Was 9/11 an inside job?

Mr. Garrison is their leading demolitions expert.

 

http://www.ae911truth.org/

 

By the way, Richard Gage is founder of Architects & Engineers:



Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect of 25 years, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a 501(c)3 educational charity representing more than 2,000 degreed/licensed architects and engineers who have signed a petition calling for a new, independent investigation, with full subpoena power, into the destruction of the Twin Towers and the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11. The more than 17,000 non-A/E signatories include many scientists, attorneys, and other responsible, educated citizens in the US and abroad. They cite overwhelming evidence for explosive controlled demolition.

Mr. Gage has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, a parking structure, and 320,000 square feet of mid-rise office space—altogether with about 1,200 tons of steel framing.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/about-us.html

 

Vlad keeps dodging the question. I wonder what he's afraid of?

 

The 'highly credible' Mackey is none other than ...



This guy.

That's correct boys & girls .. the 'truthers' put their faith behind a cartoon elementary school teacher.
Now THAT'S highly credible.

 

Personally, I really don't care at all who is promoting what when it
comes to the TRUTH about 9/11/2001, I knew on that day
something is VERY wrong with this picture. First of all, in order to
get 2 skyscrapers to simply fall down in the manner observed,
the floors & columns/beams would all have to break at just the right
time, not too soon & not too late in order to keep the "collapse" event
balanced, because if it was not balanced, many tons of rubble would exit
one side of the building and simply drop away and end the process right
then & there. what are the odds that two 110 story buildings would simply
"collapse" in this manner? + the fact that WTC7 proved beyond any doubt
at all that Controlled Demolition was on the agenda that day.
Look at the north & west walls, many tons of material all dropping in unison
nice & neat like it was choreographed to do exactly that, an engineered demolition.

 

Yet the evidence and the math say otherwise. Pity you can't get past that.

 

What evidence & math? Please tell me, I'm interested in learning about this.

- - - Updated - - -

 

No,you're NOT,actually..

 

they dont have any! lol

- - - Updated - - -

kool lets see it

 

I object to your assumptions about what I think.
if you have the INFORMATION, please post it.

 

And I object to you urinating on the graves of the victims....

 

The greatest honor we can bestow upon the departed is to
seek truth and know the truth about what happened.

The truth hurts, LIES KILL!

abandon the lies

 

still urinating as well as spreading something else

 

obviously you are of the opinion that the 19 radical Arab hijackers story
is the absolute truth and anybody who challenges it is a heretic.

oh well .....

 

I'm of the opinion that YOUR opinions are trash.

 

regardless of your opinion of what I think,
do you ( or do you NOT ) believe, hijacked airliners used as weapons?

That is the question........

 

Of course they were: the preponderance of evidence proves it.

 

You actually have to ask that?...Have I not been clear? have you been paying attention?

 

Depends on how the sort algorithm is put together
( computer science 101 ...... )

 

We aren't discussing computer algorithm. Do try and keep up.

 

I was responding to a discussion of why 9/11 should or maybe should not be in the top most popular topics on this
( or any .... for that matter ) forum.

 

And you were off topic.

 

and your message # 9 was perfectly on topic?

 

Yes, perfectly.