Deputies: Hundreds of teens storm Ocoee theater

The media always gets things wrong to begin with since they report rumors to start out with and it is a competitive market. It is later that you get better information. One thing is certain, in instances like this, if they do not report on race like they did with the Zimmerman case, it is almost always certainly to involve black involvement. They too are afraid of being attacked by the black grievance industry.

 

Yea right, watch any local newscast and when it comes to the crime stories they will plaster a black face on the screen in a heartbeat. The way you can tell that someone white committed the crime is because you hardly ever see their face.

 

I can guarantee you these were mostly Black teens. Notice how they don't mention race.


Hundreds of "teens" attack pedestrians in Chicago



http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...cent-mile?lite

By Alexandria Fisher, NBCChicago.com

Several teens were arrested after dozens of mob groups began attacking pedestrians on Chicago’s downtown Magnificent Mile area on Saturday night.

Police responded to reports of disturbances near Michigan and Chicago Avenues.

Police said 28 teens were arrested during the incident and no serious injuries were reported.

The teens charged with misdemeanor reckless conduct and battery and later released, according to News Affairs Officer Perkus.

Eleven other teens were charged with the same misdemeanor charges after they attacked a group of women on the CTA Red Line, police said.


once again we see "teens" who other times have been described as "youths" out causing trouble and displaying "mob behavior" according to one community organizer.

This problem appears to be more serious to the nation than any legally owned gun and perhaps Obama should address this ever growing "teen" problem within the nation

 

I've missed a couple of pages.......so are the 'progressives' still pretending that these were NASCAR watching, Confederate flag waving White kids?..........LMAO at these people who can't seem to grasp reality.

 

Should race be a factor in how the media reports crime?

By Kyle Rogers, Originally published on Examiner.com

Ever notice that the media is pushing a political agenda? Certain minor events are reported endlessly while some major events are ignored. It all depends on the political agenda of the news outlet. It is no secret that the agenda is usually a left-wing one.

This agenda is especially pronounced when it comes to crime. The media does not like to report black crime. Even when an at large suspect posed an immediate danger to the public, the media would rather ignore it.

I’ve written about this issue for years online. I got a big break in 2007. The LA Times issued an official online statement admitting that it was standard practice in the newspaper industry to censor of the race of minority crime perpetrators.

In the past year, a multitude of media bosses have publicly confessed to censoring black crime. Some of them proudly confess, and say that the censorship is for the public’s benefit. Some of them even call critics “racists” for asking for accurate news coverage.

All of these “media elites” place political correctness far above public safety. For the past year, I’ve been collecting news articles on the subject. Here are my complete findings.

The TV Show COPS

John Langley, creator and producer of the TV show COPS bragged to conservative columnist Ben Shapiro that he censors black crime.

Langley states “What irritates me sometime is critics still watch something and say ‘oh look they misrepresent people of color.’ That’s absolutely not true. Au contraire. I show more white people than statistically what the truth is in terms of street crime. If you look at the prisons it’s 60-something percent people of color, and 30-something percent of white people. If you look at COPS it’s 60 percent white and 40 percent, it’s just the reverse. And I do that intentionally, because I don’t want to contribute to negative stereotypes.”

Langley boldly admits to censoring black crime for political reasons.

Associated Press

Tom Kent, deputy managing editor for standards and production at The Associated Press recently admitted that the AP censors black crime.

Last March Kent said that race is not usually mentioned unless it is a “hate crime.” As you know, the media rarely declares black on white crime to be a “hate crime.” Only the extremely rare white on black crimes are ever considered a “hate crime” in the media.

Kent said that if the police are looking for an at large suspect they may mention race. However, Kent stated “but once a person is captured, it probably would not be germane to the story.”

In other words, unless the perp is white or the police specifically ask for it, the AP censors the race of black crime perpetrators.

New York Times

Philip Corbett, associate managing editor of the New York Times recently confessed to censoring black crime.

Last March, 18 black males aged 16-27 were arrested for allegedly gang raping an 11 year old Mexican girl in Cleveland, Texas. The radical New Black Panther Party actually held a rally at an all black church demanding the release of the perpetrators. Over one hundred local blacks attended the rally.

The New York Times ran an article that critics say blamed the victim and her family. It also expressed shock that members of the public were supported the accused perps.

However the Times completely censored the fact that the perpetrators are black. The newspapers also portrayed those who were supporting the perps as “Texans.”

There was a backlash against the New York Times for their insulting coverage.

The New York Times published a follow-up admitting their first piece “lacked balance.”

Philip Corbett, however, defending censoring the race of the perpetrators. He said that mentioning the race of a crime perpetrator does “not really providing any useful information and it could be sort of boiler plate.”

By “boiler plate,” Corbett means that it would be politically incorrect to inform the public the truth about crime in America. He feels that political correctness is more important than public safety.

Chicago Tribune

Last June Chicago Tribune senior vice president and editor Gerould Kern admitted the newspaper censors black crime in a rather nasty response to his critics.

Kern stated, “we guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion because of the color of their skin.”

His admission of guilt came after a series of brutal racially motivated mob attacks against white people in Chicago. The Chicago Tribune censored the race of the perpetrators and concealed the nature of the attacks.

When critics attacked the Tribune for their coverage, Kern proudly boasted of the papers’ censorship and personally insulted the white victims. He ranted, “there is no evidence to suggest that the victims were singled out because of their race.”

Following the diatribe by Chicago Tribune Editor Kern, Chicago Tribune opinion page writer Steve Chapman, who calls himself “a minority of one,” stated the same thing and defended the practice.

Chapman, who is on the far left, states “It’s the newspaper’s sound general policy not to mention race in a story, whether about crime or anything else.” Chapman then got very nasty in his diatribe defending censorship. He states that people who advocate accurate reporting of crime stories “fear or dislike blacks.”

Chapman also decided to take a jab at the innocent white victims of black mob violence in Chicago. He claimed the race of the perpetrators was not relevant. Then he said stated “what good would it do to trumpet the skin color of the thugs? So pedestrians on Michigan Avenue can run away when they see two or more African-Americans?”

Obviously Chapman would rather see more innocent white people attacked than report the news accurately.

Washington Post

In August of 2010 the Washington Post Ombudsman Andrew Alexander stated that the paper censored race. He said that Weekend News Editor Robert E. Pierre supported the censorship.

The Post came under criticism by readings for censoring black mob violence on the local metro system.

Alexander whined, “The Post should always be sensitive to overplaying stories, especially if race is involved.” Keep in mind that Alexander is talking about a story that the Post was criticized for downplaying, not overplaying.

Pierre attacked critics of the paper’s coverage as “racial insensitive.”

LA Times

The LA Times was the first newspaper I ever noticed openly admitting to racial censorship. This was back in 2007. The paper made an online database of homicides. They offered a sort of apology for including the races of the perpetrators. They stated that it was normally their policy to censor this information.

On June 6, 2007 the LA Times made this official statement. “Racial information was once routinely included in news stories about crimes, but in recent decades, newspapers and other media outlets stopped mentioning suspects’ or victims’ race or ethnicity because of public criticism. Newspapers came to embrace the idea that such information is irrelevant to the reporting of crimes, and may unfairly stigmatize racial groups.”

By “public criticism,” they are referring to bullying by radical racial groups like the NAACP.
Share this:

http://conservative-headlines.com/2014/08/should-race-in-how-the-media-reports-crime/

 

Any mention of race with these wildings? You will not find them.

 

seems to be a hard choice between the liberal political correctness which obscures the problem and the conservative racial sensitivities, pretty understandable considering America's touchy history with race.

But yeah personally doesn't matter to me if race is mentioned or not, the people that say it does can get off their self important high horse of "wow ur discriminating against blacks!!" or whites or Mexicans or whoever. I see it as an acceptable form of free speech.

 

Not sure what you mean, it appears that the problem is liberal racial sensitivity, not conservative. Calling it for what it is is just reality.

Here are the facts.

Black teen wildings or destructive and sometimes violent flash mobs are happening from coast to coast.

I do think that eventually, it will run it's popularity course. Probably a serious incident will take place that will make it less appealing.

 

yes this is correct

anyways basically what i mean is if immigrants come to America to be equal and free then their ethnic pride of thinking they're being discriminated just because one of their ethnicities was mentioned in a violent crime is terribly ironic. like said in my other post that sensitive point really hurts the ability for free speech here. a government or general public deciding over what is and isn't politically correct is a fast track to tyranny.

 

True, the PC movement is designed to quell free speech through intimidation. When it become law, then it truly becomes tyranny.

 

so a few kids were denied entry to the R rated movie and this was a protest of them being denied?

 

I saw some conservative site say 900 black but sense then have removed the word black, so thinking it was a of a mix of races of 900 children

.

 

Thinking it was mixed is just convenient to dismiss the problem nationwide.

 

http://www.teaparty.org/shots-fired-drug-busts-made-900-black-teens-storm-fl-mall-83996/

http:/According to WKMG’s report, a mob of nearly a thousand black kids flooded the mall and tried to storm the movie theater, with some 200 to 300 of them getting inside before the security gates were closed. -

See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/shots-fired...teaparty.org/shots-fired-drug-busts-made-900-black-teens-storm-fl-mall-83996/

 

proof?

 

Damn look what the cat drug in.

 

Did you do your homework?

 

teaparty.org is a media outlet? Go figure.

 

Yeah. But not for long.

 

While you guys sit in your igloos seeing who can be the most racist, I did what most interested locals might do, I asked. I pointed out this mall sits in an affluent portion of town and it turns out a couple of the doctors my wife works with had their kids present during the celebration. The story they tell does turn your head.

The mall on weekends, and particularly the shows, are regular fare for the area youth. It's not all white, all black, or all middle eastern, a mixture of All of The Above. The thing in common is a little cash and bored kids. A relatively large number of the kids need look no further for medical or legal help than their parents. The theater usually runs the blockbuster movies for the kids as their late night show and its a cheap date at a known location for your kids with no alcohol and no more drugs than they find at school.

Long weekend, no other sports or other distractions, a little larger than usual late night crowd, and what does the theater show for the Midnight Special? Of course, 50 Shades of Grey. Parents dropped you off? Sorry, R rated, we can't sell you a ticket. A few older kids have tickets, some try to buy spares. Ushers refuse to admit anyone ticket or not without ID or someone who looks 20 years older. Gates open, there is a rush, there is anger, there is opportunism, there is confusion. Soon there is police.

Much noise. Many angry words. Stupid acts? They are teenagers. Riot? Hardly. Looting? No. Robbery? Could have been, who would notice? Mouth off and get busted? They are teenagers. Grounded? For Life. Mall? Teenagers now banned without parents.

 

This was all over 50 Shades of Grey? or as I call it...

Socially acceptable softcore pornography targeted at women.

 

There is nothing particularly upscale about Ocoee. It sure isn't Windermere. In fact in borders on Pine Hills that has more shootings than anywhere in the Orlando area. Pine Hills is predominately black. Local new stations here in Orlando are showing cell phone video of the incident. All teens shown on video are black.

 

Isn't WKMG.

 

WKMG never mentioned race, just like I said before.

 

They didn't have to... They showed the video.