5th grade teacher committed homosexual pedophilia with 13 little boys

My junior year Spanish teacher was a fairly young guy, couldn't have been older than 27 or 28, and got dinged for having inappropriate relations with a female student in my graduating class who I believe was 17 at the time, which is the age of consent in New York. He disappeared like Keyser effing Soze. They did not dick around with that one.

Certain school districts, be they in Democratic or Republican areas, are run by competent people who take care of nonsense like this, and some are run by knuckledragging morons who couldn't find their own buttholes with a road map.

 

More sexual assaults happen in public schools. Many more times over than what we have been told happens in the Catholic church. But hey, can't trash the schools, we need them right?

- - - Updated - - -

Harvey Milk was a pedophile and they adore him in CA

 

I would say polygamy for sure. Now that marriage is separated from procreation and is just an arrangement between two willing adults, I see no reason why polygamy cannot be included. As for pedophilia, a few Academia elites will have to come up with some sort of new research showing that children can consent at a younger age than previously thought. Then we'll start seeing movement from the left on the issue. In the past, I've guessed that we will see something major on that front within the next 20 years. We're already seeing them push for younger and younger sex education and access to contraception.

 

All quite likely. I've noticed in some of the posts from homosexual supporters (I refuse to use the word "gay"), that they talk about "gay youth". "Youth" ? Since when are "youth" supposed to be sexual in any way whatsoever ? Sex is something that is supposed to be reserved for adults.

 

Please prove that Harvey Milk was a pedophile and if not remove this lie.

- - - Updated - - -

We are sexual beings from the moment we are born.

 

This is the kind of statement we will see from progressives when trying to push for acceptance of pedophilia.

Isn't it sick that when a baby a born, a progressive in the room is thinking of it as a "sexual being" already?

 

Jack Galen McKinley was 17 years his younger....there making him 16.

 

This is the classic forum punt.

Brew has laid out a very tight idea and you're stumped.

 

Well, I guess that cinches it...the unbeatable anecdote of dubious provenance . Well done.

.

 

Two thing pedophilia is NOT:

1) An attraction to adolescent teens
2) Child molestation

The one thing pedophilia IS:

1) An attraction to pre-pubescent children.

Now then: There is NO evidence that Harvey Milk was a pedophile. He did apparently like younger men. Certainly we can express valid criticism of his personal conduct - he was no saint. But outright lying about Milk though is going to earn you a Rule 10 complaint. I don't want to go there, but if people persist with this BS, I will.

As for California's celebration of Milk's accomplishments (which are not a celebration of his personal life), that's a topic for another thread. The whole "Harvey Milk was a pedophile" chant is just a dog-whistle, and it has nothing to do with this thread. So stick to the actual topic, which I fully agree is a disgusting and deplorable situation, for which the officials connected to it should certainly be investigated and receive any due punishment.

 

Can't blame it on the Catholics, or any other Christian school(s), so it "doesn't count".

 

Here we go with the Gay Lobby Designed, APA "redefitnition" BULLCRAP.

Here, in the Real World, "pedophilia" IS CHILD MOLESTATION, your silly attempts to redefine it, notwithstanding.

A dictionary ,which has NO POLITICAL AGENDA, (unlike the APA, and the above poster), defines "pedophilia" thusly:



pe·do·phil·ia

noun \ˌpe-də-ˈfi-lē-ə, ˈpē-\


Definition of PEDOPHILIA


: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object


None of the asinine HAIR SPLITTING changes what we all KNOW IT TO BE.

 

Gee, why doesn't OP author say the following to THIS inane and irrelevant smear:

Or THIS inane irrelevant smear or ANY of the other two dozen flames this flamebait thread was posted to attract??:

 

Yep. That completely changes everything.

 

I did..... and I find all these threads strange .

 

which doesn't make him a pedophile....
try again.

 

Are you claiming that the "gentleman" is not in the Teachers Union? Are you also denying that Charles Rust-Tierney was convicted of receiving and distributing child pornography?

 

let's review the thread title which seems to upset you

5th grade teacher: yes, that is confirmed in the story

adult male exclusively engaged in sex with little boys: yes, that is homosexual pedophilia, again confirmed within the story

13 little boys: yes, that number is correct and the local law enforcement says that the number may grow

so, please feel free to show me where the thread topic is incorrect. The only chance the thread topic has of being incorrect is if the police uncover more victims. Then, you can ask the moderators to append the title to reflect the growing number of victims

 

no your problem is you have no idea what pedophilia is, look it up and come back with knowledge not ignorance.

 

I don't intend to make any claim about the rightness or wrongness of either kind of marriage. I simply wish to show that the slippery slope argument has been proven true when it comes to marriage, and that there is no reason to doubt that such progress will continue. After all, before the Loving v. Virginia ruling there were almost no petitions to legalize gay marriage. Afterward, there was a huge push, which has led to the current legalization of gay marriage in several states and will likely culminate with a 50 state acceptance of gay marriage. Now there are already cases being pushed through to legalize polygamy - which I actually think is likely to be the next step. Regardless, I suspect that this will continue.

While it is difficult to find commentary from the sixties on the internet, the statement from Baker v. Nelson about gay marriage:

shows that a similar idea had at least been raised - after all, that is exactly the same argument I keep hearing from the people claiming that legalizing homosexual marriage will never lead to polygamy, incest or other such things.

The interesting thing is that it took about 45 years for the next step in the slide down the slope. If that pattern holds true, and the likely progression continues, it will be at least a century before it gets to this point. Still, it is hard to argue that the slippery slope isn't true, considering the current arguments that have lead to the legalization of homosexual marriage keep referencing the judgements that legalized interracial marriage.

 

It is not the thread title or content which "upsets" me.

I am looking in the story for where it asserts that a "Progressive committed the deeds"?

Where it asserts that "California would let him off"?

ANYWHERE we have the SLIGHTEST indication that the "Left" or "Gay Marriage" or the lack of laws banning homosexuals led to the commission of these rapes, or were involved in ANY way?

Or where California has a policy of releasing pedophiles with a few month sentence? (One guy getting what seems to be a low sentence is an indicator of a hard to prosecute case, not of a policy - California has many lifers in jail for pedophilia!)

And you have NO COMMENT for any of those absurd smears and irrelevancies!

Your double standard for comments is quite clear, and your purpose for selecting "homosexual pedophilia" for headlines is obvious - flamebait and your encouragement of it.

That is fine, just don't coyly pretend you have any other agenda. It is quite unbecoming!

 

You called someone a pedophile who isn't. You don't know what pedophilia is and then you try to talk about Trayvon?
Please get your facts straight and come back.