Z Never Had A Broken Nose

The medical report from his doctor states "...we discussed that it was likely broken..." and noted no septal deviation. The latter is not necessary for a broken nose but it shows the limited injury. Since the report says "we discussed" that means Z himself contributed to the claim his nose was broken.

It is also important to note Z did not go to the doctor due to pain but only to receive "clearance" to go to work. This makes no sense considering the fact the paramedics cleared him ten minutes after the shooting. Since Z's dad was a magistrate he knew the process and told Z to go to the family doctor. Z didn't want to go to a doctor that he would have no influence over for the report. He went to the doctor at 11 am which was at least 8 hours after leaving the police station. Draw your own conclusions.

Several Z supporters claimed for weeks he had a broken nose and even after the release of the medical report that was supposed to prove it was broken, none have admitted their error. We also have a pic of Z's face at least an hour after the shooting and his nose does not look broken at all.

The autopsy report for T states aside from the gunshot the only other injury was a small abrasion on his left ring finger. This supports the statement by the funeral director stating it didn't look like T was in a fight at all.

Now that the medical reports have not supported the claims of a severe beating or a broken nose, what false claims will Z supporters try to sell next?0

 

As most any Kid,even in high school can attest a broken nose doesn't exactly
require the same attention as say a broken arm.
I had a broken arm when I was a 3rd grader.I fell out of a tree { The branch I
used to climb snapped }.It hurt terribly as I was in a state of shock.
I was yelping hurt.
I have broke my nose more than once and never had it set.I dunno maybe a
nose is more cartilage than bone.
But most kids have had a bloody nose in their scrapes growing up.Probably a
lot of broken nose as well.

I was waiting for this little attack on the veracity of Zimmerman's injuries.
I mean,originally we were to assume he had NONE.Like Not a drop of blood.
The lengths lefties will go in order to prop-up their cause.

 

So are you saying his black eyes were caused by Trayvon punching him in the eyes?

 

But Oh no how could that possibly be.Little Trayvon a near model student
was definately not capable of being any aggressor.In fact there wasn't
even a confrontation because that would have to indicate Little Trayvon was
involved in something that he was incapable of even remotely being a part of.
I mean how could Little Trayvon possibly have let himself get involved in any
confrontation,let alone any scuffle,since he had school the next day,and all.
I mean,not the next day ... exactly.On account Little Trayvon got suspended for
being tardy because he was helping a little old lady cross the street the week before
and she was particularly slow that morn.

 

No, like Maxine Waters speckulated, he probably punched himself in the face.

 

Can we just wait until the trial starts?

 

Why is that what MSNBC,ABC,CNN plus Al Sharpton,Jessie Jackson and the
New Black Panther Party DID.
I know that could be considered a trick question.

 

For weeks Z supporters have been claiming Z suffered a broken nose and said the medical report would prove that. The medical report proves the opposite. Since his own doctor examined him and only speculated, with Z's contribution, that it was broken, then obviously it was not broken.

The important part of this is Z's claim that T knocked him down with a punch to the nose. There is no way a punch in the nose is powerful enough to knock down a 185 pound man and not have a broken nose. There was also no septal deviation.

 

The OP is not about treatment for a broken nose. It is pointing out the medical report does not state Z had a broken nose. But I'm sure that won't slow some of you down in repeating the false claim he had a broken nose..

 

I broke my nose last year, and had no septal deviation. X Rays proved it was broken.

But I could just not be a wuss and with stand a broken nose without being knocked down, maybe Z is just weak.

 

Just blacken eyes?

 

No this is just typical of Lefties.Just gnawing away at something,anything to makes bones over.
Even if Zimmerman went to The Mayo Clinic and got a confirmation that Zimmerman
did sustain a broke nose.Lefties would find something else to make bones about.
They never hold themself to the save standard they hold others on the Right.
Like Breitbart warned.The Left is gonna play the Race card at MSNBC.
But we shouldn't let them.We should demand that THEY live up to the same impossible
standards they demand of Righties on themselves.

 

Did you miss where I said in the OP septal deviation is not necessary for a broken nose?

 

His medical report proves there is no objective evidence he had a broken nose. You guys have been claiming for weeks the medical report would prove he had a broken nose. Now that the report is out you still ignore the facts.

 

Where's your link? This thread doesn't meet the minimum standards for thread creation and should be moved.

 

There is a picture of Z's face from the police station. Do you know what time that picture was taken?

 

Citation needed.


_

 

My eyes didn't blacken till a day or two later there guy. They blacken the same night generally when hit in the eyes. Kind of busts your speculation of the nose not being broken/

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zim...juries-trayvon/story?id=16353532#.T7prNUd5s5Q

On the left side of the page click on the video for Z's medical report. At :30 seconds in hit the pause button because it shows Z's actual medical report and you can see where the report states they "discussed" it is likely broken which means Z himself is a source for the claim of a broken nose.

Maybe you can find another reason to have the thread whacked since it proves Z did not have a broken nose?

 

Iam not speculating the nose was not broken. His medical report states they discussed it was "likely broken" which means there was no X ray and no medical proof it was broken.

So basically you don't know what time the picture was taken at the police station.

 

Your complete thread is irrelevant. The picture, the police report, and the doctor reports confirms that Z's face and the back of his head encountered some sort of trauma on that night. Whether his nose was actually broken or not does not matter. What matters is was he attacked by TM, and everything is pointing to the fact that TM DID attack Zimmerman.

 

Did you ever provide a citation proving your claim Reuters invented the term "white Hispanic" specifically for this case? Of course not. It's just a rock solid example you make false claims and refuse to back them up or retract them when proven wrong.

 

You are portraying your stance as it was never broken, as in the title of the thread. Now you ar back tracking.

The picture was taken that night. He was released for over a month till he was charged.

 

Do you have any idea how many times people repeatedly claimed Z had a broken nose? Or does it not matter when people make false claims to defend Z?

The injuries documented on Z help prove Z lied about fearing for his life. The autopsy on T helps prove he was not beating on Z as many have claimed.

The EMTs report stated Z's nose was tender, never even hints it was broken, and says he had minor bleeding. But we already knew it was minor since he didn't even need a single band aid ten minutes after the shooting.

 

I'm not backtracking on anything at all. His nose was never broken and there is no evidence proving it was broken. Obviously the damage wasn't even bad enough for his own family doctor to take an X-ray.

You are trying to dismiss the picture of Z's face because it does not show any swelling and definitely no evidence of a broken nose.