‘Died Suddenly’? More Than 1-in-4 Think Someone They Know Died From COVID-19 Vaccines

Because that was not what it was supposed to show

What I wanted to show was that MRNA tech has been around for decades. Plus what your conspiracy theorists won’t tell you is that vaccine development for COVID had two major boosts - the sequencing early on of the genome and the previous attempts to develop vaccines to both SARS 1 and MERS

 

Yes, I did. 3 times, and you still avoid answering the question? Where does it state "raw data" in the link?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html

You know, where it states, "About VAERS" and "How VAERS Works".

 

It does not use the specific term but it does use terminology clearly indicating that it is not verified. Are you actually contending it is not raw data? What proof have you that it is not?

 

Given the conspiracy theories not a coincidence at all. I wonder how many reports they got of people becoming magnetic?

 

You tell 'em.

We all know nobody died prior to the JAB, thus all deaths can be ascribed to it.

 

...'that I know of' can be applied to everything I said. I figured it would be assumed. Apparently not, so thanks for clarifying.

 

A good friend of mine died last week from Cardiac Arrest... he was 55 years old... Just saying

 

So fire causes burns, heat and smoke, so what data do you have to 'analyse' to determine that the fire caused the damage? The same goes for the covid injections, what data do you need to determine the cause of all the adverse effects and deaths caused by the jabs? It is in your face, screaming at you!
So yes, raw data is used to fill VAERS, but that data is what it is. Do you know of anyone who has any of the adverse effects described in the Pfizer document that hasn't had the covid injections?

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

 

What more needs to be said? MSNBC
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/msnbc

But of course, they would run with the commentary like they did. They're just puppets on a stick that leans heavily to the left.

 

A LOT
As I said I have discovered in the past it includes motor vehicle accidents - now they could have been from some adverse event related to the vaccine but more probably due to drunk driving. Thrombosis - could be a vaccine or it could be the person was pregnant and just flew 8 hours without taking precautions- and unless you wonder why pregnant? Pregnant women are “walking clots” and it is so for a reason

what happens is that they review the data. Follow up and find out what might also be happening that is a more likely explanation e.g reported sudden cardiac arrest - find out there is a family history of long qt syndrome and the person was just prescribed a medication that causes prolonged qt

 

The “stick” was not the point - the point was that this so called health professional successfully made herself look like a twit

 

Not at 16-30 yo! 45+, perhaps. Especially people who are fit and healthy in their prime. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to work it out.

 

Why has no other network been presented with the same accusations? As it's been identified, MSNBC is just one of the puppets on a stick network. Just cut and paste what narrative they want to convey
and not the whole context of the argument.

 

Google it! It was all over the media because it was hilariously wrong - mind you probably not on Faux “news”

 

No. I rarely Google anything.

Do you know what [PEG2000-DMG] is? I'm sure you'll know soon enough after you "Google" it.

 

Yes at ALL ages because there are things that take out young people and “Long Q-T syndrome is one of them. Sudden Cardiac Death Syndrome is another thing that has to be ruled out as also Brugada Syndrome etc

Mate I have had more years working in the high end of health care than you have possibly been alive and I can reel off issue after issue than can kill young people

 

Well, that explains the rabbit hole you appear to be sitting in lols!



Comfy down there?

Now if you ARE interested in science there is a thing called “Google scholar” that will show you all the science research papers for any given span of time

 

My God man, I have already shown that this report is not showing what you are claiming...and yet here you are with it again as if I didn't say anything.

 

The survey is completely moot. It is reflective of the pervasiveness of conspiracy theory, the power and comfort of ignorance, and the folly of putting your faith in social media "doctors". Nothing else.

 

From that very page (if you had bothered to read it)

The information collected by VAERS can quickly provide an early warning of a potential safety problem with a vaccine.

VAERS is not something that tells you if there is a problem, it tells you there is a POTENTIAL problem and that the issue should be investigated or, as was part of the other report you keep linking to it will identify an AESI (Adverse Event of Special Interest). Again an AESI is not necessarily a problem with the vaccine but something, by its nature, indicates there needs to be more study.

 

How can there be a potential problem if the research 10 years into the future so how magically and determine their words any problems that was three visit potential for something that can't be?

 

Why is everything that doesn't adhere to the narrative a conspiracy theory? It's almost like everything you disagree with is conspiracy theory.

Like calling things you don't like conspiracy theories is a defense mechanism.

 

For some folks it's a built in contrivance that helps to demobilize the fact that they may have to admit to something that showcases and highlights their ignorance or a mistake.

I See it all the time.

 

I see it all the time too. You're one of them.

 

Neither do you know of a single person in the federal government who has broken the law.