5th grade teacher committed homosexual pedophilia with 13 little boys

feel free to quote where within the OP that was posted. I'm not sure where you've been reading.

you are welcome to review my other posts here, they are numbers 1 and 43 and feel free to show all of us where any of the things you claim are in the text of my posts

 

He is a minor attracted homosexual man, and he needs Taxpayer funded Rehabilitation services for his mental illnesses.

The judge should sentence him to therapy and mental health prison, as the Europeans would do.

 

I'd rather he be sentenced to a locked room with the dads of those 13 little boys

 

This is a part that ever defender of a criminal forgets. That we caught them as X number of atrocities, it only makes sense to assume they committed XY number of crimes. The 'three stikes' opponents fail to understand that usually that second conviction represents dozens of crimes.

 

You should see how heavily the teacher's union tried to cover up this scumbags previous misgivings and their rule of destroying records 5 years or older.

By the way, he is not the only public school teacher caught in CA, he is just the most vile and disgusting.

 

Wait..they destroy teacher records after 5 years??? What...the..actual...>>>MOD EDIT: EVADING the PROFANITY FILTER<<<

 

I assume we're talking about the teacher in the original post? I'm sure he is in the teacher's union. I don't see how that automatically makes him a "liberal." And I have no idea what the hell you were talking about with the whole "being framed" nonsense.

- - - Updated - - -

I certainly wasn't using that anecdote of proof of anything, simply sharing a story. Unclench.

The second part of my post is a truism.

 

"Tight idea" my left one. It's fully fabricated.

 

Oh yeah! If a teacher in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) did something bad 5 years or greater ago... it is expunged from their records. It was part of the union contract negotiated between them and the Democrats who they donate to. No one is looking out for the kids here.

 

One more example of my axiom: In the world of PF, Pedophiles don't count unless boys are molested.

So I did a search for pedophilia for the last week- and this article doesn't come up. So I went with 'molestation' and looked to see what hits are for 'molestation' from 7:55 yesterday and earlier.

I got hits for a 10 year old girl molested by a 66 year old man
A security guard arrested for child molestation- without any identification of the child's gender.
A university administrator arraignged for molesting a 13 year old girl.
Port Isabel man surrenders on charges of molesting an 11 year old girl.
A Rio Vista man accused of molesting girls at a day care.
A Phoenix man sentenced for molesting a 4 year old girl.
Torrance podiatrist charged with molesting his adopted daughter.
And the case of the OP.

and then on we go
Maryland music teacher arrested for rape and molestation of 15 girls.
Potomac teacher pleading guilty to molesting girls in the 1960's and 1970's.

Why do girls always get the short shift?

Clearly a consistant pattern- one I have identified before- thread after thread about 'homosexual pedophile or pedophilia'- where are the threads about the girls being molested?

To me it is clear- there are only two explanations possible
a) these threads are just excuses to villify homosexuals, by equating them to pedophiles or
b) the posters just don't care about pedophilia as long as boys are not molested.

All pedophilia is bad. Assuming this teacher is guilty, he should be jailed and the key thrown away. But I feel the same way about the teacher noted above who was arrested for raping 15 girls.

 

That's ridiculous. Bunch of retards. Jebus.

 

California requires all teachers to be fingerprinted and background checks conducted- every time a teacher applies for a job.

 

Again, a punt.

The left has no association with conservative ideas and cannot rationally counter them. Maddow and Stewart never offer reason and most follow that lead.

I know everything about every bit of popular leftwad foolishness and can dispatch it all with a couple taut logical sentences.

 

Fixed that for you. When you spew moronic claptrap and assert it's incontrovertible truth when it's not, ignore all arguments to the contrary, and then get one of your right-wing cohorts to come in and say "but it's true!" ... well, if that's the standard of being "right" around here, that's pretty pathetic.

 

LOL- that is your most hilarious post ever!

 

Which was not my point. My point was that if a teacher does something bad, it is removed from their record after 5 years. Apparently, this asshat child rapist did awful things prior and they were expunged. It was all over the radio here in SoCal.

 

are all straight women pedophiles because a few teachers had sex with underaged male students ? you bigots on the far right are fudging retarded. leave this forum.

 

Well, if that's your asinine opinion, I suppose you're welcome to it. What other historical figures should we purge from the classroom for their equally questionable behavior?

Meanwhile: WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THE TOPIC? Milk isn't the topic of this thread, nor is California's recognition of him.

 

A fine cross between a Stewart smirk and a 2nd grade school yard taunt. About par.

 

^ Social Conservative, Religion-Inspired Lobby BS. See how that works? If you don't have to support your claims, then neither do I. (although mine is probably closer to the truth!)

Meanwhile back in the real, real world:

https://www.google.com/#fp=50b2bbc6be16162c&q=define:+pedophile

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pedophile

[HR][/HR]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pedophile

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/pedophile?q=pedophile

• That's real dictionaries - 4, Grokmaster - 0. And gee, I even provided the links to back it up. Imagine that. What's more your own definition doesn't say "child molestation". It says "the preferred sexual object". That would also refer as much to the attraction (if not more so), than the expression of that attraction through behavior.
  
  So you have my permission to sit down and shut your yapper if your only contribution is going to be more lies.

 

Or worse yet, that parents may be able to consent for their children.

 

Sorry. It does.

pe·do·phile
/&#712;ped&#601;&#716;f&#299;l/
Noun
A person who is sexually attracted to children.

child
/CH&#299;ld/
Noun

1. A young human being below the age of full physical development or below the legal age of majority.
2. A son or daughter of any age.

 

Indeed they are. Is anyone saying they are not?

- - - Updated - - -

Now define children:

child
/CH&#299;ld/
Noun

1. A young human being below the age of full physical development or below the legal age of majority.
2. A son or daughter of any age.

 

Well, I could quote you the clinical definition of pedophile (being an interest in pre-pubescent children) But ultimately you're missing the point. I was responding to Grokmaster's claim that pedophilia is defined as child molestation. So defining 'child' is irrelevant to that context, as it doesn't establish that all pedophiles are child molesters, nor that all persons who have a sexual relationship with a child are pedophiles as a matter of their primary attractions. The point was that pedophilia has to do with the attraction.

As for Milk, which I presume to be the aim of your claim, we only know how old the 'child' in question was when they met, not at what age they started having a sexual relationship. There is also the matter of the legal age of consent. If this 'boy' was at the legal age of consent when their sexual relationship started, then what's your complaint? I'm not saying that I approve of his actions either way, because I don't. And there is no evidence that Milk had relationships with any other minors in their late teens. The characterization of Milk as a pedophile is not supported by any verifiable fact. No one has been able to show that he was even arrested on charges of molesting children, much less successfully prosecuted for it. What is presented is basically an attempt to try the man posthumously in the court of public opinion. So we have to ask, to what purpose? And that purpose is all too clear - as a proxy for branding all homosexuals as child molesters.

In response to which there are many choice things I could say, but I'll just suggest that y'all go to YouTube and search for "Lily Allen" and "Gaycollab" if you want to know what I really think of you and your opinions of gay people.

Now, if you can produce solid evidence that contradicts this, then have at it. If all you've got is conjecture with nothing real to back it up, then who gives a flying squirrel about your opinion.

 

That's exactly where it entered this world from. There's a healthy fantasy world that thrives on this board(which is just a microcosm of a larger hysteria) regarding liberals and progressives, but really those terms have broadened to mean anyone they don't like, find immoral, or disagree with on most anything. I sometimes wonder whether these are the "real Americans" Sarah Palin spoke of in 2008.