You cited nothing in this post: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...s-on-abortion.580016/page-182#post-1074124070
Don't YOU believe that it's just a clump of cells, at least at a certain point in the pregnancy? Like, one month in?
Again, I didn't make the claim that there are no kids in the system. Why is it only pro-life people who should fix the problems with the adoption system? No, I'm not saying that it should necessarily be easier to adopt. I'm simply stating the reason why there are lots of kids in the system even though there are plenty of heterosexual couples who would like to adopt. Again, you're incorrect that there is a shortage. There are plenty of heterosexual couples who would like to adopt, regardless of their position on abortion. I'm sure that there are plenty of pro-choice couple's too. After all, adoption is not just something that religious conservatives do. How does that mean "second class citizen?"
Sure I do. I just don't believe that it has anything at all to do with abortion. Correct. Oh, are they conscious?
Well, she has obviously lived more life than the fetus and so has more value. Not to mention the people who rely on her, like kids.
Uh, NO, you haven't ...and if you had you could have explained it here but DODGED and DUCKED answering it twice (now three times ) Explain why you think a fetus due to rape can be killed but not one due to consensual sex ????
Please remember that it is highly enjoyable placing people's positions under scrutiny only for them to be totally unable to stand by and defend those positions!
Please remember that it is highly enjoyable placing people's positions under scrutiny only for them to be totally unable to stand by and defend those positions!
Yes, and YOU could have done a copy and paste of your explanation as to why you would make an exception for rape.....but you didn't
""""Where is the child? It is over there.""" What TF would "It is over their " mean ???? It is over their WHAT? Gee, sure seems like an important point to you ....or just dodging...