http://patriotsquestion911.com/medical.html Above are examples of people that include Veterans for 9/11 Truth, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and on and on. How is that all of these people are 'kooks' (to use the words of the protectors of the story here)? Never have I seen a small group of people fight so diligently (here) to continually trash, ridicule, and otherwise try to manhandle so many others that simply want the truth told. If the truth was exactly as told, why would people be so fearful of it? Why are they so against confirming (what is supposed to be) what we all are supposed to already know?
has anyone ever heard of the TORONTO Hearings? This should have made major NEWS, however the bias created by the Propaganda Machine has people dismissing the evidence before actually looking at it and understanding the weight of it. There is overwhelming evidence that shows the official story to be a crock! and the major weapon that the official story supporting faction wields is the labeling of "truthers" as nut cases. very sad really.
Ownership of a second level domain name does not magically turn the name-holder into a "professional". If you believe that $5 and a Go Daddy account somehow makes a person fit to fly an airliner or perform surgery on you, you're welcome to prove that point to us all! Even if someone is a bona fide professional in one area or another, how does that make their political beliefs more correct than anyone else's?
OK, I have an idea, how about "JoeNobodyfor911truth" All the mass of individuals who have no super-duper claim to fame such as having earned a PHD or become a military officer, or for that matter anything at all, there are millions of people, many of whom harbor the deep inside certain knowledge that the events of 9/11/2001 were not as described by the mainstream media, however they do not say anything at all because they do not want to be labeled a "truther" nut case.
Well then: when will this mass of professionals an joenobodies get something done? Where is their investigation? Are they really just cowering in the dark, afraid to be called names? Is your entire movement made up of yellow, gutless crybabies?
First of all it should be noted that holding deep beliefs in things that only you can see does fall within the realm of mental illness. So does the obsession part of it. It's a matter that's best kept between yourself and your physician. So please, tell it to your doctor! This is not the place to go for help like that.
You keep accusing everyone of "accepting the story"....the reason we acknowledge what happened that day is, there is no credible evidence to the contrary. You claim every video taken that day, every photo taken that day was faked... every eyewitness who saw the plane, was a fake. The you carry the burden of proof to prove those claims. You can't. You lose even before you started.
Boy, ain't that the truth! The spell of arguing from incredulity. I can't believe it so it must not be true. http://patriotsquestion911.com/Photos/Carol Wolman 220 JPG80.jpg
No, I'm not. You are, and you know perfectly well what I'm saying, and you just do not want to hear it. End of story.
isn't this an argument from Authority bit rather than get the evidence to stand on its own, you have to invoke an authority figure so as to support what would otherwise be unsupported.
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). How is it possible one video is faked and the others show the same thing are not? You don't even understand the folly of your claim.
Fact is, ALL of the "FLT175" videos are FAKE, and the magnitude of the conspiracy is too big for most people to recognize the fact that it could be real at all, this is the essence of the BIG LIE. The logic is there, the video of "FLT175" penetrating the south wall of the south tower is, if taken at face value, a violation of the laws of nature.
I don't think you understand the 'folly' of my claims either. Basically, you're surmising that because YOU couldn't possibly conceive of such a dastardly thing being instituted, and because you can't possibly envision such a deed being done, you therefore dismiss anything that even approaches any hint of disagreement with what's supposed to be 'the real story' (according to you and whomever else that believes it). If you can't have if perfectly 'lined up' as to how it had to have happened, then you reject it. Again, you accept the 'official' version of events, and I reject it.
