What hit the Pentagon?

Discussion in '9/11' started by KarlMarx, Apr 18, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,538
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    pre-damaged light poles? ... really?
     
  2. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    9/11 truth is a logic-free zone.
     
  3. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whatever it was that hit the pentagon, it was NOT a 757, it was not flight 77. The 4 frames released by the government clearly show a vehicle too small to be a 757. The complete absence of any pictures or video from any of the other surveillance cameras shows that the government story cannot be proved.

    The first people on the scene commented that the crack in the building was too small to have just had a 757 fly through it. It was about 20 minutes later that the building fell down.

    The story wants me to believe that the airliner actually penetrated through several rings, and that is complete nonsense.

    The FDR for 77 was manipulated on the bench, according to an expert on FDRs, Dennis Cimino.

    The purpose of the attack there was to get rid of those auditors investigating missing funds, and that goal was achieved.
     
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,144
    Likes Received:
    3,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They show no such thing.

    They show an object the size of which is consistent with an airliner.

    The government story was proven the only debris found was from flight 77 many witnesses saw it
     
  5. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Before 9/11 the Pentagon was really an Octogon, all pictures of "Pentagon" from before the event are doctored.
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How can you say that with a straight face?

    http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
    (fifth picture from top)

    http://0911.voila.net/BionicAntboy.htm


    Witnesses can be planted.
    http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=10632

    There were witnesses who said they'd seen a much smaller plane. This is consistent with a mix of real witnesses and planted witnesses.

    It seems that a 757 flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it.

    The PentaCon - Smoking Gun Version
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bR-k96laOI


    Listen to what this lady says.
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=april+gallop+9+11


    The plane parts could have been planted very easily.
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    hh yes,April Gallup....this woman alone epitomizes truthers,,,claims there was a bomb in the pentagon,yet sued the airline for injuries received And the plane parts wee NOT planted,someone WOULD have noticed that happening.

    Spam/Fail
     
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    113
  9. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male

    Excuse me, but how do you figure that one?

    Yet there is no logical, plausible or practical alternative.

    Google, Pentagon attack. The 12 foot hole myth was started by a truther who confused the exit hole with the entry. It is that simple and this canard is dead.

    Why?


    LOLOL. Many others disagree with him. There is plenty for you to study on the internet on this subject.

    Another stupid lie. The money was never missing. Investigate it further. Seriously, just apeing Jones and Gage doesn't cut it. I could provide plenty of evidence to counter your irrational claims, but you have already told me you're not interested in evidence.
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,144
    Likes Received:
    3,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I say it with a straight face because it is fact .
    .

    No witnesses claimed anything else.

    No other debris was found.

    As always you do not have any evidence whstsoever
    Can be planted is fantasy. No evidence exists that they were planted

    Pilots for 911 truth is not a credible source. That is fact not opinion
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Of course,when everything is a conspiracy,even everyday,normal folk are 'in on it'


    So YES scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c,someone WOULD have noticed it,and it would NOT have been kept quiet
     
  12. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No logical, plausible or practical alternative? Are you a Boy Scout under age 18? Are you kidding?

    It is logical, plausible and practical to place charges to take out the congressional auditors working there, and that is just exactly what happened. Those auditors suffered the largest casualties, and the records were destroyed.

    Flight 77 flight data recorder was bogus. The entire story is bogus, the maneuver supposedly flown is impossible, and that is obvious to anybody being intellectually honest.
     
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You didn't address the proof I posted. I checked the math.
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7208375&postcount=243

    It's correct.


    You need to get informed on how the American media operate. This should help.

    William Schaap & Louis Wolff - Air date: 07-13-98
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=Wi5h3vZl6uo

    William Schaap - Part 1/8 - The Media, CIA, FBI & Disinfo.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbnxsPgcsH0

    http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/official_culture.htm
    http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman /Propaganda_System_One.html
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know how the American media operates,I spent over 25 years in it,and it's all about the bottom line,so nothing is ignored or hidden.
    Grow up.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,144
    Likes Received:
    3,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The evidence proves all of your assertions to be false
     
  16. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, not so.

    The evidence shows damage inconsistent with an airliner crash. The evidence suggests precise placement of charges. The results show a successful surgical strike against the threatening congressional auditors.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    pretty sloppy 'surgical strike'


    Do you even think before you post those fantasies?
     
  18. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Considering that most of the casualties at the pentagon were associated with those congressional auditors, I would say the strike was quite accurate, mission accomplished.
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You of course have proof of this?
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's funny. I know a journalist who says the info in post #63 reflects reality.
     
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No you don't...quit telling stories.
     
  22. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,133
    Likes Received:
    11,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's old news LS, old news indeed. What, 14 years ago?

    Look it up yourself if you're really curious. From your posts here you are not curious in the least as you seem to buy very much into the official story, no matter its falsehoods and inconsistencies.
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,144
    Likes Received:
    3,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are no such falsehoods or inconsistencies. You keep making up assertions without a shred of evidence.

    The damage to the pentagon was in fact quite consistent with a crashed airliner and no evidence of anything else hitting it or damaging it exists. If there were such evidence you could easily produce it. You cannot
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so,you have NO proof,then.

    What a shock.
     
  25. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male

    No, I'm not and save your dumbass ad homs. There is no logical, plausible or practical reason for the whole controlled demolition farce and the story is ridiculous. I hope that clears up your confusion.

    No, that is just a fantasy which you cannot prove.


    The money was never missing and the records were not destroyed. Where did you get that idiotic story? Cheney announced before the attacks that the accounting errors were being investigated, and now you tell us after this announcement he destroyed the records?

    Seriously?

    You are not intellectually honest as you declared the dismissal of any evidence at the outset, thus poisoning the well from the beginning. All you've done is parrot long dead memes with only a cursory understanding of the subject.

    The FDR from AA77 has never been declared 'bogus' by any reputable source. Hani Hanjour's manoeuvre was simple and the argument from incredulity has no foundation. Rob Balsamo from Pilot's for Truth is an idiot, so I'd be very careful with anything that fool posits.

    You are just winging it with silly tales that have no supporting evidence. Please try to raise the standard a little if you don't mind.
     

Share This Page