White nationalists aim to take over tiny North Dakota town >>>MOD ALERT<<<

Well, there's a lovely little town in North Dakota now you can escape to.

 

Get me some ladies, a lot of alcohol, and a maternity ward. You'll have your white race

Until they get abortions, hmm - I may not have thought this through :/

 

Love the excuses. Racists do not broadcast their hate, ignorance, and bigotry because progressives have induced a societal stigma against said ignorance.

That is brilliant. Folks find racism repugnant and it is not the fault of the racist.

I think not. I think you accused me of dishonesty portraying your position as you admitted it.

 

We are a Democracy. We are not a Direct Democracy (which wouldn't work for a population size this large). Not all Democracy is mob rule, but Democracy is characterized by one important factor that includes America: the majority of the population has the power to the vote on the government.

We also are not a Republic because we are not an oligarchy where the minority that makes up the voting population denies the vote or any voice to the disenfranchised majority. The Founders did create such an immoral republic, but that ended with the 19th Amendment.

Harm that is identifiable outside of individual emotion reaction or bias. Basically, offending someone or hurting their feelings is not harm. Burning down their house is.

 

Not much of an improvement on racism, if one lovely little town in North Dakota is where one has to go to escape racism, now is it ?

 

Is that the expectation? Whites should start competing with Mexicans and Muslims and start recklessly having kids, even when they can't afford them? Just have as many kids as possible, let the tax payer foot the bill?

 

They're not excuses, at all. Political correctness has not even been the dominant view for 50 years. The country is much older than that. There's no telling how long it will remain dominant, but the more dysfunction that comes from an increasingly non-white population, the faster it will fall out of style. It's just a matter of time.

You think wrong. You misunderstood my post. I suggest you move on from your error.

 

Or if they start dating Ann Coulter.

 

But they haven't done that. Quite the contrary, what progressives have induced is exactly that hate, ignorance, and racial bigotry (in affirmative action), that they so hypocritically and pompously claim to have induced a societal stigma against. They ARE that hate, ignorance, and racial bigotry.

 

So racism is okay to escape "racism"?

- - - Updated - - -

So you figure you'll be able to start calling African-Americans the N-word openly and in public again soon?

 

Tie the tubes.

 

I mentioned no names. Any inference is of your own invention. I consider all racists, white supremacists and their ignorant ilk, to be filth. There, is that better?
"Filthy words" lol.

 

from my experience online with white nationalists, I believe it is a sliding scale of skin melanin...

 

We are still a republic today. If we were a Democracy, then the people would have just as much power in Government as their elected representatives, and they do not.

So a group taking over a town and preventing other people from different races from moving there is not causing objective harm. Good to know.

 

The supporters of affirmative action obviously believe that.

Why ? When millions of African-Americans happen to be White. This is why the term "African-American" to describe Black people, is a completely wrong terminology.

 

Sounded like an excuse to me, namely that racists can not broadcast their hate and ignorance out of fear that folks may find them ignorant. Seemed rather clear that the point of view is it is not the fault of racists for being racists, but the fault of others for judging racists as morally repugnant.

I would, if I made an error. Alas, you accused me of dishonestly portraying your position as the same that was admitted on your part in post 50.

 

President Obama must not allow those white racists to do that. Obama should arrest all of them and sentence them to live in the most infested black neighborhoods in America.

 

You keep confusing Democracy with Direct Democracy. We are a Representative Democracy.

We stopped being a republic when we ended the oligarchy in which white men (the minority of the population) had control over the majority of the population (women and minorities). With the enfranchisement of women in 1920, the majority of the population was finally represented in America.

If they use force to stop the rightful movement of people or their property, then they are causing objective harm. Simply being a member of another race causes no one harm. Making a law that prevents people from living in an area based on their race is a violation of individual rights.

 

We can argue over whether having a politically correct society is a good thing or not. The point is that it has not even been the dominant view in society for 50 years. It's new. Enjoy it while it lasts. Eventually there will be no political benefit to be had from hiding black criminality and shielding certain groups from criticism.

I did no such thing. You continue making mistakes.

 

HA HA. No "mate". Not my inference. Actually (as I've said many times in the forum) I never infer, insinuate, or imply anything, ever. No, dude. YOU INFERRED (YOUR inference) that I was all the nasty names you mentioned. That's what the expression "If the shoe fits" means. What's the matter ? Having a bit if trouble with the English language lately ?

PS - I consider all racists, Black supremacists, affirmative action supporter racists, and their ignorant ilk to be filth. But I don't go around calling them filthy names. I guess I have too much respect for the forum to do that.
The forum will decide. Besides me being disparaged by you, they were too. Their call as well as mine.

 

Why is it wrong? They are Americans with African ancestry. Tell me where I'm mistaken. You're Hispanic, but I'll bet you were never near Spain in your life.

 

We didn't stop being a republic. Our democratically elected leaders have more power in Government than the people who elected them. That alone destroys the idea that we are a Democracy. We also have laws that prevent certain people from voting. Our leaders made these laws, not the people.

Where in the Constitution, or in the Bill of Rights, does it say that people have the right to live wherever they want?

 

Nah, I tend to think that most folks have both a modicum of intelligence and decency, and will, going forward in the future, still find racists/separatists/nationalists morally repugnant.

I just find it deliciously amusing and surprisingly typical that white nationalists are blaming others for their own beliefs and actions.

With the implication I was mistaken on this before? Not at all. I think it is very clear that in an attempt to distance yourself form your previous claim of being a white nationalist you tried to claim I was being dishonest in my pointing out of your admission of being a white nationalist.

 

Report away; only a real genius (or a guilty conscience) self-identifies with a generalisation-unless, of course, you can direct me to where I insulted you personally. I note, by the way, that you omitted to mention white supremacists in your list of filth. Why might that be?
(You're not very good at this)

 

You're free to have faith in your ideology, which is still in its infancy. The generation that concocted the 1960's social revolution are still among us, and will be for some time. What comes after them is up in the air, at this point. It will depend on how badly they've screwed things up, and they are shaping up to be the worst generation that has ever existed.

That wasn't what I pointed out. You are mistaken.