“(white replacement) has been planned for a while”

Why yes, yes they were, like I said.

 

Your corporate state has no allegience to any nation, and why would anyone apologize for things they still yet engage in?

 

Yeah, we know we never meant any of that.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Island-Tiki-...=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B01K89A034

 

It’s funny but I actually agree with you on this. We may have slightly different ideas on what that corporate state is though.

 

They meant what they said. The problem is their intentions have been changed through historical revisionism. This was done for political purposes.

 

I guess that "all men" was the hint it only applied to white people because so many of the founders were the original white supremacists.

Sad to see that today's supremacists are but a pale shadow of the intellectual and moral giants that their antecedents who once represented the best and brightest that america had to offer. IN fact, they now represent the worst and dumbest. Quite the fall from "grace".

 

And that is not part of the Constitution. It's an Act passed after the Constitution was ratified - acts can be overturned without the majorities required for changes to the Constitution.

Want to try again? You're batting a big "0" so far.

 

Pretty much every generation of Americans up to and including the greatest generation opposed the current state of the country. They never wanted this. Name a great American in history and they clearly didn’t want this. That’s why it’s funny when globalists claim they best represent what America is all about.

No, your ideology would have been right at home in 1920s Weimar Germany, not America. Your ideology never originated here.

 

Yup, only affluent land holding white males got the vote. They engaged in ethnic cleansing/genocide, enslavement; and all of it was based upon race and supported by their so called religion. There's been no revisionism required in matters such as; the "war on drugs" which was a war on the impoverished and the darker in hue, in the mass incarceration of black and brown folk, in corporate for profit prisons with convict labor leasing which is a return to slavery, or in the ability of the corporate state police to murder unarmed black folk in the streets with impunity.

I agree, it is all very american.

 

Article 1 section 8 clause 4

 

Your ideology came here from somewhere else and murdered it's way onto here, we know.

 

and it was then changed, through the legislative process. Which is part of our democratic process.

Another brewsky thread blown to bits, lol

 

The Naturilizarion act of 1790 was done to clarify the ambiguity of immigration law in the Constitution. We can see what George Washington, James Madison, and pretty much every other Founder had in mind for the country. It was pretty far from the cosmopolitan “citizen of the world” perspective that people like you believe in and try and revise history to show.

Your America began 50 years ago. That’s as far back as you go in representing America.

 

Let’s see a quote.

 

Yeah, we all know what they had in mind;

Apartheid

 

You can't find it? Jeebus mang.

 

Which group do you represent that has never colonized anything?

 

i see you've finally ascended to the final level of political discourse



anyway, if someone forcefed you antipsychotics you would stop being a nazi

 

And again - not part of the Constitution. Just an interpretation reflecting the times. Times change. You think if Jefferson were alive to day he would be for miscegenation laws given his obvious attraction to women outside his race? Hardly.

 

I don’t see anything that says it’s a “individual right” to have non-white 3rd world immigration. Rahl always fails to support his arguments, but maybe you won’t? Let’s see you try.

 

Article I, Section 8, clause 4 of the Constitution entrusts the federal legislative branch with the power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” ... But control over naturalization does not necessarily require full control over immigration.

 

Wrong. That was part of the Constitution. They codified what the Constitution was actually saying so that people like you couldn’t misinterpret what they had in mind.

And no, I don’t think Jefferson would have wanted the US to not have a white majority.

 

congress made it a right, lol. I never fail to support my arguments.
<Rule 5>

 

So you support Government imposing change through non-democratic means, as a supporter of democracy?