Yet Another Federal Court Finds DOMA Section 3 Unconstitutional.

Isn't it both funny and pathetic how much the right wing extremists fear the gays? By somehow allowing gays to marry and have equal rights it will somehow do harm to other people?

Hmmm...Or is it simply just plain old hate and bigotry?

 

Wingnuts are so predictable and so booooring. Oh oh oh, its a liberal judge bla bla bla.

Its a judge nominated by Bush.

And seriously, if I hear one more nut throw out the "oh, there's nothing in the constitution about "fill in the blank"...." I think my head will explode.

Simplistic thinking from simple minds. Guess what, judges for many decades show your opinion is nonsense.

 

The "Irony Meter" just became an Atomic Bomb. Thermonuclear even...

 

Fear or disgust? There is a distinction. Most leftists would stare blankly at such ideas, but they are Obama voter so I never expect too much, that way I'm not disappointed.

 

Honestly who care if you are disgusted? Rights are rights.

 

Wingnuts are so predictable and so booooring. Oh oh oh, its a liberal judge bla bla bla.

Its a judge nominated by Bush.

And seriously, if I hear one more nut throw out the "oh, there's nothing in the constitution about "fill in the blank"...." I think my head will explode.

Simplistic thinking from simple minds. Guess what, judges for many decades show your opinion is nonsense.

 

What in the world are you talking about in this out of context retort to whatever idea?

 

The same old Gay Semantic Weapon(tm). Tell me something, if they "just want to be left alone" how come they want their silly sad pathetic pride parades and they insist in making the World orbit around their mental-sexual illness?

And got anything to say about this unchallengeable facts: http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm and http://www.gaynazis.com/ ??? Or the only thing you have is "Gay Semantic Weapons"(tm) and "Leftist Semantic Weapons"(tm)?

 

You're going to need more credible sources than "Defendthefamily.com" and "Gaynazis.com".

 

From the godfather of mind numbing idiocy like "All this is are leftist losers using unprincipled judges to justify their their unconstitutional actions of not upholding the law" blablabla.

I'm actually embarrassed for you. Don't you have some HIlariously racist Obama hatemails to send to like minded knuckle draggers?

 

LOL! One of the oldest argumentative weapons in the arsenal of people who have no arguments. The book is so unchallengeable that when it came out in 1995 the Gayocrats (and the New World Order) launched a massive campaign to discredit the book but they soon realized that the book is unchallengeable. Actually over 50% of the sources are...homosexual historians...lol.

 

The "Irony Meter" has just been upgraded from Thermonuclear weapon to Anti-Matter weapon. Got any other leftwing cliché to throw?

 

Two words. David Souter

Enjoy your fail.

So you can't debate it. We understand.

 

Rational Basis is a long-standing legal principle, though the usage here wasn't really codified until the mid 1930s.

It is very rare that a law is struck down on a Rational Basis review, but it does happen.

I think Stevens said it best, in CITY OF CLEBURNE, TEXAS v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER

It's considered the lowest level of scrutiny that a law must pass. Ironically, that excerpt is from a wonderful section on how you shouldn't think of them as levels.

 

That and the fact that I understand the conservative mind and its deepseated bigotry and scapegoating.

That bugs you, I'm sure.

 

Well, leftists are losers. They fail at everything all the time. And they are losers because they pick and choose what laws they will defend or not defend if their leftist loser agenda is contrary to that law. Therefore it is unconstitutional to do those things. proving that Maobama has violated his oath of office, that too, makes him a fricking loser. It has nothing to do with his race, but with the content of his character. Someone wise and a real American said that. Attempted insult noted, and duely ignored, because I know it was motivated by hate and not actual thought processes.

 

Nope.

Your attitude bugs me just like certain conservative posters and their attitude bugs me. Generalizing about anyone with rage-a-tronic precision and little to no specific facts to back you up just more rage is an annoyance.

I support gay marriage and donate an hour here and there to make it a reality. If you were to post something like "Excellent news! Way to go guys!" you wouldn't hear a peep out of me.

Everything you say is so negative and judgmental that it is just creepy and off-putting, but...maybe that's just an Internet person and you're a real nice guy in person.

**shrugs**

 

...methinks that leftists have become unhinged...

If it were not for unprincipled leftist loser judges, gay marriage would have died the death it so richly deserves long ago.

 

I support gay something, as long as its not called marriage, I'd be cool with that.

 

I don't see why Neocons keep fighting a bigoted battle tooth and nail, when everyone knows, including themselves, that they're going to lose in the long run.

 

In the courts. In the polls, not!

 

Anti Gay support has dwindled greatly over the years, and the battle will be over within 10 years or so, when a lot of 70+ anti gay voters die and pro gay people 8 years old and older will be at least 18.

 

I think most people are so fricking tired of hearing gay people snivel that they are denied rights, through the hi-jacked once noble civil rights movement degenerativly adapted to include gays, that they are not in reality denied, that they are just throwing their hands up in disgust and surrendering to their false claims just so they will ****.

 

This is what happens when you give liberal judges posts for life. Example:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/klyn_perv_only_gets_years_behind_hc4AWS4asm6tjFT2FcZXkO

 

The entire core of the National-Socialist was "butch" homosexual (aka macho homosexual) and National-Socialism was an attempt to recreate ancient homo-erotic, super-macho, anti-feminine, pederastic, hyper-militarist, fascist Greece and Rome (in their final decadent centuries). If that is not significant i don't know what is.

The last 6 Roman Emperors were homosexuals, Nero had 2 weedings with 2 boys one of them was very public and with massive public celebrations. Nero was a super-macho, woman-hating butch homosexual who had a very strong inclination towards militarism and wars. Homo dominated Greece, Rome and Nazi Germany was as warmongering as it gets. If that is not significant i don't know what is.

"Gay" romances are riddled with super-macho, fascist militarist ideology and they are often about 2 macho gay lovers going to do glorious and manly battle to defend a glorious homo-erotic civilization. If that is not significant i don't know what is.

I could go on and on and on. I repeat, if there was nothing wrong with this mental-sexual illness it would have been accepted loooooooong time ago. It is incredibly dangerous but it is also a sign that a society has major major problems since +95% of homosexuals either came from a non-optimal family structure and/or ambient and/or were raped as children. The "born this way" is a big load of crap.