9/11 WTC Demolitions, American Anger Lives On! The Criminals Exposed!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Nov 13, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did post a link to the specific PDF. I assumed you possess the intelligence to locate the pdf in the table of contents of the entire NIST report. Have I assumed too much? Let me know when you've read the report.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow, Koko.

    I am still waiting for you to get back to me on that court thing. Remember, where you said I was the NIST, and you were going to prosecute me, then tried to make me provide sources to your evidence, and it all backlashed on you and proved you aren't a lawyer.

    Let me know when you're ready to proceed.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not my problem you didnt understand the improvisation.
     
  4. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't worry about it. He threw his own case out, remember?
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there is a point when your (*)(*)(*)(*) simply turns into a lie
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113



    perty picture!

    Nice nothing for a report!


    I already have a video pf the perty picture.

    so you have nothing to talk about thats fine with me.
     
  7. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think Fang pretty much already proved that you don't understand much of anything.

    I forgot though, you did throw it out after the judge gave me sanctions and slapped you in the face during the 26f conference. You know, the one you requested? LoL
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats ok for you too since you obviously cannot explain how that steel has 15 centuries of erosion in a few years or the columns reduced to being paper thin any more than fang can. Yeh and I roasted him on his pyro theory! LOL

    The debunking biz is going downhill fast now days.
     
  9. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You still haven't read the report? Do you need someone literate to read it to you?
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jojo plays dodgeball again! :D
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    as I said you think you got a point make it.

    I made my point, you are not responding and as I said thats fine with me I give a (*)(*)(*)(*).

    15 centuries of salt water erosion in a couple years LOL
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The point has been made repeatedly. You seem to be the only one too ignorant to grasp it.

    When are you going to have someone read the report to you, Jojo?
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes my point has been made repeatedly refute or drop it.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Once again you are confused. Go back and read the conversation again. Or have an adult read it to you.

    Fangbeer keeps making his point, and you keep fleeing from him every time he spanks you. It's hilarious!

    Now is the time you make another post full of meaningless pictures and gifs .... and ... Go!
     
  15. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You made no point. You made an unsourced, unsupported claim that you expected me to research for you. When you've read the report, we can discuss your difficulty in understanding the large words used to describe the phenomenon present in the photographs you keep spamming to this thread.
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you know its one thing when everyone believes you dont know (*)(*)(*)(*) and its another thing when you get on a keyboard and prove it.

    Pictures and gifs are the most fundamental and accurate means of communication. If you were to post porn a mod would immediately know what it was and strip it and you from the site.

    The reason is because a picture is unequivocally understandable to anyone smart enough to know what they are looking at.

    Thanks for impeaching yourself proving beyond a shadow of unreasonable doubt your lack of knowledge and most likely fangs as well.
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I will read what ever you post, until then you failed to rebut, have a wonderful day.
     
  18. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You want us to believe that you passed the bar and you write posts like this?
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    whats amusing is that deblunders are stepping all over their weenies over the undeniably painfully obvious.

    for steel experts arguing the glubbermint position they arent doing too well!

    On a scope of 0 to 10 they score a -22 LOL




    this is the way it was delivered from walmart;

    [​IMG]


    and this is the way it looks now;

    [​IMG]




    and debunkers in their best efforts cant seem to find a difference.


    They seem to need it explained to them?


    What steel expert needs something so obvious "explained" to them?

    Maybe my exptations are WAY TO HIGH but it seems to me that these steel experts who spend most of their time throwing pejoratives at people at least have some rudimentary explanation why the second one does not look approximately the same as the first one.

    I am shocked that debunkers have no idea what that makes them look like!

    [​IMG]


    I mean aside from the little white ones [​IMG]


    but dont worry jesus loves you anyway
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it's a box beam with impact damage.....what of it?
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    strike 1
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jojo, you struck out long ago. Standing on the field, crying in your own puddle, won't change the outcome.
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not going to answer koko? just continue to be obtuse?
     
  24. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong sport. Think bowling.

    Koko, do you stand by your statement: "Pictures and gifs are the most fundamental and accurate means of communication?"

    It's certainly one of the stupidest legal positions I've ever heard of.

    That's because your pictures fail to communicate a lot of information. For instance, the pictures fail to communicate the fact that the WTC used many different spandrel configurations. The spandrel in your first photo is certainly not identified by name, type, or location. The second photo does not identify the spandrel section either. Thus, your attempt to insinuate that they are two photos taken of the same plate at different times is completely unsupported by "anyone smart enough to know what they are looking at. "

    That brings us to time; another thing your fundamental communication method doesn't communicate. There's no indication of when either photograph was taken. As I already showed, at least one of your photos was taken by the very investigative body you claim didn't discuss the phenomenon. Even more hilarious and damaging to your argument is the fact that they did so with the specific purpose of documenting exactly what caused the phenomenon shown. If you had bothered to actually read the report, rather than whine that you don't know how to read a table of contents, then you might not be making such obvious mistakes in this discussion.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,471
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113

    what you fail to do is grasp the substance of the points made.

    labels are irrelevant and red herrings.

    I am pointing out the condition the metal is in and anyone smart enough to know that could give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about labels.

    Call them blueberry muffins and strawberry pancakes for all I give a (*)(*)(*)(*).

    The point that NISTS chief engineer gross is hanging onto steel that runs from more than 1/2" thick thinning to a knifes edge and you claiming you cannot identify it is admission of fraud and explains why far more than 50% of the steel is unaccounted for in the reports and why we see streamers SPRAYING off the columns BEFORE they fall .

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    Here is Gross didnt see any molten steel though he had 3 months to open his eyes and holding onto steel that thinned to a knifes edge and did not see that either, in fact he didnt see anything at all.

    But then that is how cover ups work.
    People get really stoopid.

    [video=youtube;wcqf5tL887o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcqf5tL887o[/video]


    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]





    and if the boss does not see and you want to keep your job you (*)(*)(*)(*) well better not see it eh


    whats amusing is that deblunders are stepping all over their weenies over the undeniably painfully obvious.

    for steel experts arguing the glubbermint position they arent doing too well!

    On a scope of 0 to 10 they score a -22 LOL




    this is the way it was delivered from walmart;

    [​IMG]


    and this is the way it looks now;

    [​IMG]




    and debunkers in their best efforts cant seem to find a difference.


    They seem to need it explained to them?


    What steel expert needs something so obvious "explained" to them?

    Maybe my exptations are WAY TO HIGH but it seems to me that these steel experts who spend most of their time throwing pejoratives at people at least have some rudimentary explanation why the second one does not look approximately the same as the first one.

    I am shocked that debunkers have no idea what that makes them look like!

    [​IMG]


    I mean aside from the little white ones [​IMG]


    but dont worry jesus loves you anyway






    any more red herrings you want to talk about?


    .
     

Share This Page