Auto correct has a habit of substituting more common words, for the ones I type. So, post #38 is supposed to read "lynch mob," not "lunch mob." Since the scene is outside a restaurant, the error could be less noticably, a mistake.

I am pretty sure, the only ones convicted of sedition, have been those Oath Keepers who, it was clearly proven, by their own testimony, had actually planned to take part in an insurrection, and were well armed, to do so. Those merely trespassing, have not been sentenced as if they'd been found guilty of sedition. Their penalties have been within the established guidelines for their offenses. Where do you get your news? Oh, wait-- don't tell me: FOX?



My reply, above, answers the rest of your post, as well. You are under the false impression-- unless you are specifically referring to the Oath Keepers, that people were sentenced for more serious crimes, than they'd actually committed. But, just FYI, * "riots and assault," at the U.S. Capitol, when it is in session, are pretty serious offenses, in themselves, even if they might seem petty, compared to "sedition/insurrection." Your charge, below, that the riot was "Almost certainly provocateured by LE/Feds..." is laughably baseless. The provocateurs were RW militia people, like the Oath Keepers.

 

Could they have chosen a more asinine person to give them to? He's not exactly the poster boy for fairness. Even FOX has some far more even handed and fair people than him but I suppose Homer wasn't available and Marge rarely takes on the political. OK, Jeanine Pirro would have been worse. Maybe. Tough call.

 

Being you obviously did not watch the video.... Sicknick was not killed at the Capitol that day... We have known that but the left keeps pushing the narrative he died that day... Even the Capitol Police acknowledged it from their website
Medical Examiner Finds USCP Officer Brian Sicknick Died of Natural Causes
https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/p...cp-officer-brian-sicknick-died-natural-causes

https://nypost.com/2023/03/06/footage-shows-capitol-cop-brian-sicknick-uninjured-on-jan-6/

 

Fairness is when exculpatory video is show along with incriminating video... That is something Tucker is striving to do, but exactly what the Jan. 6 committee did not do. I see the left will take the stance to kill the messenger instead of excepting the message..

 

See no evil, hear no evil. Normal human behavior.

 

""Tucker will edit, cut and paste, and do all the tricks to try to change the narrative"" Are you saying Tucker will illegally alter evidence? Is that not exactly what the Committee already did by simply leaving out exculpatory evidence? Here is some the committee would NEVER show, and would be covering up evidence of how the Capitol Police riled up the PEACEFUL crowd beforehand with flash bangs and pepper spray

Have you see the footage of the Capitol Police getting the peaceful crowd riled with flashbangs and pepper spray.... and don't forget the physical beating with their fists ( a little later in this clip)

You think the Capitol videos would DARE show this?

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1421942908954062853

https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/...d-jan-6-crowd-by-firing-flash-bangs-tear-gas/

https://www.worldtribune.com/report...d-jan-6-crowd-by-firing-flash-bangs-tear-gas/

https://rumble.com/vj4p3j-capitol-police-throw-flashbangs-on-peaceful-crowd-january-6-2021.html

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rats-media-dc-police-refuse-release-evidence/

 

You mean like the Elon Twitter Files and The Jordan Propaganda Committee with their paid "whistleblowers", paid by Kash Patel?

 

If the raw, unedited show a different conclusion from the highly edits versions the January 6th committee provided, why wouldn’t you be interested? Isn’t it preferable to know the truth?

The mob had no business going into the Capitol, but if their behavior was less disruptive than that portrayed by the committee, the American people should know.

 

Less disruptive than the smashed windows and doors? Less disruptive than breaking into offices and stealing items? Less disruptive than assaulting Capitol police? We all saw those pics and videos, did we not?

 

Carlson is not known for truth telling

It is a side effect of testicle tanning

 

That's an interesting "observation"