Woman gets abortion to fit into wedding dress

How ironic and hypocritical, claiming others are jumping to wild conclusions when you start you reply with "Typical abortionist", do you know that Fox is an Abortionist, or are you simply jumping to a wild conclusion?

Abortionist - a person who performs abortions - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abortionist Hey [MENTION=64619]FoxHastings[/MENTION] you kept your qualifications mighty quiet

You mean ridiculous in your opinion, jut because you think 95% of abortions are for "convenience" doesn't mean they are.

You really must tell us all how you know [MENTION=64619]FoxHastings[/MENTION] is an abortionist, and yes it is a form of slavery, you do know what slavery is don't you, what else would stopping a person from controlling their own body be other than a form of slavery?

nothing odd about it at all, a born child is not physically using another persons body, and injuring it in the process, to sustain their own life, a fetus is. Just because you fail to understand that doesn't make it any less of a reality.

 

The blog is just a lie, nothing else, and a stupid one at that.

 

You asked that question before, I have gone through it in great detail multiple times.

Abortion is the killing of a baby who has not committed any crime. The rapist committed the crime, not the baby - why should an innocent person be punished for a crime they did not commit?

If a man breaks into your house, injures you and injures a family member to the point the family member is an invalid and requires constant care from you, would you simply kill the family member because "it" has inconvenienced your lifestyle? Its the same with a baby.

 

Nooo, noo, noooo, you said that you would "allow" ( how quaint) a woman to have an abortion if she was raped, didn't you?


As you have been shown a fetus is aborted not a baby.


Then you say this amazing thing ! """ why should an innocent person be punished for a crime they did not commit?"""


But NOW you seem to imply a woman shouldn't be able to get an abortion if she was raped AND punishing the woman(the innocent person) for being raped ( a crime she did not commit) seems fine with you !!!!!!!!


If someone breaks into your house and cause you and/or your family harm do you believe you have a right to defend yourself?

Then why do you think pregnant women lose that right because they are pregnant....Pregnancy DOES harm women and neither YOU nor any other Anti-Choicer has EVER PROVEN OTHERWISE!!!!!!!!

 

You do know that a crime does not have to be committed in order for a person to defend themselves don't you? E.g.. a mentally incompetent person cannot commit a crime, that however does not, in anyway, change a person's right to defend themselves against a mentally incompetent person up to, and including, deadly force.

The foetus by injuring a female during pregnancy without her consent cannot be charged with any crime because it lacks the mens rea (guilty mind) that however does not in anyway lessen the right of the female to defend herself and under the equal protection clause the state has a duty to aid her in that defence. ... just as it does so for all born people.

 

To be fair, if that is the extent of her decision making abilities and priorities, then it was probably a better choice. Can only imagine what kind of sh/1bag mother she would be.

 

she's placed a price on that baby, and it's less than $15,000

as shallow as they come

 

IF there is any truth in the article (which is highly questionable) I would have no objection to her having an abortion because (1) she is getting the abortion before the fetus is a person and (2) she does not sound like a person who has the resources within her to be a good mother at this point in her life.

Is this what society has come to? No... it is what one Yahoo(ite) would have us believe one woman has done.

 

I think you mean by one fabricated person. .

Some random person posted in on Yahoo Answers. Can people really not spot obvious trolling?