Visible explosions in WTC7.The video you did not know exists...

Blast evidence is more than just 'dirt'

 

What exact characteristic should one be looking for to discern
blast damage, & explosives residue? In the rubble of the towers
there was a lot of bent metal, what then should stand out as
blast damage?

 

They did in fact look for evidence of explosives ( the FBI ) nothing found.

 

Ask an explosives expert

 

So, were there any explosives experts going
over the rubble at ground zero on 9/11/2001?

 

more than likely....

 

You say "more than likely" however, if so, are there any reports
by any of these experts? and where are these reports to be found?

 

I don;'t have to prove anything

You want to find them,look for youself

 

Ya know, I would have thought that the people
who are promoting that Radical Arabs hijacked airliners ....
story, would jump at the chance to show the un-enlightened
ones the error of their ways, but the fact that you do not
provide info or links to info, speaks volumes.

Fact is, the suicidal Arabs story lacks foundation.
there isn't anything solid under it.

and the idea that WTC1,2 & 7 should simply
"collapse" in the manner observed and people
are insisting that no explosives were involved,
but there isn't any documentation of explosives
or explosive residue ever having been looked for.

 

Sorry, but the unenlightened ones such as yourself who can't prove anything, know nothing of aircraft, flight, physics, building construction, or math are a little difficult to convince of anything other than magic.

 

Read the PENTTBOM report. It's there.

 

and the PENTTBOM report is to be found exactly where?
Oh I forgot, you have to process a foi act request to get it.
Right, & after more than a decade, and an important report
on what was (or was not) done requires a foi request to
get it ..... sure, you betcha, ..........

 

Untrue.

Here you go.
http://www.911myths.com/images/f/fd/FBI-Summary-PENTTBOMB.pdf

 

U R putting me on, right? .....

where in that link you posted does it say anything about
the FBI had tested for explosives or explosive residue
in the rubble of ground zero?

 

You have to read it ...

 

The arab hijackers has more than a solid foundation it is fact proven with evidence you cannot refute.

The collapse caused by fire and impact damage was not unlikely you only claim it was as an uneducated opinion.

The FBi did in fact test and look for evidence of explosives their reports are avialable to the publiac. Many of them have been posted on other threads on this forum.

Go look at them and stop wasting time with circular arguments and empty logic so you can pretend to look smart

 

It's as if you have to hold their hands and guide them to the information...

 

No surprise you and many others did not know about bld 7 the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission nobody can get around, for several years considering the fact the 9/11 coverup commission didnt even find it important enough to even list it in their report.

 

Wrong again. Building 7 is indeed mentioned in the Commision report.

 

You enlightened one believe that Build 7 cracked itself and fell to rubble in 7 seconds because of fire? Do you really believe it? The only one in the world to have done so... What other steel framed building ever collapsed because of fire? STEEL man STEEL. STRUCTURAL REDUNDANCY. And you go lecture people about engineering and stuff like that... There's been great fires in many similar buildings, in America and internationally.

 

"Many similar buildings"? Cite five buildings constructed in a similar fashion of WTC 7 that caught fire and burned for hours without collapsing of the steel bits.

Five of 'many'. Go for it.

 

Indeed there was. On this one I agree with NIST that it would endanger public safety because it would give many panicked depressive ones reasons to jump off their balcony while some 1 or 2 million would descend upon the White House demanding answers and might drag by the collar some White House personnel out into the street in the absence of those answers. This will mean accidents, street violence, no doubt.

 

This should be good.

 

It wasn't JUST because of fire,and the north tower gouged out a section of the south face of WTC 7,and it's already been established WTC 7 was NOT built in the normal way,because of the con-ed substation below it.

 

Sure.

One would be the AON Center in LA which is a tube structure like Building 7.
Another would be World Trade Center #1 itself in 1975. A tube like WTC7.
3. Then there's Meridian Plaza, Philadelphia (1991) Also a tube.
4. UNITIC Twin Towers, Sarajevo, (1996), very much tube-like.

5. Al Hafeet Tower, Dubai, 2013 (I believe retains much of the tube structure style but have to double check).