Presumably when the "Independent scientists and other professionals have a myriad of 'problems' with NIST" go public. Or that's what you seem to be implying. Have any idea when that's going to happen?
No, I don't know that I do. I do admit that I don't understand the complacency with the American public to accept being lied to, but beyond that, I'm baffled as to how this nonsense remains fervent.
One could say the same for your blind trust of these mysterious "Independent scientists and other professionals" who "have a myriad of 'problems' with NIST" .
The facts are blindingly obvious! Look at the fact that 3 skyscrapers were destroyed in a manner that is not only highly suspicious but impossible without Controlled Demolition. total of 4 airliners destroyed in a manner that left behind only minimal "evidence" and extremely suspicious crash dynamics. Politicians who back away from any thought of an investigation and indeed when overwhelming pressure is brought to bear, the "investigation" is staffed with political hacks & people with obvious huge conflict of interest. Change will NOT come from on high CHANGE will happen when the PEOPLE get MAD AS HELL and not going to take it anymore!
I share your sentiment. However, people are so intentionally misled, and the information in so intentionally clouded, it's difficult for the public as a whole, to respond.
You're quite wrong, Boss. The information on this event is readily available and it's one of the most closely examined tragedies in history.
the fact that you do not grasp the magnitude of the event & the official story telling that goes with it, speaks volumes. - - - Updated - - - 9/11/2001 is the most poorly documented disaster since the invention of photography! That is a fact!
Oh I grasp the magnitude of the event,It's YOU who doesn't,with your wild theories,and things made of whole cloth..... And books documenting the disater are many,one of the best of them is 'aftermath' by Joel Meyerowitz - - - Updated - - - You're wrong.....
And we have the Pentagon... One of the most important buildings in the world. All there is to see is one video recording showing a single frame of something blurry.
And...somehow, we have nothing that shows anything. Strange too because, apparently the Secret Service thought enough ahead to confiscate everything from every camera on and around the Pentagon yet, they all yielded nothing showing any plane hitting anything. Just another crazy coincidence, I guess.
Why is it a coincedence that all the cameras around the pentagon weren't pointed at it,instead of pointing at what they were supposed to be pointed at?
Why did the Secret Service confiscate all of the images in, on or around the Pentagon? Perhaps because, they too thought that they could (should) show 'something'. But of course, they didn't show any plane hitting the Pentagon (or so we're supposed to believe). Mere coincidence that the only one they tried to 'pawn off' on the public, not only didn't show any plane (that was supposed to be just above the ground), instead showed 'something' other than a plane. Again, you dismiss the coincidence. I do not.
Why would treasury cops confiscate anything?..that was the FBI's job....And the camera at the pentagon likely took a shot every 2 seconds.
They didn't. Just another truther falsehood, Boss. Just because you're paid to believe it doesn't mean it's a fact.
'likely. Source? Fact is, the images were removed within minutes after the incident occurred. Just another coincidence though, I know.
Doesn't work that way, Boss. You think they would train better in your shill school. You made the claim that the Secret Service confiscated every image. It's up to you to provide evidence for your claim. You like to post falsehoods and then try to make others prove negatives. There was a similar tactic used by a shill who called himself a 'right winger, fraud'.
