What logic? If denying people a chance to manage finances to the point where they can break the poverty cycle is logic then I guess I am out. And Yes I do think it is the republicans who have consistently pandered to the big donors whilst screwing over constituents
Nope, the fetus isn't "poor" and it isn't being murdered...it can't be , it isn't a born person with rights...
FoxHastings said: ↑ NO one is murdering the poor.... So show who is murdering the poor.....or did you just have something in your eye? Or is it another statement by you that you can't back up....like all your other statements..??
No such thing as a “pro-abortionist”. If you really listened you would hear that we all would like to reduce the incidence of abortion - even PP is dedicated to that. It is just that most of us would prefer interventions that WORK like making LARCS easy and affordable whereas the so called “pro-life” group would rather interventions that try to control women
So does the welfare issue also justify sterilizing low income women? Or only aborting human fetuses in the womb.
OMGAWD....you STILL don't get the FACT that women are humans with RIGHTS......but leave it to you to think of some other way to treat women like cattle and control them... AND for the 1,000 time women do NOT need to "justify" abortion.
Even if they are murderers and it will prevent them from murdering again? I mean really really late-term abortions. You are aware they have forced dead-beat fathers to be sterilized before? I say if a woman keeps doing it over and over again, she has a problem.
I feel like this could be a misleading statistic. How likely are those women to ALREADY be below the poverty threshold at the time they became pregnant? Not only that but denying women an abortion does not force that woman to keep the baby. There is such a thing as adoption. Is it your claim that forcing a woman to be pregnant for 9 months makes her live in poverty 2 years later?