The Covid-19 Pandemic Does Not Exist

Looks like we have total failure to actually read the document properly.

Which are detailed in the report as:
"The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general. The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine. "

Epic failure on comprehension. I'm betting that you have spouted this crap many times before as some sort of trump-card so are invested in defending it at all costs.

Adverse event of special interest (AESI) | Pharmacovigilance (allaboutpharmacovigilance.org)

Which part of this, actually relevant to the report, do you not comprehend

Table 7 provides a summary review of cumulative cases within AESI categories in the Pfizer safety database.

 

Yes, "we" as in you, have a failure.

So you're interpreting this statement as the 1291 side effects as 'covid' related and not the injection? If so,
Since when did covid give anyone any of those side effects?

On your part, yes. Epic failure to understand or discern the document. As it clearly shows cases of individuals who have had some form of adverse effect via the injection and not from COVID, which you're insinuating it is.


Trying to do some alchemy on something that is not just so it can suit your paradigm.

 

Another childish poster.

I'm associating it exactly to what it is. A list of potential adverse reactions to both covid 19 and as it states vaccines in general. How does this confuse you?

Potential. Since when did the vaccine? Batshit references are inadmissible.

ALL recorded in Table 7. How can you be confused by this? Explain what you think Tabie 7 is.

Meh!

I was right. This is one of your "ahaa" pieces of junk that you need to defend at all costs. Never have I come across a conspiracy theorist who suddenly realizes they've been a bit dumb and admits it.

 

~ I feel another "lockdown" coming ...

 

You perceive it to be childish because you'd rather save face by stating what have. Rather than concede that I'm right.

Daily TelegraphNew Zealand
Wednesday, January 11, 2023

Guy Hatchard: Pfizer document concedes that there is a large increase in types of adverse event reaction to its vaccine

• Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world.
• Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported.
• Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.
• This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.
• We examine the implications for government.

Goodness me, MSM has a grasp on reality. It's a pity others don't or can't grasp it.

 

Yes, apparently a scary new variant of the variant of that variant and the variant of that variant and of that variant is running rampant in China.

 

No, your use of silly emoticons and your straight reverse on my statement. MEH!

Others being you. Explain what you think Table 7 is.

Now tell me the difference between your "1291" figure and then the 100+ listed. See if you can see the major numerical difference.

Table 7 is a list for Vaccine (BNT162b2). Specifically AESIs Evaluation for BNT162b2. If you are so lost in batshit that you are unable to see your error, what the hell are you even doing? Debate with you would be like debating a conspiracy theorist....oh wait!

 

Because that is what your responses deserve.

You obviously missed this part. Which is at the end of TABLE 7.

Here is the first page of the AESIs

144 on this page +/- 1. Based on this the calculation is 1296 ADVERSE EFFECTS LISTED ON 9 PAGES.

Can you see the numerical difference?

8 more pages like this

GOT ANY IDEA YET?

So you think I do a blanket coverage on all covid injections? They are all crap, but we are using Pfizer as the main perpetrator.
You also like to dodge responding to posts regarding who/what else is in corroborating with the fact that what I state is true, MSM in this case.
Someone else in the room is batshit crazy, it ain't me.

Let me know when you've worked it out.

Here are some more that share my sentiment about the Pfizer jab.

Confidential Pfizer Vaccine Document Published Online & It’s Really Bad
Pfizer’s confidential document shows adverse events reported following vaccination; it doesn’t demonstrate that the vaccine caused the events or is unsafe

 

Who is confused? "General vaccines". The study is about "(BNT162B2)" Did you miss that in the title of the document too?

Your trump card champ. Practising alchemy, turning one thing into another. Which it's not, but it is for you, create a new narrative to cover your tracks, hey?

It appears that you lack comprehension of what this document is about. As it clearly states what is in the title of the page.

It certainly can't be any clearer. However, if you now want to move your argument towards bullshit, then I've just proven another point. That is that Pfizer is misleading with mis and disinformation. Is that where you want to take it?

 

@Betamax101

Yes, at the beginning of Table 7. Did you miss that part?
You know, the list that fills one page and 8 others?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-does-not-exist.594344/page-7#post-1073963363

 

One AESI to the total. No. I read the report in its entirety, unlike you. I understand to what it refers, unlike you.

Already adressed!
Which are detailed in the report as:
"The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general. The AESI list is comprised of MedDRA PTs, HLTs, HLGTs or MedDRA SMQs and can be changed as appropriate based on the evolving safety profile of the vaccine. "

Indeed I can! On the one hand you have the actual recorded and yet to be updated list of 100+ and then you have the full AESI list covering COVID-19 and vaccines in general. As detailed in the damn report.

I knew right from the start! I was right. This is one of your "ahaa" pieces of junk that you need to defend at all costs. Never have I come across a conspiracy theorist who suddenly realizes they've been a bit dumb and admits it.

You are dodging the single most important thing about the report.

YOU DON'T EVEN READ YOUR OWN SOURCES!

"Similar claims also spread via the U.K. tabloid Express and the website Rebel News, identified as promoting propaganda and conspiracy theories by Media Bias/Fact Check, as well as video platforms. For example, political commentator Liz Wheeler claimed in this podcast that “these were side effects that Pfizer knew about”. Another example is a YouTube video by John Campbell, a retired nurse practitioner who previously spread misinformation about COVID-19, as earlier reviews by Health Feedback documented. Campbell’s video claiming that Pfizer’s document showed “1,223 [vaccine-]associated deaths” received more than 760,000 views and 24,000 engagements on Facebook.

But these claims are misleading. As this review explains below, the cited document doesn’t show known side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Instead, it collects data on adverse events reported following vaccination. On their own, these reports don’t demonstrate that the vaccine caused the adverse event and don’t provide evidence that the vaccine is unsafe."

To understand why the claims are misleading, it is important first to understand the difference between an “adverse event” and a “side effect”. The term “adverse event” describes any health problem that occurs after vaccination, regardless of whether the vaccine caused it. For example, a toothache in someone who received a vaccine would be considered an adverse event. However, a toothache can’t be attributed to vaccination. In contrast, the term “side effect” refers only to adverse events causally linked to the vaccine, such as an allergic reaction to a vaccine ingredient."

I quoted this section to YOU! Now for the 3rd time I ask you!


Explain what you think Table 7 is.

Three posts by you evading my simple request. The reason you cannot answer is because it is the very list of AESI's that pertain to the study! It lists them by number.

Again I pointed this out to YOU!

My trump card is knowing how to read a research paper properly, thoroughly and know what a damn appendix is used for.

Again, I pointed this out to you!

I want you to tell me what Table 7 is about. Can you do that?

 

And I asked you to answer a question and you failed. Until that time, you won't be getting an answer from me, because the recipient of the post cannot read the title of the document. It isn't too difficult, but it is if you're trying to convince yourself and others of it being something that it's not. However, those that want to deny what it is, live in a world of fantasy. Because so many have stated the same as I. It is only you who has a wildly weird perspective of what the document is, how differently do you perceive this title? It is what it is.
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2)

You need to reassess what you think you are reading. When you read your tv guide, do you think you're reading the bible or something? I've got no clue what you think you're reading, please, do tell.

 

You are lying. You have asked me no questions that I haven't addressed. You are afraid to answer my simple request because it basically owns your own ignorant argument.

Cue chicken noises. Seems to be a thing with conspiracy theorists, they simply are afraid to be wrong and have no integrity to admit their numerous failures.

You cannot reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. You are the last person I expect to be convinced of anything. You have invested too much of your time in batshit. You wear it like a soiled garment.

Safety in numbers? Is that your argument? None of the "many" are qualified or have any credibility.

I can read and understand the title, the problem is you cannot read and understand the report!

Results found in Table 7.

Nope, I need nothing of the sort. You need to quit being afraid to answer the simple request.

I'm reading and UNDERSTANDING the report and I know you don't have a clue.

What do you think table 7 is?

 

Since we both know you will never answer that because it shoots down your ignorant claim with a howitzer, I shall elaborate on the appendix 1 entry concerning AESI's.

Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) Definition | Law Insider
"An Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) (serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor’s product or programme, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor could be appropriate."

Adverse event of special interest (AESI) | Pharmacovigilance (allaboutpharmacovigilance.org)
"Identification of AESIs:
Identifying AESI usually involve searching through PTs, pre-defined SMQs that can be extracted using MedDRA PTs, or the CMQs that are specific to a study but are not pre-defined within MedDRA. "

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PMC (nih.gov)
"In March 2020, the Brighton Collaboration and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations partnership, Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC), created and subsequently updated a “priority list of potential adverse events of special interest relevant to COVID-19 vaccine trials.” [1] The list comprises adverse events of special interest (AESIs) based on the specific vaccine platform, adverse events associated with prior vaccines in general, theoretical associations based on animal models, and COVID-19 specific immunopathogenesis. "

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOW! Can you read? The AESI in the Pfizer appendix is a generic list from the above. The conclusions in Table 7 are what it found amongst the POTENTIAL adverse effects in the appendix. Now slap yourself on the forehead and logoff.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/more-nasa-lies.424608/#post-1065360721

 

I have to say, I had forgotten about that miniscule side issue where you failed to see something totally obvious and admitted it. I reiterate my point with the addition for "anything of significance"!

 

No, of course not. Who is the liar?

Of course, this doesn't ring any bells, hey?
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-does-not-exist.594344/page-7#post-1073962908

Or what about this one?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-does-not-exist.594344/page-7#post-1073963363

Yep, you sure do address every question. Who is lying?

 

You are. Once again you cowardly avoid my simple question. It's astounding inasmuch as we both know why! You completely lost this argument and you are terrified to admit it!

It rings bells that make no noise.

Irrelevant and no. So that was your outstanding question? MEH!

Irrelevant and bullshit uninformed batshit opinion. Your claim is that the generic AESI list in the appendix is a list of ACTUAL side effects. That is batshit and ignorant observation.

You simply have no clue what you are doing. NONE of your links corroborated your clueless "ahaa moment" with the report Appendix.

Thankfully I'm not in any room with you and your claims are batshit. You are just very uninformed and gullible.

Oh, another one of your "questions". I already answered this. Shall I fetch my response?

Spam already addressed, shall I fetch it for you?

Spam already addressed in full. You appear to be struggling here.

You are lying. You asked that just above. Now, are you going to keep on being a chicken? You didn't even read my last posts which totally own your idiotic claim:
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-does-not-exist.594344/page-7#post-1073963942
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-does-not-exist.594344/page-7#post-1073963956

So two concise posts completely ignored and this very, very simple request!

What do you think table 7 is?

 

Well, until you address them, guess what?
It isn't cowardly on my part, as I've answered the majority of your stupid questions. If you want an answer for it, address what I've asked because they were posted before your Table 7 bullshit.
Terrified?
I am astounded at your ability to make stuff up that is pure fantasy. Lost the argument, this is your tactic, thinking you can win via atrocity. Doesn't work for me, keep going you're doing great!

 

"The Covid-19 Pandemic Does Not Exist"

then why did Trump declare and national emergency and issue shutdown and reopen guidelines

 

Because he took onboard poor advice from Pfauci, which was part of the plan, by Pfauci & Co.

 

What a troll. Gets his stupid claim torn apart and runs away. You will use every evasive tactic at your disposal to avoid answering both posts and the stunning slam dunk and simple question.

What is Table 7?
List outstanding questions. Cue chicken noises.

 

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers. Socrates

You've been doing a lot of it.

Who's running, still here, just waiting?

 

~ Yes , correct. According to Dr. Deborah Birx they purposely lied to Trump about a two-week "pause to slow the spread " — knowing full well that Trump would never agree to prolonged lockdowns.
Wondering why George Stephanopoulos does not interview this frontline manager of the covid-19 debacle .. ? '

 

List them.

Not the one that matters!
Your answers so far are testimony to your ignorance in general about research papers.

Liar. I've answered your claim in extensive detail. Table 7 bullshit? Run away because you know the game is up!

Seems so. If you were so convinced of your batshit, you would a) have fully read the report b) understood it! And c) had a damn answer first the most obvious reason why your claim is batshit in the first place.

Answer properly my two posts and tell all your peers what Table 7 is!