911 - Was Flight 77 an invisible inferno?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Apr 15, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shortly after 9/11, AA Flt 587 entered the wake turbulence of another jet and the turbulence knocked it so far off course that it wound up in pieces around Long Island. You really do need to understand this phenomenon before the picture of the aircraft about to strike the Pentagon makes any sense. But I have no time to teach someone so obviously intent on not learning.
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that is entire different, the real problem here is why are you trying to play expert regarding things you know little to nothing about?
     
  3. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong! I am retired military, with fire fighting and construction experience and not a bit of what you are posting makes sense.

    Now, suppose you tell me what besides a 757 could do the damage observed at the Pentagon.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so you know nothing about demolitions got it.
     
  5. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nowe you are just blathering. You cannot demonstrate how your theory could possibly be true, so you just shriek louder that it is.

    How about a diagram of how those marks on the walls could be made with HE?
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    anyone who does not recognize (*)(*)(*)(*) that is so obvious even a dumb layman can see not only lacks working knowledge but the ability to think their way through a problem and come up with correct answers. The only reason I cannot demonstrate anything on this board is not because its not factually correct but certain people are obtuse and obstinate in even when their posts causes them incredible embarrassment.
     
  7. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Fake physicist, heal thyself
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that we can do right here and now, make your case and lets rock.
     
  9. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It does not work that way. Your claim is counter-intuitive, so the burden of proof is on you.

    You have to show how anything other than aircraft of the size of those identified in the official narrative could have made the marks observed at four locations.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    little c4 will make those marks too.
     
  11. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bull (*)(*)(*)(*). Try again.
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I dont see demolition in your resume
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nor in yours. You do have a huge deficit of grammar, however.
     
  14. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually in your case it seems like a "dumb layman" sees things that are not obvious to the experts.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the only people who "get it" [what I say] are the experts. LMAOI
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have exactly zero experts backing your claims.
     
  17. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But he has a bunch of "dumb layman" to back him up!
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    when I want to argue with dumb laymen with big heads I come here. LMAO

    you can always tell a dumb lay man who is a trougher.

    fire is hot
    day lit match
    hot weakens steel
    bewding faw down

    Nist said so

    Praise be to NIST Lord God on High!
    Unbelievers, the infidels be damned!
     
  19. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Most of my knowledge of demolitions comes from watching and taking pictures while my unit was blowing stuff up for training at Ft. Campbell. I did get a chance to watch CDI at work one time in Seattle.

    You have not shown me anything consistant with anything I observed there

    Now, would you care to show us how you think that HE could have been used to do the damage seen at the Pentagon?
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what kind of a question is that?

    light the fuse and bigga badda boom lol
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lit Fuses aren't used for controlled demolition.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    try to keep up eh. cd is not used to damage, but to destroy a building DUH

    thanks for your contribution.
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And it does not use lit fuses. CD was not present on 9/11.
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plus CD IS used to damage a building to structural failure

    Gravity actually destroys it.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    prove it!!!!!

    lmao

    - - - Updated - - -

    not if you use a nuke

    ever notice how troughers are totally in the micro-box thinkers
     

Share This Page