Nothing has harmed the " official " narrative. It is proven by vast evidence which you have seen and merely deny. No evidence of any sort disputes it.
There's a ton of evidence that disputes it. http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...-never-before-seen-photos.html#post1064863626
I posted something about the light poles in post #5. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=405804&p=1064937406#post1064937406 Tell me what you think.
I believe the evidence strongly suggests that the only thing that hit the light posts were cutting devices. Have you seen any videos from either Citizen Investigation Team or Pilots for 9/11 Truth regarding the Pentagon? Here is my personal favourite, one from CIT specifically investigating the only man who claims to have witnessed a light pole being knocked down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC3LRdjocmc
The poles were BENT,not cut Try again,and try not to demonize witnesses because you won't accept the truth
Maybe some were bent as well, but the evidence seems pretty strong that atleast one of them (Pole #4) was cut: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread418454/pg1 As to your notion that I am demonizing "witnesses" (the video is just about Lloyd England, so technically, that would be a single alleged witness), have you actually seen the documentary, or are you just saying that off the cuff?
There's nothing new that truthers don't try to use that I haven't seen before,the poles were knocked down,and any cutting sen on them was after the fact. There were dozens of witnesses on Virginia state route 27 who saw the plane hit the poles,AND the pentagon
I dealt with this at the top of post #5. There were also witnesses who said they'd seen a smaller plane. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=10632 This is consistent with there having been a mixture of planted witnesses and real ones.
Even if true, I don't care if you've seen it before. Believe it or not, this forum wasn't made just for you to see new stuff. And once again, I'm just supposed to take your word for it, right ? Name them then.
Once again the evidence has been shown over and over once again you have seen it and lie outright to pretend you have not. Once again they have been named once again you have read their names and you know it
Not sure if it was you or Lone who first came up with the lie that I had already "seen" the proof that the official story was true, but since you're either paroting him or restating this lie, I'll let you keep telling yourself this. A wise man once said, "never argue with someone who knows they're right".
No. You said there were dozens of witnesses who saw the plane hit the poles. I simply asked you to name these dozens of witnesses. I have a better idea. Go look up what religion you're peddling. Even Jehova's witnesses tried to present a case, however weak. You guys aren't even trying. But after a little thought, I've figured out why we're not even on the same page. You probably never saw the CIT documentary on Lloyd England, so I'll give you a hint: they make a compelling case that there are 0 witnesses other then Lloyd England who place the plane where Lloyd England was allegedly hit by the pole.
Stop lying. The case you ask for has been presented to you ad nauseum. You are willfully lying and pretending it has not. The evidence PROVES you to be foolish and wrong
