Many who are anti abortion are against all abortion. Clearly there is a difference between early on in a pregnancy and late term. What baffles me is those who equate a single celled zygote at conception to "a living human"/Child/Baby. Lifers seem unable to give any justification for the claim that a "baby" exists at conception.
There really isn't. Your initial premise is where you drove off in a ditch. We oppose age discrimination in my country. Science provides all the support we need. At what point does a new human life begin?
There really isn't. Your initial premise is where you drove off in a ditch. You keep making naked claims. Which is the point of the thread. How is there no difference in your mind, between the single cell at conception and "a living human" with billions of cells, a beating heart, brain function and so on. Just because a person says the sky is green, does not make it so.
Silly boy, A zygote is a new human being. Science proves this point. The very definition of the words human zygote is the first cell in the creation of a new human being. Look it up.
Your claim is that there is no difference between a zygote and "a living human". You give no justification for this claim.
There is nothing wrong with abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. There has to be a cut-off point at a certain stage, not sure how many weeks it is when the baby has developed enough to have feelings/emotions etc... Anyone see that pic of a baby smiling in their mothers womb?
That is not necessary. I am not aware of a SINGLE instance in which any of them have objected. If you have information to the contrary please post them so we may see it.
no, seriously. If the abortionists will find a person who was aborted, and that person states that being aborted is no big deal then I'm willing to listen.
I don't know of a single murder victim who complained either. So I guess you are cool with murder as well.
Yes, seriously can you name a single instance where an aborted fetus objected or complained? If not it is reasonable to conclude that it is OK.
Actually I am not cool with murder, so the only thing this line of reasoning proves that it IS moronic. I am not surprised that you are following it.
once you find a baby that has been aborted, and is now old enough to speak, please ask them if the abortion was a good thing. Or, those who love abortions should try one out on themseleves and see if it's a life altering event.
You are in the wrong thread.. try the "late term abortion" thread. In the early stages of pregnancy there is no living human .. no baby. There is no such thing as a baby that has been aborted in the early stages of pregnancy.
Naked claims are the fools argument. Nonsense is you repeating the same silly claim over and over again, even though you know you can not defend it. If you can not defend the claims you make, then stop making them. It is not a bad thing to be wrong once in awhile that is how we learn and get better.
hmmm lemme see, over here with have a baby getting killed- abortion over there we have a baby allowed to live- no abortion why not try an abortion on yourself and see if you like it? If you think aborting babies is such a good thing then practice what you preach.
A man cannot "try an abortion on himself". Many women have done so, in spite of the danger. Please use the word "abortion" appropriately. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abortion Definition of ABORTION 1: the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus: as a : spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus during the first 12 weeks of gestation compare miscarriage b : induced expulsion of a human fetus