Z Never Had A Broken Nose

I think it can legitimately be argued this OP is Broken.
By assuming in a Lefty way to refute something that may be entirely true.
No different than the way it was Assumed Zimmerman was Feigning injury because there was
No visible blood or scaring when he was being led into the Sanford Police Dept.
in that Surveillance Video.

 

You keep inventing straw men when you respond so you should really hold back on advising other people when to post and on which subject.

 

There is no proof of a broken nose as so many of you claimed for so many weeks. In light of that fact, you pretend that false claim wasn't repeated ad nausuem.

 

Did you ever find the proof Reuters invented "white Hispanic" just for this case?

(havent you figured out your opinion is meaningless? lol....)

 

The point is, people who are pansies should not be going around chasing people at night if their only defense is a gun. If you can't protect yourself with out killing someone, stay in the car and call the police.

 

That 711 Video shows a thin black man who is quite big.With the Hoodie it
is intimidating make no mistake.Add into the mix that Trayvon was around
170 lbs and not nearly as light skinned as portrayed.Yes,they made his Gray Hoodie
photo Much lighter.Plus those Gold Teeth and Voila.Another Mike Tyson wanabee.

 

The bulk of info is against Z as it undermines the claim of a broken nose, we find out his text messages are part of the evidence, and that the phone witness heard T say "get off get off" just before the phone went dead. There is a lot of other evidence but since you implied the 7/11 story was false from the beginning, it's clear to see.........a lot about you......

 

Do you even know what a straw man is? (actually, the previous question was a strawman).

I have addressed your stance in each and every one of my posts (except where I suggested you stop making yourself look foolish). FYI, those are not strawmen.

 

The Mike Tyson wanabee was not as tough as he thought and was unable to stop a bullet!

 

The Lefties seldom get anything correct. Their emotions always cloud their reason.

 

Not that I disagree, but "chasing people at night" as a person the community looks towards to stop the burglaries in the area is not a crime....bad judgement maybe, but not a crime.

One of the investigators mention that this situation could have been avoidable and he is right. However, World War II could have been avoidable as well. Point is that bad things happen that could be avoidable. It does not make the actions criminal.

 

GZ did the right thing and saved the world from the actions and future acts of another violent criminal.

 

Z is 5"9 and 185 pounds. So they were close to the same height and Z had at least thirty pounds over him. It doesn't look like Z tried to fight at all and that will hurt him at trial as it shows after he confronted T, he shot him.

 

Chasing people at night is not his job. It's no ones job but the police unless you see someone in immediate danger or someone committing a crime. What Z did is harassment and I don't know of any man from 15-70 years old who would not be confrontational to someone that is following them. Not everyone would just start throwing punches but no one would be happy that someone is tracking them at night.

And it's instigating. Trayvon could have easily made a case that he felt threatened. Especially since Zimmerman acknowledges that Trayvon was running and that he was in pursuit of him.

 

So that "innocent until proven guilty" line from Z supporters doesn't apply to T? Your racist ignorant comments show the quality of character in those defending Z.

 

Yea yea, we understand by your incessant racist remarks about Obama and black people that you are happy. It would be best to just keep quiet though. No one likes racists.

 

The prosecution can easily prove T was in fear before any physical contact and that fear was solely by the actions of Z, especially when he failed to identify himself.

 

This thread is about your false claim and self indictment.


_

 

This many threads on the topic and you still cant get this right?

 

Exactly. The evidence is not good for Z. The one phone conversation with the operator is all the prosecution needs. He was in active pursuit of Trayvon, regardless of how the altercation happened when they did come face to face, it was Z who was doing the chasing. What he did was harassment and can be deemed as instigating. I don't condone Trayvon's actions and not sticking up for thug mentality, but when you go chasing people at night, you better be ready for a fight when they confront you for being a creeper.

 

Given your history I suspect you are creating a massive strawman based on your own selective reading.

2 what the (*)(*)(*)(*) does that have to do with anything here.

 

Liberals and their first cousins, the socialists are known to make up facts out of thin air in an attempt to support their incorrect positions.

 

Please do not take SkyStrykers opinion on anything especially law. He is legal opinions are beyond clueless.

 

Zimmerman suspected that a crime was being committed are was about to be committed which would be logical based on the history of the community where an average of 1 burglary was committed every day.

Being confrontational does not equate to becoming violent. Bottom line is that a concerned citizen asking a person what the are doing in the community is not against the law and does not constitute as "stalking"....especially in an area that has a history of crime. If TM physically attacked Zimmerman first, Zimmerman had every right to protect himself.

And if Zimmerman initiated the violence, TM would have been justified in doing what he needed to do to protect himself.