Two and a half hour explaination of everthing Creationism.

TROLL ALERT!!!!!!

The picture in Distaffs post CLEARLY shows the evolution from Mesonyshids to today’s whale.

The only reason to ask a ridiculous question like 'what animal did they come from', is because the poster is trolling.

 

Hovind has always been a great source of entertainment for me. He used to be a high school science teacher, but he goes around (repeatedly) saying things like:

*Sound is part of the electromagnetic spectrum
*A single drop of water could cover the earth if you spread it out thin enough
*When you are traveling down the road at 60 mph and turn your headlights on, the light from them is now traveling 60mph faster than the speed of light

And other stuff that anyone with minimum education in science should able to correct him on.

It pains me whenever I stumble across someone who is an admirer. The man is a talented debater, I'll give him that, but that's about all he is.

 

My favourite is how he thinks that the Theory of Evolution also covers the Big Bang, star formation, etc.

 

Avoiding the question. I can answer how evolution can do what you ask, though my guess is you would not like the answer.

My point is that if you're going to ask this question of evolution then you have to be fair and ask the same of God-creation. But then the problem becomes apparent: the first question is possible to answer, the second question is not.

 

Any answer you don't like is a "rationalization." What about the things you believe. Are they all also rationalizations? That is, do you apply the same standards of doubt to you rown beliefs as you do to others'?

 

You have misunderstood what constitutes a scientific theory. Furthermore, the self replication of nucliotides is not a part of the theory of evolution. the theory of evolution explains that all life living and extant is descendant from a single common ancestor.

 

That site is an evolution propaganda place. So what man does in the lab is proof. Where is the proof for man.

Where is the proof for whales since that was claimed in this thread

 

No we don't have proof what evolved from and if man and ape evolved from the same species.

We also have huge time gaps and many missing links in the progression

 

Wait I thought it said her scientific theory was proven.

That means it would be based on facts

So is scientific theory opinions and guesses

 

So you know about evolution but not about hoe their theories have changed. That means you know little about evolution

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread163678/pg1

http://www.mathematicsofevolution.com/ChaptersMath/Chapter_020__The_Empty_Box__.html

http://www.evanwiggs.com/articles/reasons.html

http://www.alternativeinsight.com/Lamarck.html

 

Then show proof of the animal. Showing a generic animal as a theory does not show the proof. That kakes it more of a fairy tale than proof. Show the animal and the progression not a fairy tale theory

 

No we are not talking about creation. Creation is religion is by faith. Evolution claims to be scientific biut ends up being religion because the facts are vague so it takes faith to accept it.

Evolution is not proven and is not what evolutionists try to make it appear to be.

 

So you are making excuses for the lack of facts and then try to turn it on me because of your lack of proof LOL

 

So what is that on common ancestor? Here is a thought. Because liberals have a history of not accepting opposing views they have hurt evolution.

The truth is we do not know how things happened. We will probably never know. Like creation, evolution is not proven and is by faith more than fact.

Remember breeding is not the same as evolution. Many different finches is breeding not evolution.

It could be there was creation and the evolution process was part of the design of the creator.

 

Those posts are just abhorrent. They frequently employ slander, quote mining, perversions of data/methods and obscene & egreigous lies. Is this really the best material the creation brain trust can come up with. It is very very sad. An utter & complete disregard for any sort of intellectual honesty. This ones for you you silly monkeys!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hominina_fossils

 

Last universal ancestor

Every single living independant organism on this Earth have the follow:

Grass, a banana tree, and ant, a chipmunk, a cardinal, a hippo, a chimpanzee, and human....doesn't matter.

If evolution were not true, then how does every single living independent organism on this Earth have the above characteristic? Why would a creator make every creatures DNA structure the same? Is this creator trying to fool us? Using the same DNA structure isn't intelligent design. Using a specific DNA structures for specific creatures is intelligent design.

PS: Still waiting on an answer to Human Chromosome 2.

 

Got any ligitmate sites?

 

Sweet Feathery Jesus, That Fish has Got Legs!!!

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7085/abs/nature04639.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik

 

You are proven wrong and you try to demean the facts

 

Those are, address the facts. Saying the site is not legitimate is a way to avoid addressing the facts in the article. If it is wrong it should be easy for you to prove

 

All DNA is not the same. My DNA is different than yours

 

Go find an article that has been peer-reviewed that claims Evolution is wrong.

Until then, you got a whole lot of nuttin.

PS: Still waiting on a responce to Human Chromosome 2 and not it appears the LUA you dont have answer for either.

 

So did a fish grow legs or did evolve from a land animal? If it evolved what animal did ir evolve from.


The more you show the more questions you create with no answers

 

No peer review means nothing. I can show an article on polar bears where one of the people doing the peer review was his wife. It means nothing.

If my articles are wrong prove it

 

This is ALL that people need to know about this poster.

Bravo

Have fun drowning in your ignorance.