Why are racists so afraid of being labled racist?

Academic is not "intellectual," any more than the Inquisition was motivated by the respected Christian virtues. Besides, most people who put up with their professors just to get a job despise those creeps. I'll just stick with experienced opinion and you can try to justify your delusion about academentia to the rest of the forum. After all, debaters don't try to convince each other. In the Presidential debates, was Obama trying to convince Romney to follow Democratic ideology?

One example of pre-ordained conclusion. Archaeologists found a scroll describing Black invaders as mindless savages, killing and destroying things for no reason, not even following the cruel rationale of war. Forced to dismiss it or be banned by their multicultie cult, the academics came up with the cover story that it was just war propaganda exaggerating the enemy's behavior to rally resistance. That could be, which is always a doubt that liars use. However, they shouldn't have tried to discredit it at all. Instead, if they really cared about logically discrediting it, they would have looked for other Egyptian war propaganda and shown that most enemies were portrayed as mindless bloodthirsty killers and destroyers of property. But they didn't bother, afraid they might discover the truth.

 

AEgyptian enemies were not 'black' or described as such. The enemies are explicitly described as Asiatics where as 'blacks' are described as 'rebels'. Just thought that needed to be added. Continue.

 

I think the 'conservative racist' (mostly a US phenomenon) is actually more bigoted against anyone who isn't in lockstep with their ideology.

Lip service is paid but most others are considered lesser beings.

It never ceases to amuse me that this group, the US conservative, comprise the tiniest of global minorities, which explains their 'whites are persecuted!' yelp.

They probably need an affirmative action bone thrown them from time to time.

 

That just shows the massive and effective intimidation by the race-baiters. If you call a Republican a Conservative, he'll say, "What's wrong with being a Conservative?" But if you call somebody with White Pride a "racist," he'll act just the way a Democrat would if you called him a Conservative, trying to make excuses. He is afraid to say, "What's wrong with being a racist?"

For the same reason, those who despise Feminism are still intimidated into using the clumsy "he or she" or the illogical they with a singular antecedent, all because emotional Nagologists are outraged over the fact that the traditional pronoun in a unisex sense is "he," which is related to here, "this place" and merely means "this person, whether male or female." Then prehistoric penis-envy piranhas demanded to be given the unnecessary word she, releasing a hurricane of gibberish.

 

Whatever. In the example I cited, they were from Kenya.

The point is, whenever behavior disgraces Blacks, degenerate misfits will find some excuse, accusation of exaggeration, or say that Whites acted the same way. These White race-traitors are bitter misfits out to discredit the achievements of the White race, which make Blacks and others look inferior. Since the sick Death Wish weaklings themselves are inferior, their Hate Whitey cult seeks to go above their personal deficiencies and claim moral superiority. Like Heisenberg covering up the incompetence of his failure to build an atomic bomb saying that he didn't want to bring that kind of weapon into the world. He was a dedicated Nazi, so he obviously didn't care about nuclear tyranny. The multiculties ought to love the Nazis, who only murdered White people.

 

That's quite a feat of talent to pack so much hate into such a small paragraph. I'm impressed.

 

Believe me, it wasn't the blacks who guilted and outsmarted the whites into self loathing and self destruction.

Turn on the boob tube and see always the intelligent woman, the wise black man......and the fumbling geeky white male.

I think we know who the brilliant campaign came from.

 

Hollywood was afraid of vengeful retribution if the blacks were not portrayed in more respectable story lines. And that was acceptable, but it has seemingly not been as successful a campaign as we would prefer - probably because blacks do not trust it, because it is produced by whites, or like the Cosby Show, and Fresh Prince, they act white and not black.

 

It has just been in the last 5 years that they have tacked on the disclaimer. At least they know they need to pretend the racist statements are not racist. Now, for them, everything is reverse racism. It is the neo-suffrage, minus the history of anyone holding them back. Don't point out they held minorities back...today in their upside down world that makes you the racist.

 

Well, the word doesn't mean much anymore since liberals throw it around loosely.

If you even state irrefutable facts and statistics about the black community, such as the high out-of-wedlock birth rate, you will be called a racist.

 

I just thought about something. During the primaries contest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Obama supporters got into the habit of calling Hillary supporters racist for not dumping her and signing on with Team Obama instead. That was an enlightening insight into how at least HALF of the far Left actually thinks. Anyway does that mean that if Hillary runs in 2016 that Obama supporters will then be advocating racism themselves?

Oh what a tangled web the Left wove when first they practiced to race-bait and race agitate for political purposes.

 

Exactly!

They are so blind to their own hypocrisy for that huge beam they have stuck in their eye.

 

Racist, like homophobe or denier are false labels applied to generally to have any real meaning. And my observation is that the intellectually vacant are the ones who buy intoi the false narrative.

No one dislikes Obama because he is black, they dislike him because he is a fricking America hating progressive leftist who is destroying our country.

Elect a real American like Ben Carson.

 

oh

not sure who or what youre referring to exactly.

 

Tolerating the intolerable is not a sign of moral superiority. It endangers a lot of good people.

 

Fighting intolerance with more intolerance. Good plan!

 

The point, which you are trying to evade, is that they were of a different race from the Egyptians. The invaders were mindless Black savages, just like we have seen in the riots and the daily ghetto life of gangbangers and hotheads who start violent fights over nothing, such as Trayvon Martin.

 

oh

wasnt evading anything and didnt realize you were making a point (what was it again) more an imaginary situation

dont know how you come to that conclusion, maybe too much time spent on stormfront maybe yes

that must be it, they type absolute jibberish to eachother all day and pass it off as intelligent discussion haha

 

Racism comes from the inability to experience apathy for sor someone who is different from themselves. This is why they generally associate with only people who share the same principles and beliefs as themselves. They only travel to regions that are of familiar to their customes which narrows their ability to experience apathy. This further strengthens their core beliefs and perceptions of others. It progresses to the point were anything that goes aginst their beliefs and perceptions is seen as an attack. The response to these (attacks)is to go to people who share the same feelings and consolidate with one another. They have never experienced anyone who disagrees with them so when you call them a racist it causes the latter. The definition of discrimination is never clear to them. So they responds always as if they were on the receiving end. They are afraid of being called a racist because implies the fact.

 

I just noted the terrorist threat in your signature. Noteworthy.

 

A nice political rant but it fails coming out of the gate.

If some extremists on the "right" had they're way there would be a race war. They've certainly been arming themselves and creating paramilitary groups that's only purpose is to wage a race war. The number of paramilitary anti-black racist so-called "patriot" militias soared with the election of President Obama.

First of all a president cannot eliminate corruption in government and anyone that believes a president can is an idiot. That is basically saying that "conservative Republicans are idiots" because they believed that President Obama could end corruption in government.

Next is the fact that even if Republicans believed that "candidate" Obama was going to end corruption in government they didn't believe that it was worth supporting because they voted for someone else.

Finally, there really hasn't been any corruption tied to the White House that I'm aware of but conservative House Republicans have wasted years in trying to fabricate stories of "corruption" but have failed miserably at it. There was no White House corruption related to Benghazi. There was no White House corruption related to the IRS targeting political action anti-tax groups seeking 501(c) tax exempt status to hide their donor lists from the public.

Is there a problem with the White House? IMHO there is but for the most part that problem was inherited by the Obama adminstration. NSA spying originated under Bush (and even before Bush). Project Fast and Furious was a part of the Operation Gun Runner program that started under President Bush. GITMO still exists (because Congress blocked it's closure) but the prison (torture) camp at GITMO was created by the Bush adminstration.

The "attacks on Obama" started before he was even elected and have continued unabated.

This entire argument was nothing but an attempt to change the subject. The problem isn't "overt" racism by the radical "right-wing" White Supremacists or White Nationalists that create the racist propaganda. The problem is all of the people that believe the racist propaganda that instills anti-black racial prejudice which results in discrimination and none of the political party leaders are addressing the prejudice in their own political party.

Democrats have a serious problem with anti-black racial prejudice within the Democratic Party and they're not addressing it. Two studies have established that slightly more than 30% of Democrats express explicit anti-black racial prejudice that leads to discrimination and that is a serious problem.

Independents, including the Libertarian Party, have a serious problem with anti-black racial prejudice within the Democratic Party and they're not addressing it. A 2012 study established that about 50% of "Independents" express explicit anti-black racial prejudice that leads to discrimination and that is a serious problem.

Republicans have a serious problem with anti-black racial prejudice within the Republicans Party and they're not addressing it. Two studies have established that slightly more than 70% of Republicans (71% in 2008 and 79% in 2012) express explicit anti-black racial prejudice that leads to discrimination and that is a serious problem.

Until our political leaders, regardless of political ideology, step up and say, "We have a serious problem with racial prejudice within our political party that leads to discrimination in America that we must address!" the problem only gets worse. Not only must the political leaders come forward and declare that the problem exists they need to actually start to do something about it.

 

Prove that those paramilitary "patriot militias" are "anti-black" and are motivated by Obama's race, and not by the fact that Obama is the most Marxist President in recent American history, committed to "fundamentally transforming America".

For a "libertarian" you sure regurgitate a lot of MSNBC left-wing talking points. Both of these stories are ongoing investigations. We know Obama lied about the Benghazi situation being a "spontaneous protest" and related to some Youtube video. As for Lerner, she may get tied to the White House through the course of the investigation, time will tell.

Was Bush attacked? Did you support those attacks?

If blacks weren't committing a disproportionately high amount of crime, people would have no reason to believe that they are. Ever think of that? You're asking people to deny reality and not react to it. That's irrational.

What if all of those people are right in their views? What if the problem is with the black community, and not with the people who notice the problems coming from the black community?

Do you live in an all white neighborhood by any chance? I noticed that the most anti-racist lovers of diversity live nowhere near it, personally.

 

[video=youtube;RQBGvLnijO0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQBGvLnijO0[/video]

 

No - it's a brilliant argument.

Thanks, Brewskier, for the added help. This is hilarious.

I doubt if he parks his bike in their neighborhoods.

A nice political rant but it fails coming out of the gate. What are they waiting for - Obama's third term???

Then what did "Change Washington" mean??? Which, by the way, is the central premise of my brilliant argument - if you could just answer it you could have won the debate.

Those were the smart Republicans.

The whole system is corrupt - it's not just the White House. When the Congress is in town they only work 3-4 days, and there are all kinds of other things that they are doing because we have no control over them.

The congressional committee hearings are not about prosecution - they are about gathering evidence.

You're defining them as corruption, and obviously, you do not believe it can be stopped - right? And a racist would say a black cannot stop it, can he???

Nobody who matters is saying anything like, "a black man does not have the intellectual ability to be President," otherwise they will be dismissed for racism. There were plenty of celebritards saying that Bush was an idiot - so if Obama cannot handle it, then he shouldn't have run and won.

Myself, and Louis Farrakhan, are the only Americans of any importance, who correctly recognize that blacks do not trust each other to organize community

And you are only worried about corruption in the White House - Shiva_TD, you are an amateur debater. You are describing a corruption, although, I believe that you are incorrect.

I know it is going to be difficult for you to accept this, but if you were as smart as you think you are, you would construct the legislation that corrects the racial injustice that you believe you see. As it is, you are of the belief that the politicians have to figure it out and write it up.

 

Im racist.

Most people wont admit to it though because it has a lot of baggage connected to it, like you are an evil bigot who wants to oppress minorities which is not true!