4 Witnesses Have Changed Their Stories in the Zimmerman Case.

I'm sure you would prefer that he be dragged out into the street and hung by a lamp post, but we do still have laws in this country.
Not the least of which is that he is entitled to defend himself. Either by some thug attacking him or from questionable persecution. (Sorry, I meant prosecution.)

That's the way the cookie crumbles.

 

Zimmermann is gonna walk, and rightly so.

 

That's not gonna happen because the Mayans said the world was going to end in Nov. of 2012. So brace yourself. And learn to swim.

 

You mean like when you were spreading this picture around claiming it was fact???

 

What do you think it means when the police tell you "We don't need you to do that?" AND when they instruct you to meet the officers at the mailbox?

What do you think the operator would have said if Zimmerman had told him he had a gun on him?

 

????LOLOL!!! Which words confuse you? It maens "OK. We don't need you to do that". Not even that they dont want him to do that and not even close to instructions not to do that. They asked if he was following, he replioed yes and they respond "OK. We don't need you to do that". He probably wasnt doing it for the needs of the police and instead the needs of potential victims of burglaries.

"instruct". A question isnt an instruction either. The police said, "OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then?"
You people only demonstrate the weakness of your arguments by resorting to such tortured interpretaions of plain, simple words with very clear meanings.

 

Who was that other guy in the picture?
Are they sure it wasn't thugvon?

 

You are correct, dixon.

When the police dispacher said, "OK. We don't need you to do that", GZ said OK, turned around and began walking back to his SUV.

It was at this time he was confronted, attacked and assulted by Trayvon Martin.

This was a very foolish choice on the part of Trayvon Martin.

 

Yes yes he is . Wanna be cop will wish he never knew what a cop was after they get done with him .

 

Yep. These loons that believe that a jury can convict on murder 2 with this evidence(or lack thereof) must be hitting the bong a little too hard these days.

 

No.. he didn't... he following Trayon around the building and down into the grassy alley.

GZ was nowhere near his truck.

 

Doesn't matter. Thugvon told the Deester that he was by his Dads house, and he ended up pretty far from there didn't he? Or did he?

 

Yes he did stop. Listen to the 911 call. You can tell Zimmerman stopped.

 

This is a huge hole in Dee's story.

 

And also, that she alledgedly heard the boy she spent 6 hours with on the phone that day and heard he was so "scared" yet she never told the cops or his parents or anyone until approached by Trayvons Dad 3 weeks later.

 

That is odd. She had evidence and didn't come forward.

 

She did come forward.. Her parents called the SPD and offered to drive her 250 miles to Sanford to be interviewed.. The SPD declined.

 

Reguardless of what Margot says, the girl did not go to the cops or tell anyone, and Margot cant back it up, you just have to believe her blindly. But yeah, Crump said she missed the wake because she had to go to the hospital, but she never told anyone that Trayvon was scared, or feeling stalked his last minutes and was murdered, until Trayvons dad 3 weeks later saw he talked to this girl a lot his last day, and contacted her, probably wanting to know what they talked about, who knows?

 

I have read Dee refused to talk to the police until the Feds got involved. But that's not the only thing I find troubling about her. Take a second and think about her story. She said Martin asked Zimmerman "why you following me for?" and Zimmerman said "what are you doing here" and then the phone fell and she claims to have heard something like "get off". Think about that. Have you ever heard a fight start like that. Two complete strangers come up and start fighting after two sentences? And what about the loud talking the witnesses heard? Sorry, it just doesn't add up.

 

Prosecution has already admitted in the bond hearing that they have no evidence that Zimmerman was not returning to his truck. Where did you get evidence they dont have? Your fertile imagination?

 

I agree, but I do think in every lie there is truth, and I have no doubts Trayvon verbally spoke to George first. I also dont believe that the phone just went dead, that doesnt happen anymore, until someone hangs up or presses a button the line would still be open. I wonder if there is anyway it can be determinded if Trayvon closed out the call before the altercation, there has to be a way to tell.

 

Trayvon's father received the cell phone on March 2 from the SPD, but couldn't figure out his son's security code.. Meanwhile, the girl's parents called SPD who were not interested in interviewing her.
A couple of weeks later Crump got Trayvon's cell phone records.. also the girls cell record and took the infomration to Gov Rick Scott.

 

They never discussed the truck with GZ that night and didn't impound it.. The wife showed up the next day and just drove it off.

Evidently there was a disconnect between the 911 dispatch and the officers who arrived on the scene.

 

Why would they impound the truck? This isnt the Casey Anthony story where a trunk played a crucial role of any kind, so why would the truck be impounded? Seriously, I would love to hear the explanation of why Georges truck had to be taken.

 

Where was the truck parked??