4 Dead, Including Suspect After Shooting At Jacksonville Dollar General

I don't think so. Since Josh Sugarmann released his dishonest circular suggesting the press use the term "assault weapon" to depict machine guns in the movies, we have seen this constantly from the anti gun left

 

Most intelligent people who read the story actually put two and two together, so I guess you’ll just be the one who will never know. Or care.

 

And?

 

Maybe because this shooter is the entire ****ing topic of the thread, if you haven’t noticed….

 

And it shows the left is more about agenda than reality.

 

Do you think some videos of the knock out game in action would draw much attention from the left?

 

So you think a white guy shooting black people put it there because he is a Buddhist? How often do non-racists use Nazi symbols to decorate the weapons they shoot non-whites with?

This post and the 'likes' it recieved are great examples of the willful denial of reality on the part of some conservatives.

 

No and it has nothing to do with this thread, so dont bother wasting our time.

 

When did Zelensky display a swastika. A very specific claim, Should be easy to defend.

Of course its a subject change, as is dragging in Ukraine. Why are you so keen to change the subject? Why are you so keen to claim a guy who painted swastikas on the gun he used to kill non-whites isn't a racist?

 

Yes, and even then someone will construct the response to that as being an attack on white people.

 

wrong on both counts. you will never truly know. You can come to a conclusion and you can pretend it is the right one-and it might be. but you are correct one count. I really don't care. the mope is dead. I care about things I can control or affect me.

 

Look, I just saw a story where this guy’s racist writings were cited but those writings weren’t published. If there is a hell, then I hope this guy rots in it like every other murderer.

Now back to the swastika. Just having that symbol is not by itself proof of these murders being race related. If the guy had rosary beads on him would you say it was a religious murder? How about a towel wrapped around his head or maybe a blm membership card, would that point to anything?

 

This is hysterical. When it comes to Biden the left can’t add two and two together even if they used a super computer.

And yes, with the thousands of Trump whataboutisms thrown at us by the left, it feels good to get one of my own in.

 

That’s great but nothing you’ve said correlates to you having anything resembling a point, bro

 

The racial slur(in bold) was unnecessary.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs

 

Good for you, sport. But I’m still gonna call it like I see it and until proven otherwise, I’m correct in my earlier assumptions.

 

no you aren't necessarily correct. at best you can say that the known evidence strongly suggests that the motive for the shooting was a racist bias. And I agree that is what the preponderance of the evidence suggests. But to say that is absolutely the reason is premature and appears to be based more on a political agenda than understanding the concept of proof

 

I would like to see the crazies go away too and would like to see ar-15's be harder to get

 

And yet, you still defend the man time and time again despite what you say. I am not saying your blindly support the guy, but you are supporting what he says and that too is the problem here.

 

I love the hatred towards AR 15s when they are rarely used in crime despite being the most popular rifle in the USA. I pretty much flush in the toilet any argument that whines about this rifle because fists kill more people each year than AR 15s. There were no documented cases of ARs being used in mass shootings the first 40 years they were on the market-leftwing gun banners started broadcasting to crazies that AR rifles are what crazies ought to use.

 

But you do know that Rush Limbaugh had access to firearms and owned firearms when he was a drug addict to oxycodine. And yet, Republicans and conservatives say, when Rush was alive, stated that it was okay.

 

So you're looking at an amendment?

 

I honestly do not recall anyone talking about guns and Rush. I don't recall him stating much-if anything about owning guns. The real issue is that many on the left are far more interested in disarming honest gun owners than they are about punishing violent felons

 

Not even the FBI stats show that. Fatback is getting that informaiton from some conservative moron, like Dan Bongino or someone similar.

 

I am realistic, as long as owning a gun is a right, it's a right, not a privilege that can be revoked - many on the left and right disagree with me on that