Just to set the tone, there was a scene where Karl Rove was to speak at some public event, and a woman ran up to the stage and declared that she was making a citizens arrest of a fugitive from justice. There was sort of a nervous laugh from the audience in general, and the MC of the gig called for security who then removed the citizen from the stage. Please be advised that any number of lawyers would agree that Karl Rove is indeed a fugitive from justice as is Richard Cheney & the shrub, as long as former President Bush doesn't travel to certain countries, he can say out of jail, but some places on this earth, he would be arrested on site. There is a problem here, we have serious documentation of criminal activity on the part of people who have been on the public pay-roll and at no time, has any enforcement action against any of these criminals been done. If "Joe nobody" were to break the law as do our "leaders" he would most certainly be busted and held accountable, but as we all know " if the President does it .... its not illegal " ..... right?
the topic had morphed into lawsuits against various individuals for criminal acts, and the fact that the rich & powerful get away with whatever they want. POWER CORRUPTS!
Yes. You made a specific claim. The ToS of this board require that you provide some evidence for said claims. I take it from your running that you have none.
He still doesn't get it. When a guy and his wife(Snopes) have more credibility that hundreds (I doubt 'thousands') of so called professionals, there's something wrong with those professionals.
Claim: Power Corrupts Look at the Nixon administration, and also the example of the rich & famous, when it comes to any high profile lawsuits or criminal prosecution. Who gets away with murder? Money buys you a lot when it comes to lawyers who will get you acquitted of serious criminal charges.
For someone who finds it ridiculously impossible to believe NO ONE has time for debate, Stndown hasn't returned to the thread he started...even though he logged into the forum last night: " Stndown is offline Join Date Mar 25 2014 Last Activity Yesterday 10:50 PM " It makes one wonder what he thought the point of his thread was.
I don't know why you need to wonder. I signed on and saw the same old tired propaganda and evasive maneuvering, and I just didn't fell like playing games so, I read the propaganda, and signed off. That help you?
Quoting two different posters and then attempting to draw a conclusion, as if both posts were from the same person. REALLY.......
on that subject, if you really think that I'm a sock of any other user or anything of the sort, please feel free to take it up with management and ask them to ban me, that way you can have the suppression that you desire. Have a nice day : )
I think it's interesting that one shows such preoccupation with who signs on and posting it, as some point of contention.
I see that genericBob is posting again. Maybe he can put to rest this "fear of debate" thing and finally answer my request: You wrote: "however your second reference is the infamous "Bazant" paper and that has already been proven to be a farce." Please link to the source explaining how this has been proven to be a farce. I apologize in advance if g-Bob did answer and I missed it.
Molten metal was found MONTHS after the event, and you didn't need any special or 'various light source' to see it. The fireman felt it. It was like molten radiated (glowing) metal that again, lasted for months. Why the direct attempt to mislead people with this fact?
