WaPo Reporter Does Exactly What Vivek Predicted in His Terrific Takedown of Lib Media Tactics

Don't ask us, ask the KKK

 

I don't think Vivek is a racist. But, I do believe he is an obnoxious blowhard.

 

So now Vivek is a KKK member? If it's guilt by association you want, then it's guilt by association you'll get. Do you support blm? If you do, do you recall when a blm leader said white people are subhumans?

 

You're never gonna let that go, are you? You guys on the left will milk that like you milked J6, Trayvon Martin and slavery.

Can you name a media outlet that hasn't been sued? Which lib networks did the below:

Edited the Zimmerman 911 call to make him sound like a racist?

Put out a bogus report on Trump that crashed the stock market?

Reported on Russia Russia Russia?

Had an hour long show on Trump's stolen tax returns?

Reported that Trump removed MLK's bust from the Oval Office?

Reported Sandman is a racist?

Said women over the age of 50 are past their prime?

Went all in on the Smollet hoax?

Went all in on Ferguson?

Says we are better off now than 4 years ago but we are too dumb to notice?

Totally ignores the border crisis....oops, 'manufactured border crisis?'

Doesn't call out KJP on her lies?

Stopped tracking lies when Biden took office?

Removed the china virus death count when Biden took office?

And on and on and on....but you and yours believe every lie they tell and every story they spin all while they ignore Biden's lapses. Has any left wing rag reported on Pelosi's questionable stock purchases?

 

Has any right wing media reported anything bad about the right wing?

 

What the hell does that have to do with Steven's question?

 

The NY Post has been doing negative stories on Trump lately.

 

Ramaswamy is almost as big a jackass as your pal Trump.

 

That's funny that you Democrats really hate a person of color when they leave the plantation.

Can you actually be specific about why you don't like him or is it just because he doesn't agree with your politics?

 

The post was tongue-in-cheek, don't have a conniption. I'm not a fan of BLM, but they do have a right to peacefully protest. No dem I know supports violence. If some BLMer is blowing off steam about whites, who have called blacks throughout history 'subhuman' going back 400 years, well, I don't condone it, but I'm not going to lose sleep over it. It's no where near as bad convincing 74 million people that Democrats stole the election.

 

That's a good excuse to try to excuse what you were posting

 

Yeah, nothings spells 'milk' like trump, before the first ballot was ever cast, and still says it 'the only way Democrats can win is if they rig the election', a milking that destroyed confidence in American democracy in the minds of some 75 million people. I'll do anything that has basis in fact to ruin Donald Trump for as long as he is a candidate and is alive poisoning the minds of the electorate.

Nothing on the scale as illuminated in the Dominion lawsuit.

Doesn't come close to the scale as illuminated in the Dominion lawsuit.

Mueller provided a valuable service to America.

Volume I: This volume focused on Russian interference in the 2016 election. It concluded that there were extensive efforts by the Russian government to interfere in the election, primarily through social media campaigns and hacking operations. The report detailed how the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm, had conducted a disinformation campaign on social media platforms to sow discord and influence American voters. It also outlined how Russian military intelligence had hacked and released information from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign officials.

Volume II: This volume examined potential obstruction of justice by President Trump. It outlined several instances where President Trump may have attempted to obstruct the investigation, including efforts to fire Special Counsel Mueller and attempts to curtail the investigation. The report did not reach a conclusion on whether President Trump had committed obstruction of justice but stated that it did not exonerate him. Attorney General William Barr subsequently stated that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had reviewed the evidence and concluded that the evidence was insufficient to establish that President Trump had committed obstruction of justice.

Did some in media believe Trump colluded with Russia, some did, of course, but the only accusers that matter are the DOJ, and they didn't accuse him of anything. IN fact, Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rosenstein, a republican, who was appointed by Trump, another republican. I believed that Trump was a Kremlin style 'useful idiot'. He still is, an unwitting pawn for Putin. Do I believe he colluded with Russia? Not directly, but he tried hard to stall the sanctions, refused to criticize Putin and, in fact, fawned over the guy, believed him over his intel staff, and Putin & Co popped corks and celebrated when Trump was elected, not to mention that he welcomed Russia's help, and did nothing to prevent them from interfering in our election. His campaign manager sold proprietary voter demographic data to a Russian spy, he invited 2 spies into the oval office and did not allow any American present, and the only way we got pictures from that visit was provided by a Russian photographer. During Trump's campaign, his staff made over 140 contacts to Russia. So, if any one believed he was Putin's personal puppet, I'm not losing any sleep over it.

No one knows if the tax returns submitted anonymously to Rachel Maddow were stolen.

How many less than truthful reportage do you want me to list regarding Joe Biden and democrats in general by RWM? Do you really want to get into this kind of pissing contest?

Do you?

You haven't actually made a valid point.

 

No, you just don't have a sense of humor.

And no, I'm not quitting my day job.

 

So, now MAGA is all about lying. Of course, that figures because Trump and the truth march different paths.

Geez, you MAGA types are so easily misled. Trump's policies weren't the answer because he never did anything about the more than ten million here illegally. Speaker Mike can go no further than Trump allows because Trump can pull the plug on him whenever he likes.

Your boy is a poodle. Trump probably has the power to block a budget deal.

How long will he last?

 

You have to have a day job besides posting here on political form in order to quit your day job

 

I'm not a Democrat.

I don't like MAGA politics. Ramaswamy supports MAGA, denies Trump tried to steal the election, and worst of all supports Trump election lies.

 

Ramaswamy panders to the flaming crackpots.

As conservative Republican Nikki Haley captured his impact on the GOP, “Every time I hear you, I feel a little bit dumber.”

 

When you pretend this is a reasonable inference (see above exchange), I wonder if you're engaging in serious debate.

Why don't we clear this up? Anyone who claims or implies another race is subhuman is a racist jackass.

 

So you're not a Democrat and you don't like him because he likes Trump... Got it

 

It literally directly answers the question, and goes beyond the initial request to include all forms of color discrimination.
That includes white supremacy.
Continue to be mad about nothing.

 

Nope, direct answer is YES.

 

Right. I don't like him because he supports a guy who tried to steal the 2020 election.

 

And you got a yes. So be happy about that.

 

Nope, yes is yes.

 

And you got a yes, so you can QQ more.