911 Mr Demo says: Will the REAL COLLAPSE please stand up

in other words you cant support your claim on ANY level.

predicted

 

You made your claim first, I called the fact that you would be unable to support it.

You proved me right. Trying to misdirect your own impotence doesn't make it go away.

 

peek a boo we see you! you cant hide that easily

 

Source your claims.

 

show me any other 47 story building with a tighter collapse footprint than 7.

 

You haven't sourced it once. Apparently you can't.

 

waiting

 

Source your claims or continue to post childish gifs. Which will you choose?

 

source your claim

 

As soon as you do. I did ask you first.

(It's okay, though ... everyone knows you can't.)

 

source your claim

so you admit you have nothing.


"nah nah asked you first nah nah"

last chance, then I am done with your childish foolishness.

 

Just as soon as you do. You made the claim, now let's see you back it up.

(Or run away, as you always do when defeated.) Nothing funnier than an impotent 'truther'.

 

source your claim

I told you I already did, you are to (*)(*)(*)(*)ing lazy to read it too (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bad. Find someone else to change your diapers.



I am done with you.

 

I know what you told me, but it's clear to everyone that you didn't. I'd say nice try, but it really wasn't.

So now you will feign indignation and run away. Sorry I embarrassed you. Again. Buh-bye.

 

thanks for playing

 

ok moving on;

In previous posts troughers are claiming that that 7 did not fall in its footprint. How bout it troughers lets see your pics of ANY other 47 story building with a tighter collapse footprint than 7. we really need that citation because everyone is desperately trying not to call you all flat out liars.

 

In previous posts you claimed that speed of collapse was important, but height and time of comparison buildings were irrelevant. Are you going to have the same issue with the proportion of area to height in footprint comparisons?

 

So, when you get your ass handed to you over the fact WTC 7 didn't fall within its own footprint, you try to pretend the incredibly dishonest tactic of demanding someone show a 47 story building that had a tighter collapse footprint is somehow an honest question. BWAAAAHHAHAHAHAA!!!

So why is your question so incredibly dishonest (like most of your posts)? Because the highest building ever imploded was the J.L. Hudson building at 439'. Of course, when it was imploded, it fell within its own footprint and did not damage the surrounding buildings. So what other 47 story buildings have collapsed? Hmmm. No other 47 story building has collapsed either through controlled demolition or through other causes. Of course, you know this which is why your question is both dishonest and unanswerable.

Keep up the good work of portraying truthers in the worst possible light! No debunker could ever make the TBM look as bad as you do.

 

ask a trougher to prove it and they say its dishonest

your problem is obvious

 

Still can't use 'trougher' in the correct context,can you jojo?


YOUR problem is obvious

 

Yes. My problem is I am dealing with a known, proven liar that can't address the dishonesty of his own posts. Or do you consider asking someone to provide an example that has never occurred honest? Who knows. With all the other (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up things you've claimed, maybe you actually consider asking someone to give an example of something that has never happened as honest.

 

The pictures of all the 47 story controlled demolition debris fields are all filed right next to all the photos of golf ball sized fusion devices.

There's no double standard.

 

proven?

I do not recall going to court for anything like that.

Was there a trial without my knowledge?

cite the case number

 

Since you believe their are no micro nukes, then you have unwittingly admitted that you have no pics zippo nadda nothing to support any claim what so ever that 7 did not fall into its own footprint and the common industry understanding stands.

thank you for playing.

 

No court is needed to confirm that your posts are all lies. You've been proven wrong so many times on this board in the short time that I've been here that it has to be common knowledge. Your thoughts are so off base when it comes to 9/11 that it's not even funny. I am starting to believe that if anyone is a paid shill, it has to be you. You're sent here to make the truth movement look so stupid that no one would possibly follow it.

If what I said is not true than I have no other explanation as to why you think that way.