“HYPOCRISY”: 10-Year Old GOES OFF, Unleashes On School’s Mask Mandate

Stop pretending anybody cares about these old pictures. Stop pretending posting the same old crap that nobody cares about over and over and over is normal

 

Republicans are excited about this child sharing a conservative opinion that is stupid if they make them wear it outdoors.

Democrats are targeting another child cause only they can be the one to abuse kids for their political rhetoric.

I disagree with all of you. That's right. You're all wrong. They should have to wear masks unless they're outside, or exercising in gym class. Trump did a stellar job with the vaccine, and were almost at the finish line. I talk to Democrats that are actual human and not the slime that are totally oblivious to their culpability in supporting massive corruption and violence and condemning it whenever it serves their purpose. The kid was wrong to behave in this manner. He's a piece of **** like Greta Thunberg, but we elected Trump cause he behaves exactly like liberals. Except he can actually back it up with vaccine before Democrats can even decide on a time table as to how long they're going to prolong a project so their donors maximize government subsidies. I'm excited to have cleared out Bush, Romney, and Liz Cheney for some new blood.

We haven't sunk so low as to dox children. Democrats are really sick people.

 

What did he say that is political? I blame you.

 

Indeed, but he IS old enough to understand that he doesn't like wearing a mask. He's also more than old enough to recognize hypocrisy - even if the word wasn't in his vocabulary. Face it, what he said was just true, no politics.

The mask issue made idiots of all authoritarian lefty's - f them all (this is me interjecting politics - the kid made no such observation).

 

She has the “correct” message. I remember being opinionated on political matters at his age. The thing is that his message was very personal based on his real life experiences and feelings. It only seemed political to those who didn’t like the content of his expression of his own experiences and feelings.

 

Wuhan looses the pandemic.
Left attacks America through undemocratic lockdowns.
Left destroys youth through lockdowns.

"THE LOCKDOWN CURE WAS ALWAYS WORSE THAN THE WUHAN DISEASE": Children’s Hospital Colorado declares ‘state of emergency’ for pediatric mental health.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/452275/

Now the most vicious attack on the American Economy, idling workers through direct payments. No workers equals lines, shortages and rationing, the 3 calling cards of marxism.

 

Is not the gist of the meaning
you are expressing here, not "democrats are the enemy?"

Is your divisive rhetoric indicative, then, of your being a democrat?

 

There is a thread, right now, calling Mayor Lori Lightfoot a racist for wanting to give priority to the few journalists of color among Chicago's City Hall press pool, for her 1-on-1 interviews, intended for the constituents of her majority black & Latino city, so they can see their city government, for a change, through the lens of a fellow person of color.

There have been more threads than I could count, calling Biden a racist.

Black Lives Matter is, according to a large group of non-Dems, is a racist movement.

Vice-President Kamala Harris has been called a racist, by the Right.

The 1619 Project, and its creator, Nikole Hannah-Jones, are routinely referred to as racist, when they are are discussed.

Former President Obama is regularly slammed as being racist, which began back while he was still in office, i.e., before Trump entered the picture and all the Dems, supposedly, lost it, and began throwing around the "racist," accusation.


I would also like to point out, as something I could no doubt make a running theme in my responses to Moolk, that he ends this post by pinning ALL the spurious charges of racism on DEMOCRATS which, if that isn't, "divisive rhetoric," I don't know what is, despite my just having replied to a different one of Moolk's posts that-- you guessed it-- wholely blamed Dems for all the divisive rhetoric.

And note there are zero sources cited, or even examples given for this individual opinion because, remember, it is a load of malarkey.

 

Everything I have said is objectively correct. Your refusal to do your own research is not my fault. And it’s true that Biden and Kamala are racist, and racist max is as well. Prioritizing journalists based on color is racist. Obama was as well, he loved stoking division based on race. Racism, and division are completely an issue on the left. If they didn’t attempt to make race an issue in everything it’s not involved in they wouldn’t have arguments to make on substance.

and blm is a genuine terrorist group, and yes they are racist.

you are allowed to be wrong and disagree if you want though.

 

I am pointing out the reality, if that reality is divisive in your opinion then that is an issue with you not me.

 

Totally.

Masks = Marxism.

Che Guevera tattoos are going to be mandatory in pre-school before September, and Chinese will be the official language of the USA by year's end.

Bank it.

 

Ahh yes your standard misrepresentation, and response lacking of substance.

par for the course on the left.

 

So your argument is that whenever Republicans cry, "Racist!" it is, "objectively correct," but every time Democrats do, it is only to stoke division, or gain them partisan advantage, and never contains a grain of truth, because no Republican carries even a grain of racism, within them...Yeah, that doesn't seem too incredible to be true.

And thank you, by the way, for allowing me to be wrong and disagree with you.

As stunningly convincing as your argument was, however, my response, you shall discover, does yours one better; for, you see,
everything I said in my post was both objectively correct AND VERIFIABLE; in fact, even though your refusal to do your own research is not my fault, there is no need for research, because you confirmed my claims of Republicans bashing their adversaries with the verbal cudgel of, "Racist," (see your reply, above).

It is not insignificant that the central thesis that you were trying to prove, in your post that charged Democrats to be the wielders of this cudgel, was that using this term was the source of all of our country's division.


Lastly I'll point out that, of all these, "objectively correct," charges you allege, somehow, not a single one has ever been proven true in any court of law. So what you are calling objectively correct, is nothing more than your opinion-- proving only that you incorrectly understand the word, "objectively."

 

My claim is that those people I previously mentioned are demonstrably racist.

and that dems bring race into issues where race isn’t an issue and do so relentlessly, which ironically is racist.

it is your job to do your own research. Had you done so, you would see everything I said was in fact verifiable whole everything you are claiming is simply incorrect overly emotional opinion.

the source of our division is certainly dems. I remember the “ he will not divide us” chant that was then used by dems to divide us lol. And a court of law wouldn’t decide who’s racist, that’s an irrational burden of proof lmao.

 

Give the bull-plop a rest. Everything I claimed-- that Repubs charged all those people with racism-- was confirmed BY YOU! So how can you claim it is an, "incorrect, overly emotional opinion?" Oh yeah, by lying your ass off:

Your overt hypocrisy, which is almost too fancy a word for your blatantly contradicting yourself, is tiresome. You have simply demonstrated, yet again, your zero credibility. This level of, "argument," was beneath me, two-score and seven years ago, & it's certainly not worth my attention, now. So save it for the fools who would waste their time, reading your disingenuous babble.

 

A little bit late, now that many are vaccinated and the infection rate is falling.
He must have strange parents who also believe that Trump won the election, LOL

 

Listening to him actually a step up for the his cult after listening to trump’s tantrums that sounded like a 3 year old with Tourette’s syndrome.

 

The kid is fine. Hopefully, his parents also teach him about real injustices in the world.

 

Do you mean they're anti-white? I don't think so. BLMs are not a racial hate group, just bored people who love violence. They're a contemporary version of the Hooligans.

 

Hmmm...3M is a marxist company. Kimberly-Clark, too. What is the world coming to?

 

They most certainly do hate whites. Their supporters have been very open about that. The racial nonsense from the fake narrative of white privilege, to blatant calling for special privileges, to openly assaulting and calling for the deaths of white people.

 

Nothing I have said Is bull plop. It is genuinely objectively correct. Republicans have charged racists with a demonstrable past of racism, as being racist. I am not lying, your inability to see the truth or do your own research on the topic at hand is not my fault.

norhing about anything I have said could lead a rational person to the conclusion I am being hypocritical. In fact, it’s dem hypocrisy that has been so astounding these last few years. And at no point have I contradicted myself at all. If you wish to flee a discussion in an overly emotional manner then by all means do so.

I remain objectively correct on all accounts regardless if you stay or go.

 

In a white-dominated society, other races have a much more difficult life. That's unfortunately a fact, bro. If you're white yourself, you can hardly tell.

 

That’s not true. Facts don’t support that nonsense at all. It’s simply the racist trying to justify thier racism. It’s literally easier to be black and get into a school, or a job, based on equal or less qualifications than it is to be white. There is more evidence, in writing and policy, of black privilege.

but that, “it’s true you just can’t see it cuz your white” argument is the same fallacious argument used since the beginning. There is no solid fact, data driven narrative around white privilege that doesn’t fall apart once analyzing all the data. Sure there is data that if viewed in a vacuum that might lead one to believe it, which is what makes it such a convincing lie. But view it all, and it falls apart.

 

White dominated society? How many of the hundreds upon hundreds of black only organizations should I list here or policies made exclusively for blacks?
Compared to how many white only organizations I could list which would equal zero.
If I decide to live in Mexico would you claim they have Mexican privilege?
The only racist left in the US are the people using racism to stoke fear or divide this nation. Give me one place on earth where the black race has it better than America.