Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility: Only 1 of 9,136 Recent Peer-Revie

And this relates to climate change or global warming how?
Just posting graphs without an explanation of their significance is not very informative. What is the Hurricane Power Distribution Index? What does it measure? How is it determined? How does it relate to AGW theory?

 

LOL, you are the one that brought it up now you don't want to deal with it.

 

Not the point is it??? The fact remains that you proclaimed that NO people supporting your religion raises LOCAL... Wait I will put it your words... "...start a thread about local cold temperatures or record continental highs". You pretend that is NOT the case.

So far two of these THREE threads have been shown to neither record breaking, life time events or even just out of the ordinary. They were started DURING the events proclaiming such things (while people suffered) to score political points in total disregard of the truth (showing the TRUE nature of this issue).

Basically, YOUR comment was WRONG. It is cherry picking (just the blame laid on others) of weather events that are proclaimed to support AGW. When shown as not being, run and hide under the bed as the sky is falling... Wait until the heat has dropped then come out with another...

 

"I don't want to deal with it?" How about you first showing me how Hurricane Power Distribution Index is related to frequency and intensity of hurricanes? Then I'll "deal with it"!

 

It's time to admit that you're unable to link to one thread started by sceptics on those subjects.

Or can you link to some?

 

Instead of waffling, all you have to do is link to a peer reviewed paper stating that hurricanes are either more frequent or more intense.

What could be easier?

 

Dissipation.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hurricane+Power+Dissipation+Index