It is IMPOSSIBLE for fires to have brought Building 7 down in its own footprint. No amount of dancing around that issue will change the laws of physics. Every single vertical column has to give way at exactly the same time. Some of the columns were not anywhere near the fires. We know this for a fact. What is yet to be determined is what did bring the building down? That is a legitimate question to ask. There are many people who could answer questions. For example, the new Building 7 was under construction May 7, 2002. Investigators could ask David Childs of Skidmore, Owings and Merrill and designer James Carpenter, the designers of the new 52 story Building 7, when they were first approached to design the new building. September 12, 2001? I've never built a 52 story high tech high-rise building but 8 months seems rather fast to design, permit, and begin construction on such a complicated building. Your claim that the truther movement is not growing is bogus. Colorado PBS aired "Experts Speak Out" and it was one of their top shows. With such success it is my understanding that other TV stations across the nation are considering following their lead. If you haven't watched it yet, then you should. Over 40 professional high rise architects, engineers, contractors, and other building related professionals are showcased. They even have Richard Humenn P.E the original WTC chief electrical design engineer talk about the inter workings of the buildings. It is well worth watching if you have any interest in the truth. [video=youtube;X-V1CiuGMJo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo&feature=relmfu[/video]
Saw it, it's garbage. You completely missed the point of my post, and instead just sat on WTC7. You obviously fall into the latter category. JAQ away. Truth movement is dead, nothing you say will change that fact.
the new wtc 7 wasn't built quite the way you describe it...it wasn't started until october of 2002 AFTER the con ed substation had been rebuilt 2 years to design a building isn't so strange
As much trouble as you have given me in the last few days, I would prefer to hear from David Childs of Skidmore, Owings and Merrill and designer James Carpenter about when they were first contacted to rebuild Building 7. I do not trust the information you share.
And you distortion of the truth liars are a real pain in the ass for those of us looking to learn the truth.
Oh you mean like the truth of "free fall"?....or Controlled Demolition?..."no-planes"....ya know, all the "truths" that have no basis in fact?
I don't know anything about "no planes" but Shyam Sunder - NIST WTC Lead Investigator [video=youtube;X-V1CiuGMJo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo&feature=relmfu[/video] @ 1:05:00 The buildings came down in freefall according to the the government's lead WTC investigator. Was it mocking? Or was it truth? WTC Tower II in 9 seconds and WTC Tower I in 11 seconds... 9/11... 9/11... 9/11. The buildings took nearly 15 seconds to fall. IMO, Shyam Sunder was mocking the American people.
Ahhh another hallmark of troofers,blithely dismissing information without looking at it,or even looking FOR it.
NO, actually they didnt come down in free fall speed. If the had, you would see other debris falling faster than the building.
Honestly how do you get away with your flame baiting? "troofers?" The word is truthers. People asking questions to learn the truth.
The official explanation is that Building 7 went into free fall. That is the official NIST stance. You just watched the NIST WTC Lead Investigator claim that the WTC Buildings I and II came down in free fall. Are you claiming the official stance is wrong?
Ahhh another hallmark of LIARS, blithely dismissing information without looking at it,or even looking FOR it.
No, that's not the official stance. Please post where the NIST said the building went into "free fall".
You are losing. We are not whining. We are seekers of the truth. We will win. - - - Updated - - - You do your own homework. Page 45 of the Official NIST report on Building 7 clearly states that Building 7 went into freefall. The "Official Report."
The official position is that three WTC buildings came down in freefall. That is the "official position." I do not buy any of the official positions because even the official 9/11 Commissioners denied the official position. Yes, I do see debris falling faster than the building. It would be comforting if the "official story" matched the evidence. [video=youtube;Atju9lOAtn8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atju9lOAtn8[/video]
Show me up!...post the information from the NIST report saying the building collapsed in free fall speed. I challenge you. That is, of course, unless you can't.
Only thing you're liable to win is a one way ticket to a rubber room 'seekers of the truth' - - - Updated - - - He can't or won't,apparently....
As I thought. You have nothing. If you did, you would have posted it. Fact is, you're simply re-posting another bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim from another Twoofer. Maybe you stick closer to church-oriented social activities.
