13% Of The Population Causing Over Half The Violent Crime

So if you had more black friends, where are they now?

 

Deportation to Africa? I agree with SiliconMagician conceptually. A large number of blacks have a genetic past in the USA deeper than mine (~1900).

Name calling? Typical for those without an answer

My answer, and yes I am also a racist. Formal segregation. The southeast USA is already primarily black and the southwest is already primarily hispanic. Break the country into at least three BEFORE a nasty situation like Yugoslavia in the mid 1990's. We have pre-emptive wars in the middle east fighting "terrorism", why not pre-emptive secession? It is rather expensive housing the prison population in the USA. I'm all for drug legalization to reduce the incarceration rate, however, there is no excuse for violent crime. The death penalty must be used more often to cut costs.

 

1. How would this formal segregation be implemented?

2. Who's gonna go along with it?

3. What happens if people like myself say no?

 

1. How would this formal segregation be implemented?
Use existing demographics (as I stated) to reduce the logistical costs and give a time frame (2 years is reasonable).

2. Who's gonna go along with it?
I would. I'm giving some thought of moving to Maine soon.

3. What happens if people like myself say no?
That is also fine. That is between you and your neighbors. On a fixed date (let's say 2 years from today), ALL government aid will end. That means no more public housing, no more welfare, no more food stamps, no more rent subsidies, no more energy subsidies, no more ethanol subsidies, no more prisons (violent criminals will be executed). If history is any indication of the future, there will be a significant population reduction after this event. The formation of the three countries is an initial peaceful "safe-haven" courtesy (i.e. a pre-emptive secession if you trust your own race more than you trust other races).

This answers everything sociologically. Yugoslavia has horribly violent in the 1990's and that country was primarily "white" (although there were religious and ethnic divisions). Most of Africa is horribly violent and most of those countries are primarily "black". Much of South America is horribly violent and those countries are primarily "hispanic". We'll see how the new countries work out for 50-100 years and then entertain the idea of multiculturalism again in the USA.

 

I have no doubt that if this idea went through it would solve absolutely zero problems and be a colossal waste of time and a colossal lack of support from any major party, and not just political ones.

BTW Africa is pretty violent because of tribal differences, not racial ones. Certain South American nations is violent because of drug wars and constant rebel groups i.e. FARC.

 

"I have no doubt that if this idea went through it would solve absolutely zero problems and be a colossal waste of time and a colossal lack of support from any major party, and not just political ones." micfranklin

If the USA is skillful enough to avoid economic collapse, you are correct. If not, and my money is on the NOT, my recommendations will have saved literally millions of lives. There will be hateful pundits from all sides blaming the most visible targets, race and religion. My statements about the elimination of government programs will occur by default and all of the races and religions will be intertwined in a complex manner with no escape. Yugoslavia all over again. What happened there? Segregation with the formation of several new countries after one of the bloodiest wars in recent history.

 

So basically.... Kill off everyone you don't like, and then kill off all the poor people as well, and all their assistance? What problems do you expect to be solved by that?

 

Also formal segregation is a bad idea, considering if you re-implemented that, there would be race riots from South Carolina to Los Angeles to Honolulu and all the way back to NYC.

 

"So basically.... Kill off everyone you don't like, and then kill off all the poor people as well, and all their assistance? What problems do you expect to be solved by that?" Wilder

Where, exactly, did I ever advocate violence? I am advocating separation to avoid violence. Should I use a poetic license and fill in that you fully support government sponsored theft (i.e. assistance to the poor)?

 

The funny thing about Yugoslavia and segregation is that even now after its broken up into several states, there's still plenty of Serbs mixing with Croats, Bosnians mixing with Serbs and so on. So even if your plan went into action, I'm pretty sure it would yield the same result.

 

The only time we see race riots (as we saw in the sixties was when you mix the races together). Segregation prevents race riots and prevents racism from showing its ugly face. This is just common sense.

 

Which is exactly why you, Zook and several others show so much of it here on your own free will

 

What are you saying here? That we're all creating racial tension by favoring segregating the different races?

 

That's you types answer to everything you don't like. Loot and riot.

Now you see why we want to get away from you "people?"

Dudeman makes some good points, but I only see one problem in society today and that's blacks... and possibly Muslims and Jews. Other than that I think multi-culturalism works pretty well.

 

Ignore him. He's a black empty headed troll. Logic isn't in his repertoire.

 

Just the fact that you talk about segregation preventing racism and yet you, Zook and several others contribute the most of it to this site without it even being segregated.

 

Such a terrific and intellectual answer. I disagree with you on everything and logically tell you why you're wrong, therefore I am empty-headed By the way did you ever answer my question about those black friends you used to have?

 

How exactly do I contribute to racism by my suggesting we segregate to prevent racism from ever getting started?

 

Just about every single post you've made in this entire forum is contributing, and this segregation by race and race alone to prevent racism defeats its own purpose. Don't forget those couple of threads you started about David Duke not being a racist, when everything he's done suggests otherwise. And just so you know, you can't prevent racism from ever getting started because it's been around since time began.

 

A misleading title to find yet another racist thread at PF.

Never mind the black crime rate dropped by half in the past 20 years.

 

I used to think we no longer needed affirmative action in this country, because we had gotten past the racism of our history.

Seeing the racist bigots like Zook that frequent boards like this one where they can spew their hate and evil bigotry under the cloak of anonymity has educated me to the fact that we will need things like affirmative action in this country for many years to come.

 

More racists come out.

That's one thing good about these boards.

It allows us to see what some people really think when they can express views with anonymity things they would never say in public around normal folks.

Anyone who things racism doesn't exist in this country needs to read threads like this one.

 

Our racist, bigoted members demonstrate their skill at insults and name calling.

 

What does any of your drivel have to do with being vigilant around a group of people (blacks) that have the highest criminal content among the various races, and of being vigilant because of having my having experienced black on white crime in the past?

 

Its not manly to be racist and bigoted, neither is it unmanly to not be so. Youve been taught wrong boy.