Search in George Zimmerman case turns up weapons, ammunition

Could be since she is a conservative republican which would pretty much be par for the course. When it comes to Zimmerman the white part is what got him off which is also par for the course in the State of Florida.

 

I think it's more the fact that his victim was black. George may have been seen as white by many but if his victim was whiter than him, he'd probably be in prison.

 

What I can't understand is how the same people who criticize AA act naive or slow when you speak of the Good Ole Boy System which has been around since this country was founded and the actions from that program is not based on qualifications.

 

I agree 100% and even the folks who hate to admit it know its the truth.

 

You are partly correct except George "got off" because he didn't commit any crime.

 

Lol at the cons resorting to making obvious threats towards blacks.

If you are feeling froggy, then jump. It's that simple.

 

Zimmerman is following the OJ path. It's just a matter of time before he lands himself in prison.

And then his far right wing supporters will have egg splattered all over their faces. It's sad, and yet amusing at the same time.

 

Nope. . .that shot was fire in the air! And even if the bullet had hit someone (and it didn't!), since when do "accident" with firearms get you 20 years, when killing an unarmed teenager gets you NOTHING?

And when exactly was Martin convicted of a felony assault charge?

Zimmerman didn't serve 1/100th of the time he deserved in jail. . .but it will be coming, sooner or later! He is certainly demonstrating that that is his destiny and seems anxious to fulfill it!

 

Threats? No threats here just pointing out the obvious. History does repeat. Does that simple truth upset you?

 

Nah, not upset at all. I find it hilarious actually.

Like I said before, if you are feeling froggy, then jump. What are you waiting for?

 

Where did I say anything about myself in my post? You seem to be building quite a strawman. But I am sure some were skeptical in the day of the native americans. Oh well, the ones who are left can run casinos now.

 

I see the liberals here want to see someone fail and are happy to see it, instead of understanding the tragedy the whole thing is. That must be the empathy thing they brag about.

 

You are the one making clear and obvious threats, so this has everything to with you.

Me personally, I'll be laughing if the far right wing conservatives dare to get violent and try anything. The end result will be really ugly for them.

 

Nah, you are imagining things. I see you can't quote where I actually made any such "threats'. That is what is hilarious. But history does repeat and it will again.I don't control that.

 

Lol, you can dance around it all you want, but you know exactly what you were insinuating.

And you are right, history does repeat itself. So if far right wing cons were smart, they'd tread softly, instead of making threats.

 

Actually, the zimbots have display their tendency to "empathize" with the victim, an unarmed teenager shot to death by a coward, wannabe vigilante with a history of aggressive behavior. Talk about "understanding the tragedy the whole thing is. . . ." by calling the victim a thug and going to any extend to throw his memory and his family in the sewer!

Those who live in a glass house. . . .!

 

Yet you have failed to point out any such threat. You have failed to back up your claim. History does repeat and there is nothing any liberal can do about it. The stand your ground law stands. George is a free man who successfully defended himself against a violent punk. People have that right. There is no "threat" here. Well, except for the threat of those who want to be violent punks being thrown in prison or killed.

 

You are right about violent punks being thrown in prison or killed. Which is why the cons should tread softly, instead of making threats of violence.

 

Threats of violence? I still don't see any threat made. Reality isn't a threat. Neither is history. So I really don't see where you get that.

 

But your comments are consistent with a lack of integrity and a predilection for not-so-subtle attacks and threats.

My opinion of your posts is that they have dependably demonstrated NOTHING of any consequences, have not had ANY factual background, and have been met to bait and insult people rather than to bring any constructive element to ANY discussion.

If you don't really intent to present that image, I suggest that you may want to switch to more factual and less accusatory ways to express yourself in order to bring SOMETHING constructive to this (and other) threads.

Yep. . . that is my opinion!

 

Lol, you can try and dance around what you a said, but anyone with an ounce of integrity knows exactly what you were insinuating.

 

Talking about history isn't a "threat" and adds substance to any conversation. Does it bother you that you don't agree? While I am discussing history and making productive and thought provoking posts some want to do nothing but discuss others. That seems to be counter productive to the conversation.

 

Cons claiming blacks will end up like the Native Americans are in for a rude awakening if they were to try anything drastic. If they were smart, they'd tread softly and stop with these theats. If not, things could end up really ugly for them

 

History? Or a skewed, revised history?

Still the same story!

 

Really? Why not expound? I really don't think you are serious. You have failed to back up your claim and you refuse to further explain your position. No problem. Discussing me only shows the substance of your contribution to the conversation. You would rather discuss other posters than the topic at hand.