Threats do not bother me. I am a little guy. If you guys kill me the truth will still be told. I am old enough to have enjoyed my life. Kill away. - - - Updated - - - You must be the girly girl of the group. Don't get me wrong girls. I like girls. What I am skeptical of is girly girl men.
What are you on about? Can't back up your claims so you start projecting your insecurities? Knock it off.
The laws of physics don't apply to the "official" BS story, do they? Notice how you dodge the point raised, and resort to nonsensical insults. You HOPE the truth movement is dead. IT ISN'T.
The answer I was given, is that I have to report them every single time. Again, certain players are seemingly granted certain privilege.
It wouldn't matter if you did post it. The specialists would do their best to bury it, through their normal routine. - - - Updated - - - They'd rather you post it, so they can pick it apart, in some fashion.
From page 45 of the NIST report on WTC 7: Further, they state in greater detail: Therefore, according to the source you provided, the north face of the roofline of WTC 7 only reached gravitational acceleration for 2.25 seconds, and was due to the buckled columns from earlier in the collapse.
NIST proved that WTC Building 7 was brought down with controlled demolition. This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories or 32.0 m (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s. The only possible way for a building to go into freefall is every single vertical column has to give way at precisely the same time. Fire can not do that. It is impossible. Only controlled demolition can accomplish that task. A new investigation with subpoena power into 9/11 is in order. Peter Jennings had foreknowledge of the events of 9/11. [video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video]
You are cherry picking from the report to try and make your point. That's not honest debate. NIST does not say the entire building achieved free fall, just the roof line of the north face. Thus your theorem of all the columns failing at once is unfounded. Read the entire page.
Only one part of WTC7 collapsed at free fall. As I have pointed out in other threads, this could very likely be due to the fact that the internal collapse, which had been well under way, pulled the facade down with it, accelerating it faster than normal.
The entire building went into freefall for 8 stories according to NIST. What building or demolition experience do you have? [video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video] That video proves building 7 controlled demolition and obfuscation by NIST along with prior knowledge by Brian Williams.
NIST agreed the entire building went into freefall for 8 stories. It is in the NIST report. 20 years as a building contractor. The fire codes are the most strict of the building codes because firemen sometimes have to go into burning buildings to rescue people. Architects, engineers, and contractors are not allowed, and do not want, to build structures that collapse from fire.
You'd think 20 years as a building contractor and you would actually be able to read a building performance report...
One thing is for certain. I would not trust the government to do another investigation. Government investigating itself has proven to be a failure. The truth will be told in the court of public opinion. Truthers are changing minds all across the country.
I live in NYC. I used to see the crowds of Truthers at the WTC on 9-11. those days are long over. The Truth Movement is dead. It lives only in the minds of CTists on internet forums like this one.
Ok another question for you, what happens if you get your new investigation and the results are exactly the same as we have now?
he believes any investigation, or study, or analysis that doesn't confirm his pre-conceived notions of truth, is a farse by the New World Order.
Probably, But all I'm asking for are answers from him I'm not asking difficult questions I just want an honest answer.
I am not asking for a new government investigation. If you investigated yourself would you incriminate yourself?
