Man divorced wife because she chose to abort his child

Getting her tubes tied is a permanent thing to do. If she wants to have children in the future, that wouldn’t even be acceptable. Most doctors won’t even tie a woman’s tubes if she’s in her 20s and 30s and doesn’t have kids because they all expect you to change your mind..

 

So, a 6 week foetus is somehow a “child”?

 

And bloody invasive. Don’t you love those putting the entire responsibility of pregnancy prevention on the woman?

 

Bowerbird even YOU was a 6 week gestation developing unborn child at one time. And if your mother had an abortion when you were that age.....you wouldn't be here enjoying this forum. You would have died.

 

Her husband filed for divorced and seemed uninterested in working it out.

 

If my wife chose to murder my child, divorce is the least of what 'should' be done. But still my love for her would probably lead me to a lot of similar sympathy and patience similar to this person. It's sad that the law does nothing to protect the child in this case.

Also, It Is ABSOLUTELY NOT HER BODY HER CHOICE. It's the body of the unborn child! He was right to be supportive in the way he was except were it came to the choice of killing his unborn child. He should have said more about how wrong and disgusting it is so that she doesn't fool herself into thinking what she is doing is at all, in anyway acceptable and okay. She deserves only the full truth of her actions to bear down on her the entirety of the rest of her days. At least that.

 

True. It’s invasive and requires a lot of recovery time, and it’s expensive. I don’t even know if health insurance will pay for an elective surgery like getting tubes tied.

 

I know two women who had abortions because they were trying to get out of domestic violence, so I don’t think the man’s consent should be involved. If he’s violent or a rapist or abusive in anyway, he should absolutely not get to control a woman, the rest of her life, because he got her pregnant. In the state of Ohio, a man can try to stop you from even arranging an adoption and it doesn’t matter if he is violent, abusive, or accused of raping you.

 

If the husband got his way, like he should have, everything would’ve been the way it should be.

 

2+ month and it is an unborn person whatever name you want to give it to invalidate it's right to life. What's more was that it was his child. This was dreadfully appalling and indefensible.

 

Divorcing, giving your ex your baby, and then trying to live your life like nothing happened is a really complex situation and I don’t even think it’s reasonable. Many divorced people have kids. It’s not a simple arrangement.

 

It’s not possible at this point, but it may become possible in the future.

 

When I married my husband, we discussed these issues because I have some very serious medical issues if I were to become pregnant, and we discussed the possibility of having to terminate a pregnancy. My husband said it’s not our choice, it’s not his choice, it’s my choice, and that he will support me in making any decision I want because it’s my body, my health, and my life. When he told me that, I felt so grateful that he was my husband. If it’s in a woman’s body, it is ultimately her choice.

 

I would never refer to my children as my property

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
No, it isn't...abusive men want their victim to have kids to use as an anchor to keep her with him..

Your misogynistic attitude toward women is noted.....

 

Your misogynistic attitude toward women is noted...and makes your "arguments" null and void

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Women don't need to use their body to please men.


LOL, I love how when WOMEN do what they want it's "domineering""...

If the husband got HIS way would it be "domineering????

WHAT!?

Things would be as they should be if the MAN gets HIS way ???!!!!!

I sure hope that was sarcasm...

 

It was sarcasm, but I was trying to explain the OP is logic.

 

Yes....so?

 

I know it sounds weird, but they ARE regarded as the property of their parents.

CHILDREN AS PROPERTY
https://www.transformativeparent.co...lly regarded, legally,and how they should act.
Children are generally regarded, legally and morally, as the property of their parents. It is considered normal for adults, and especially parents, to dictate to children what they should believe, what they should want, and how they should act. As children develop into adults, they have little experience with actual compassion, and it is no wonder so few become compassionate adults.

 

I don’t dictate what to believe to my kids. I encourage them to be individuals and have healthy boundaries.

 

So I can do something just because someone else has? Monkeys see monkeys do… pathetic attitude of life

 

he did not honor his marriage vows he swore to god he would then either did he

 

yes, we were all a sperm and egg cell once too if you go back far enough, your point?

that means masturbation is killing millions of potential children

every period is one more child killed... so sad

 

How you raise your kids is up to you, but most parents pass their beliefs to their kids, and when they become adults they are free to go their own way.