There is a four letter word for someone both lacking in both intellectual and judgement that come to my mind but if I apply it here I am sure I would be breaking a rule of this website.
Nope. Trump would have beat him. Obama on Regrets He Has Over the Destruction of the Democratic Party: It's Too Bad I'm Only One Man, and Couldn't Simultaneously Organize the DNC While Also Doing Such a Terrific Job as Commander in Chief http://hotair.com/archives/2017/01/...tly-responsible-for-my-party-being-destroyed/ The funniest part of this answer is how it develops, of course, into him extolling his own abilities. "Partly because my docket was really full here, I couldn't be both chief organizer of the Democratic Party and function as commander in chief and president of the United States," he told Stephanopoulos. "We did not begin what I think needs to happen over the long haul, and that is rebuild the Democratic Party at the ground level." If only he'd been able to juggle both roles, president and "chief organizer" (whatever that means), the Democrat Party wouldnt have lost a thousand farking seats at the federal and state level since 2009? I dont know how to read that answer except as him saying (a) the current "chief organizers" of the party are utter incompetents and (b) theres no problem with the Democrat Party that a little more Barack Obama couldnt have cured. The man does not want for self-regard, though he desperately wants for a reason for that self-regard.
WOW WOW I learned a new thing about the Narcissist. Obama is a classic narcissist. And you simply confirmed it.
When I see a KKK, I won't rush out to give them an answer they love. The sign as I said, is a great sign. - - - Updated - - - When republicans governed CA my state, I believe we were at that time ranked number 5.
Yet I have often read high praise for Carter who as the poll shows had a low rating. I happen to believe that G.W. Bush will be judged by historians a lot higher than that poll shows. This country has so many ignorant people, it is difficult for an informed voter to pay a lot of attention to the Gallup poll. Give you an example. Polls are taken and they come as a surprise to the individual. Most people don't spend their day dwelling on presidents. Most of us have a life that really excudes deep thought about sitting presidents or even those that departed in a fairly short period. As to Obama, a ranking today is meaningless. Once proper vetting is done of things he claims he achieved, a much better assessment can be made. Bush is a classic case. Bush accepted at face value the findings by the CIA. And today Trump is being trashed for not toeing the line for the CIA. Thus it is claimed wrong for Bush to follow the CIA yet correct that Obama does.
