Yes, we can prove that god does not exist.

Soooooo, so does that make a the Old Mo, better'n and more righteous than the New Mo?

 

I don't know, does it? Your arguing a point I never went near, I only ever made a literary point.

 

Okay then. thanks for the point and excuse my misunderstanding.

 

Someone (the OP I think, I'm too lazy to go back and check) referenced Moses when questioning the absurdity of supernatural people in the bible and I pointed out that the mythology about Moses has him as just a normal (aside from being royalty) guy. I was never making a theological argument.

 

It is to my understanding that the foremost book written on the subject of Theology is the 'Bible'. In that book, there is much said about Moses. Therefore, discussion about Moses would fall within the category of Theological. So, if you were not making a 'theological argument', then what type of argument were you making?

 

I was making a literary point. Keep up.

 

That is understood, as you are referencing a 'piece of literature' which specifically addresses the subject of Theology. However that also does not answer my question: "So, if you were not making a 'theological argument', then what type of argument were you making?"