911 Mr Demo says: Will the REAL COLLAPSE please stand up

(DDave raises his hand.)

Excuse me Professor Koko . . .

What does "stip the variance" mean?

What else is a building collapse going to look like?

 

did I call this (*)(*)(*)(*) or what? Didnt think you would be able to figger it out and nope thats why I get paid the big bucks LOL

Thanks fo playing

 

they are completely different.

 

Most assuredly,someone isn't getting their money's worth,then.

 

Obama just declared a similar victory.

 

"A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep"

very true, which applies perfectly to anyone in denial or vested agency interest.

stop whining, short of posting the math I gave you the answers and you still do not get it. not my problem.

 

You fell short of posting the math because you don't even know what the math is. Distance and time are irrelevant remember?

 

get it through your thick skull, I never said that. It was your statement. You are not an engineer and have no clue how to figger it out.

you continually point that out. no need for me to repeating it.

 

Yes, you did. Repeatedly.

Don't whine now that you are backed into a corner. Just apologize.

 

Just to refresh your memory where you said what you didn't say.

 

enough already, that is your constructive expanded knee jerk blanket conclusion, not what I said or alluded to.

you neither understood the point nor understand how extrapolate the answers.

either come out here with the answers or give it a rest.

unlike you I am not here to indoctrinate, I mean teach.

 

normally I would say there are several other "collapses" in the OP that troughers can discuss, but they cant seem to get past their script.

neither do they appear to be intelligent enough or experienced enough to even breach the subject, much less have a fruitful discussion with that regard.

.

 

there are only THREE collapses that should be discussed here......your red herrings are starting to stink the place up,'professor'

 

So the person who can't be bothered to write complete words, let alone complete sentences is complaining about people who are not able to understand him.

Seems reasonable.

If you're a truther.

 

whenever a trougher simply does not get it, blame it on a truther!

 

still misusing trougher.......What can one expect from a legend in his own mind?

 

What kind of person argues with cats?

 

Fang, Please don't set me up with a straight line like that.

 

So a building collapse and a controlled demolition are completely different??

Please elaborate.

 

well the best answers are from troughers.

they will tell you that if it was a demolition that ALL building are constructed so that they hold up a big sign saying "-->THIS IS A DEMOLITION<--" whereas a natural collapse says "-->I cant fall in my own fotprint<--"

thats how troughers can tell the difference





now these demolitions cheated and did not hold up theirs signs and I think there ought to be a law and fine them because even though we know by the admission of nist that the one on the left collapsed at freefall troughers cannot seem to grasp that simple concept that global instantaneous freefall into its footprint is ALWAYS a demolition. they cant handle reality so their minds just sort of blip out.

troughers are an endangered species because its very difficult being a trougher in a truther world.

so you can understand their frustration when they cant show any building in history that globally collapsed of purely natural causes in its own footprint.

but then there are 6 more "collapses" for us to have fun with, but a gain troughers cant leave their "script"

sucks to be a trougher I guess.

 

Building 7 neither collapsed at free fall nor did it collapse into its own footprint. NIST never once claimed global free fall of any of the buildings.

 

yeh it did.

show me any other 47 story building with a tighter collapse footprint than 7.

 

No, it didn't. I'd ask you to source your claim, but I already know you can't.

Several other buildings were damaged by the collapse ... Outside the footprint of WTC7.

 

its been sourced for you thousands of times if you didnt "get it" then you wont now.

damaging other buildings has nothing to do with COMPARATIVE footprint that you will NEVER PRODUCE because it DOES NOT EXIST.

chalk up another fail for you
LOL

 

In other words, you can't source your claim.

As expected.