We get it, you hate Harris. Melania is what a woman is who marries for money. in fact, she's probably the only first lady in history that's a golddigger. Her husband fornicates with a pornstar while she is pregnant, then her husband fornicates with a playboy playmate just after she (newly wed) gives birth. What does she do? Nothing. Her husband is caught bragging about sexually assaulting women with impunity. What does she do? "Just boy talk', she says. Ergo, nothing. I was a professional portrait/wedding/model photographer for two decades, and Melania's full frontal is a horrible photo. She's just standing there, with her hand over her genitals. There are so many better poses where you don't have to be so blatant about covering genitals, it looks so tacky, and if I were her, I'd sue someone to get that shot off the internet. Another thing, to each her own, but if a woman were to come to be about advice on breast implants, I'd do my best to talk her out of it (for health reasons, if aesthetics are not an issue).. They rarely look good, at least to this photographer's eyes. I understand that a lot of guys like them, but that would not be me. She does look like she has them. She doesn't care about Trump, she just cares about his money. Trump doesn't care about women, he just cares if they make him look good. They are a perfect couple.
Sigh, you asked why Republicans weren't talking about the Big Guy withholding Ukraine funds until the election. The answer is that we learned from Hunter Biden's laptop, his business partners, and then bank records that Biden's family was accepting bribes for his influence and political favors. I have no idea how in the world you can claim they were not laundering money. We literally have bank transfer records and suspicious bank reports showing they funneled millions of dollars from overseas funds from corrupt foreign officials through shell companies. That's called money laundering. Additionally, we have evidence that Joe Biden held in-person meetings, such as lunch meetings, with corrupt overseas officials who paid bribes to his family, expecting his influence in return. The bribery statutes do not require Joe Biden to accept the bribes himself; ask Menendez about that. Additionally, we have statements of transfers from these overseas corrupt officials getting dispersed to Biden family bank accounts, including Joe Biden's personal account. On top of that, we have evidence that Biden's family was paying for his lifestyle and his bills while they were accepting these bribes and laundering money through shell companies. All of this is what we call, "evidence." You can try making the claim that it is not enough to convict Biden, but you must be honest and say there is direct evidence of money laundering. You must also be honest and say there is, at the very least, circumstantial evidence that Biden either benefitted and/or was aware of it. Dishonest arguments such as the ones you responded with here make having a discussion pointless.
Kamala is a ball of nothing wrapped in extreme cringe. She has no upside. Her biggest strength is that nobody takes her seriously enough for her to have a massive downside either.
Fake news. She clearly is incapable of handling the presidency, and that's her job. They do seem happy together.
You are confusing facts and opinions. The facts are what they are. The analysis of those facts is opinion and hence the opposing "truths." It isn't insanity. It is politics. OK, it's insanity like everything else political.
Nope I am not. Except the left doesn't rely on "alternative facts to prove their opinions ... unlike tRumpublicans. Yeah, and the "politics" of the house tRumpublicans is insane. Everything else in the country is quite sane compared to tRaitor tRump and his tRumpublicans.
her pick allowed Biden to pander to women and "people of color" showing both groups that gender/ethnicity counts more than merit to Biden
What has she accomplished? Not a damn thing unless count massive destruction of almost everything she's touched which if nothing else gives her something in common with every other member of the Biden maladministration.
Your own "proof" shows that Burisma was investigated by the prosecutor that Biden got fired. So, my statement was accurate. Granted, I did put an "ing" at the end of "investigate" rather than an "ed". But nothing was meant by it. Just depends on your POV. To me a "dormant" investigation is still a live investigation, not a closed one. Its just put on the back burner until such time as new evidence presents itself. So both uses of "ing" and "ed" are accurate. Just depends on your POV. Like I said, I saw a poster being flippant, I was flippant back. Nothing more to it and you're reading far more into it than there really is.
Clearly, you do not know what constitutes money laundering. the mere fact that an LLC has a bank account is not evidence of money laundering, If money is being hidden from the IRS, that's evasion, but not necessarily evidence of money laundering. Money laundering requires that the funds were illegally obtained. And there it is, right there. Comer & co has failed to prove how the money was illegally obtained. NOTE, failing to file with FARA doesn't mean the moneys was l earned by crime/ racketeering. How so? Because if the enterprize were earned by crime, registering with FARA wouldn't make it not a crime. Therefore, the flip side is also true, the failure to register with FARA doesn't prove the money were earned via racketeering. That,. my friend, you have to prove, and prove you haven't, nor has Comey, nor has anyone. What is blatantly clear to me is that you guys on the right do not understand what constitutes the following: 1. Money laundering 2. Influence peddling. Which explains why there are no indictments on these by US Atty Weiss,. because he MUST and HAS to know what they are, otherwise he would face disbarment. A congressman's job is not on the line for making these errors in judgement but a Special Counsel prosecutor, AG, etc., are. Capiche?
The Biden family business partners have said that Joe Biden was their "brand" and that political support was what they were selling. That requires FARA documentation. They did not do so because they didn't want anyone to know they were selling access to Joe Biden. It's illegal to sell a politician to corrupt foreign oligarchs without engaging with the FARA statutes. Failing to file with FARA is a crime. What in the world are you talking about????? FARA exists for this exact reason. As a country, we want law enforcement to be aware of people engaging in politics for profit overseas. You're the one who just laughably claimed FARA violations aren't crimes. Selling access to politicians and influence peddling is a crime unless you have registered with FARA. They were given "board" positions as a front for their influence peddling. They said they knew what they were doing, which was selling access to Joe Biden, and they did it under the guise of legitimate services that were not subject to FARA. That's illegal, and it's why they sent the funds through shell companies rather than directly to their bank accounts as they would legal income... hence, MONEY LAUNDERING! You don't funnel legal funds through shell companies. The whole point of two dozen shell companies was to conceal the source and destination of the illicit funds. It's highly inconvenient and inefficient to receive payments through a laundering operation. You don't do it for legitimate purposes. You don't do it for non-nefarious purposes.
She is a champion of climate change: She is a champion of community banks: She is a champion of gumbo: She is a champion of culture: She is a champion of population reduction: Spiering, Charlie. Amateur Hour: Kamala Harris in the White House (pp. 182-189). Threshold Editions. Kindle Edition.
comparing Reagan with Ms Get down with willie Brown is pretty silly. Kamalablow gave head to get ahead