When The Russian Hoax Is Exposed, Should The Democrats Be Held Accountable?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Esperance, May 24, 2017.

  1. ToddWB

    ToddWB Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    5,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yes.. or they'll try it again, and next time they may get away with it. Had Hillary won.. they'd have gotten away with it then. I do not think the deeply corrupt deep state and the Elitist can afford for Trump to uncover their corruption, I don't think we've seen the worst of this election cycle.. I honestly pray to my Lord that He'll allow another Trump victory.. we may be able to stop the slide of the USA into a totalitarian state.

    I hope that one grand strategy of Trump is to use every (Constitutional) means available to see the guilty prosecuted, once or because he no longer needs to run for reelection.
     
  2. hellofromwarsaw

    hellofromwarsaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,605
    Likes Received:
    692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was done in public. He told the Russians to hack Hillary's emails LOL. And the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 times, lied about it I never wrote anything down like mafiosos you're so proud of. Call it the Russian collusion hoax because everyone has admitted that the Russians helped him win. And he told them to. 60% of political coverage in 2016 was about emails that turned out to be absolutely meaningless. A disgrace.
     
  3. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    31,272
    Likes Received:
    16,945
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Special Counsel, a republican, was appointed by the Acting AG, a republican (appointed by the president), because of what the president, a republican, said to the FBI Director, a republican

    No charges were ever filed.

    If you are referring to impeachment charges, no trial was conducted so the 'acquittal' was not legitimate, in my opinion.

    So, your point is moot.

    I don't think a 'false charge' is a crime nor tort. The hole purpose of investigations and trials is to confirm, or exonerate suspicion ( assuming there is probable cause, and it was so ruled ), and either outcomes are successful outcomes, it's the system's design, so I think you misunderstand the system.


    .
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2020
  4. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    31,272
    Likes Received:
    16,945
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Jeez, how much more are we going to beat this dead horse? Get over it. There is not going to be any prosecutions, ever. There is nothing there but some fodder for the IG.

    SC was appointed by Rosenstein because of what Trump said to comey. That's what started the SC. The other investigations started by the FBI were not initiated by the steele dossier. Steele offered the dossier to Fusion GPS, an american firm, as 'raw intel' only, not as 'evidence'. the Carter Page surveillance really was a separate thing, and merely an expose on FBI sloppiness on FISA warrants, in general ( as their sloppiness wasn't limited to Page, which proves he, nor the president, was being singled out ).
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2020

Share This Page